Jesse Singal Profile picture
Aug 27, 2019 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Oh no the people who wrote bad articles about Louis CK's recent standup are now writing bad articles about Dave Chappelle's.

It always boils down to "He was always offensive, but he didn't offend groups I feel connected to before."

vice.com/en_us/article/…
2/ Endless iterations of the Onion thing where people laugh uproariously at jokes about the Holocaust/disabled people/religious beliefss/everything else -- then they make fun of a child actress in a ridiculously over-the-top way and everyone needs a fainting couch. Disingenous.
(From 2017, also Vice)

ONE OF DAVE CHAPPELLE'S OLD STANDUP CHARACTERS WAS A FOUL-MOUTHED CRACK-DEALING BABY
This stuff annoys me because I think cultural criticism, and conversations about what we should joke about, are important. And they are being outsources to people who are either too young or too clueless or too scoldy to bring any context to these controversies. You *cannot*
laugh along as a comedian skewers almost every possible subject offensively, clap along, write glowing profiles of him, and then, when he's mired in controversy, start combing through his new material - but only his new material - with a fine-tooth offense-comb. It's incoherent!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jesse Singal

Jesse Singal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jessesingal

Jun 27
1/ New from me in @TheEconomist: Emails released during discovery in a youth gender medicine case demonstrate that the World Professional Association for Transgender Health interfered w/the systematic reviews it commissioned from Johns Hopkins University.

economist.com/united-states/…
2/ The emails are damning, showing that for many months WPATH sought to control the output of the JHU team it paid $200k to examine questions pertaining to transgender healthcare as the Standards of Care 8 was developed.
3/ The quotes couldn’t be more explicit: “Hopkins as an academic institution, and I as a faculty member therein, will not sign something that limits academic freedom in this manner,” said Karen Robinson, head of the JHU effort, at one point. She consistently pushed back.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 12
Not a direct comparison, but on the general principle: A good example of this was when some journalists and academics questioned the recovered-memory/Satanic sex abuse movement, causing them to be reviled by survivors' groups. As we all know, these "just asking questions" skeptics were wrong -- kids *were* routinely being stapled to trees, ritually raped by their pre-school teachers, etc., because recovered memories are always accurate. I'm glad Evan is helping promote solid journalism.
2/ More generally, "If you didn't do the thing you were accused of, why are people circulating memes saying you did?" is an excellent standard and a sign of a really sharp mind at work. I'd like to actually see if we can get this codified into the justice system.
3/ Slightly more recent example: Robby Soave DESPICABLY suggested the UVA rape story didn't add up. Anna Merlan famously called him out for it, and he was piled on by other supporters of rape victims. As we know, Soave was wrong -- the story was 100% true. Other examples abound. Image
Read 4 tweets
May 6
It's 2024 and CNN cannot define 'sex' in a remotely coherent way: "A person’s sex is what they were assigned at birth based on biological characteristics of maleness or femaleness as indicated by chromosomes, gonads, hormones and genitals."

cnn.com/2024/05/06/hea…
2/Gender = "social construct and social identity marked by certain attitudes, feelings and behaviors a culture associates with someone’s biological sex, according to the [APA]." It's a construct AND and identity, and it's marked by 'certain' attitudes, feelings, and behaviors. k
3/ I think at a certain point, if you're going to claim that if people deviate from your preferred understanding of sex and gender and gender identity, it is going to lead to widespread oppression and possibly suicide, you have an obligation to define your terms clearly.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 27
Amazing chain of events. The kid reiterates his murderous views *during* a disciplinary meeting and posts it online. He brags to his audience about having not walked it back. Columbia (apparently) doesn't take any further action. Then, when it goes public, he's sorry, Columbia's sorry (and bans him from campus), everyone's so sorry

nytimes.com/2024/04/26/nyr…
2/ The meeting was held by the "Center for Student Success and Intervention," one of God knows how many administrative bodies. Surely it creates a lot of work for folks. Those employees decided it's no big deal if this kid is threatening to kill his classmates. Image
3/ On one, I should specify I don't know for sure if they didn't take *any* action. What I do know is that this was in January, and he wasn't banned after threatening to kill Zionists and then doubling down during a disciplinary meeting.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 15
1/ The Cass Review explains, in detail, why we need to trust systematic reviews over both doctors' anecdotal evidence and low-quality standards published by professional associations. The CBC responds by publishing an article that cites professional associations and is dominated by doctors' anecdotal accounts.

Science journalism seems screwed at the moment.

cbc.ca/news/health/pu…
2/ This might be the worst bit:

"Surveys and interviews are considered low-quality evidence in medicine, said [Pediatrician Dr. Tehseen Ladha], but that might be misleading to the general public. 'Many people would see low-quality evidence and think well, that means this could harm our children. But that's not what it means.' "

That's... exactly what low-quality evidence for a major intervention means. It means we don't know if the intervention offers a net benefit, because the true effects might differ significantly from what the studies in question present.Image
3/ Stuff like this isn't just the normal incompetence and sloppiness that plagues this subject. It is critically dangerous science miscommunication disseminated by the most important outlet in Canada. It's absolutely inexcusable and has to stop.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 11
1/ Sam Seder just found out about the Cass Report yesterday and he is VERY concerned
2/ Should address one substantive point here. The caller says the Cass Review threatens access to hormones/surgery for any trans person under 25. This is NOT true. It's a viral rumor that popped up right after the report came out. I think the source is Erin Reed.
3/ Reed appears to be one of the most viral sources of misinformation about youth gender medicine within trans activism. In this case, she badly misread a part of the Cass Review and seeded her audience with the false 25 claim. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(