Keira Profile picture
Aug 28, 2019 18 tweets 14 min read Read on X
I want to tweet every single line of this article by @Jetjocko in @wired but I’ll start with this one: “The idea that should run freon through your cortex is that Jeffrey Epstein likely helped plant some thoughts there” wired.com/story/jeffrey-… 1/x
@jetjocko @WIRED It is the most concise, well written article I’ve seen yet on the damage that willful blindness and continued engagement with Epstein has wrought. What ideas did he help shape? What other ideas got ignored? wired.com/story/jeffrey-… 2/x
@jetjocko @WIRED The magnitude of those two questions should cause every single scientist working at the intersection of humankind and technology to pause, from biotechnologists to AI developers. 3/x
@jetjocko @WIRED Scientists, is the thing you’re working on contributing to this legacy? How do you know it is or isn’t? What is your own personal litmus test for whether you are supporting Epstein’s vision of the world or not? 4/x
@jetjocko @WIRED Part of the reason I am continuously horrified by these revelations is that Epstein lives in my brain, somewhere, in the narratives he funded and helped shape. The scientific discipline that I thought could change the world is rooted in those stories. 5/x
@jetjocko @WIRED It’s not hypothetical. Epstein was engaged in #scicomm as part of Seed Media Group, crafting our understanding of how technology shapes and is shaped by us, claiming authority over questions like “The Meaning of Life” 6/x
@jetjocko @WIRED Who else served in this capacity? What other vision informed the magazine that looked at the intersection of science and society? Unrepentant racist and sexist James Watson, alongside Epstein confederate Maxwell. 7/x
@jetjocko @WIRED Receipts. WayBack Machine showing Watson/Maxwell web.archive.org/web/2007081901…
Original complaint alleging Epstein’s involvement: cases.justia.com/federal/distri…, )
@jetjocko @WIRED Watson did not hide who he was. There is no way to have worked with the man and known him for anything other than a bigot. And this, this is who was responsible for directing and award winning #scicomm magazine. 8/x
@jetjocko @WIRED It is completely disturbing to watch these connections emerge from the dark. 9/x
@jetjocko @WIRED @jetjocko writes the beating heart of it in his article: “These men—it’s almost entirely men—have defined the way culture has thought about, absorbed, and acted on technological change. And their inner circle included a monster.” 10/x
@jetjocko @WIRED It sickens me to say it, but entire fields have been shaped by the influence of Jeffrey Epstein, both financial and philosophical. The institutions and leaders who continued to work with Epstein are responsible for this. 11/x
@jetjocko @WIRED This is why the letter of support for Joi Ito is so wrenching. Because it does not acknowledge that Ito is responsible unknowingly or otherwise for the propagation of Epstein’s interests. He failed his institution. 12/x
@jetjocko @WIRED After his own apology, @geochurch signed this letter to support Ito. By his own admission, George had “nerd tunnel vision” when it came to Epstein. That same tunnel vision is keeping him locked into institutions and leadership that have failed him. It is disappointing. 13/x
@jetjocko @WIRED @geochurch After I left the military, I watched one of the best commanders I know take responsibility for a systemic problem that came to a head on his watch. It cost him a star and his career. It was the right thing to do. 14/x
@jetjocko @WIRED @geochurch True leadership lies in public acknowledgement of your failure to protect your people and the willingness to bear the consequences of that failure. There are more leaders out there. There are more visions. We do not need to keep the same people in charge. 15/x
@jetjocko @WIRED @geochurch It is not vindictive to hold people to account. It is not a betrayal to acknowledge harm. It is essential. Without that, the wound festers. @dearsarah talks about this complicated relationship in great detail. 16/x
@jetjocko @WIRED @geochurch @dearsarah Science & scientists, let’s have some courage. Lets, as @jetjocko says “bust open the doors, fling wide the windows”. Let’s expose the rot. 17/17 wired.com/story/jeffrey-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Keira

Keira Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Keira_Havens

Sep 24, 2023
New Box of Rocks is out on IQ, eugenics, and a thinker following Pinker's blueprint for mainstreaming biological essentialism - Scott Alexander Siskind of SlateStarCodex. medium.com/@Keira_Havens/…
If you're not familiar with Siskind, @CadeMetz wrote a profile a few years ago that resulted in quite a backlash - many, many, many people in effective altruism, rationalist, tech communities and beyond read Siskind's work nytimes.com/2021/02/13/tec…
@CadeMetz So it was particularly concerning to realize that he (like Hanania and Pinker) had decided to deliberately hide his affinity for "human biodiversity" as endorsed by Steve Sailer while actively introducing hereditarian concepts to his enormous audience.
Read 11 tweets
Nov 12, 2019
I cannot believe this. @sciam this is not okay. It is irresponsible to pose this question, to normalize the asking of it. This puts a veneer of scientism over the reprehensible idea that biology is the final arbiter of human nature. It is not. Do better.
The most irritating part of this is that IT IS A GOOD ARTICLE. The author doesn't hedge for clickbait. He calls out yet another reheated racist argument pretending to be science. The headline does the exact opposite. Have some pride @sciam, change the headline
It is a really good article that doesn't pull punches about the dangers of this sort of pseudoscience. Thanks for writing it @Horganism. @sciam, this is the headline you need: "Richard Wrangham's Absurdly Crude Biological Determinsim"
Read 5 tweets
Oct 7, 2019
Well. I certainly have a lot of thoughts on this. I'll call this thread Being Wrong In Science. 1/×

Might be long.

Probably, definitely long. Image
.@DrJenGunter @phylogenomics @jameshamblin and more have already gotten PNAS to take down the sexualized imagery, so thank you to everyone who called this out. But this study itself, and the conclusions it draws, didn't show up out of the blue. 1/x
@DrJenGunter @phylogenomics @jameshamblin I'm struggling a little with where to start. In my last thread, some very earnest commenters wanted me to address the is/ought fallacy, so let's begin there. First, for clarity: simply because something is, does not mean it should be.
Read 30 tweets
Sep 20, 2019
I’m sure this person thinks they’re being clever, but you know what, let’s do this: Newton WAS wrong. A thread on perspective, bias, and how our particular circumstance impacts our thinking. 1/x
I’ll start with the laws of motion. When Newton wrote these up, he was observing momentum. The concept of "energy" as we understand it today did not exist 2/x
One hundred years later, Émilie du Châtelet, dropped heavy balls onto soft clay from different heights and realized that Newton’s calculations were wrong. The force of impact depended something other than momentum. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89mil… 3/x
Read 31 tweets
Aug 5, 2019
Let’s talk bodies, self, and the ethical use of biotechnology. A thread on what a human is, the differences between individuals, and autonomy as the bedrock principle of the biotechnological age. 1/x
Here’s the previous discussion on science, legitimacy, and social capital if you missed it
I’m a molecular biologist. I work with the bits and pieces of biology that are shared by every single living thing on this planet - DNA, RNA, and protein. 3/x
Read 40 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(