If true, is this terribly clever? Rebels meet at Chruch House during prorogue creating regular media story, then amendment to Queens Speech creates chance to vote against the Government without having to no-confidence... then convention says Gov falls...?
Apparently the convention on Queens Speech amendment may no longer hold. But the broader point does. The Government, having failed to persuade Labour to table a no-confidence vote in Sept so an election could be called for Nov 1, just called its own no-confidence vote in October.
So now to see whether no-deal opponents hold good with their promise to keep meeting as an alternative Parliament, perhaps taking evidence of no-deal impacts...? Also, far from my area, can Parliament overturn the prorogue decision in September?
This story will develop. So many impacts - from an EU negotiating point of view Johnson can now not say he has a majority for a deal. So no-deal goes up in probability. From a UK precedent point of view, a clear hit to parliamentary sovereignty.
Also this, would there now be any time to pass a Withdrawal Agreement? Ultimately though start counting the numbers for a Vote of No Confidence around Oct 21.
@davidallengreen A key question for the EU negotiations is this - is the EU more likely to make concessions to avoid no-deal, or to get a deal through Parliament? Serious EU watchers think the latter, making today's announcement a move towards no-deal
@davidallengreen "Member States are watching what Parliament does with great interest and it is only by showing unity and resolve that we stand a chance of securing a new deal that can be passed by Parliament". True. Impossible to do if not sitting. Blatantly contradictory
@davidallengreen MPs who don't want no-deal have to home in on this point - he is saying one thing and doing something completely different. And there's no realistic chance of a deal on the basis of what he is doing.
@davidallengreen Questionable as to whether this is Government's plan
@davidallengreen Thinking - wouldn't the easiest thing be for Parliament now to pass an emergency bill next week to continue sitting until the Queens Speech? Bound to pass you would think, and avoid the VONC trap. (how about extra 3 weeks and give Parliament control?)
@davidallengreen Basically Parliamentary opponents of no-deal need to sidestep this. Really quite feasible. Every chance today's Government plan soon looks like one of Baldrick's cunning plans...
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC They might want to give this impression, but if this is really the strategy they are naive about the EU and prepared to take on their own party. Doesn't seem likely. More likely a move towards no-deal and an election soon after.
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC Like @lewis_goodall never saw a difference between the two sides in their willingness to define themselves as noble and the other as vandals. But this misses what's been the crucial issue for two years - the Government does not have a majority
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites So if I'm not mistaken the Government has made an announcement today about proroguing Parliament which they can't fully deliver due to the previous Grieve amendment, but have galvanised the anti no-deal crowd in doing so. Garvan may be right here...
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites There's some debate on whether Parliament needs to return on 9 October or that's covered by the timetable announced... we'll see. More broadly today's announcement seems to have galvanised anti no-deal MPs and ensured all attention returns to Brexit, not sure that was the plan
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites Meanwhile, red herring alert. Since we're promised a different Withdrawal Agreement if one returns at all this would not actually be relevant. There are circumstances this would be relevant, but hard to see them. And still why such a long delay?
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites Similarly the theory that Johnson is serious about negotiations, which some in EU still hope, doesn't really hold. Double-crossing the very people cheering his announcement today to get the votes of those denouncing him doesn't feel credible
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites Not really an anti-democratic coup. More the actions of a Government without a majority on the key issue of the day taking advantage of the space given in our constitution to usually majority Governments. Sign of weakness Gov have to run from MPs, and it can still be outvoted.
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites Apparently Parliament can in theory at least overturn the decision to prorogue. So emergency debate granted by speaker given his role, and vote to overturn? But then does that need to be turned into law, which is more difficult...
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites Am finding the reaction to today's announcement from elsewhere to be interesting - with less emotional investment they are focusing squarely on the democratic implications, and it doesn't look good for the UK
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites And I know we're focused on the UK, but meanwhile the Irish have been making clear, again, that the backstop is not being taken out of a UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement. Argument Parliament being prorogued to allow Johnson to make a deal utterly unconvincing
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites Lots of noise but I wonder whether the only thing that has really changed today is that opponents of no-deal are angrier. There will still be a legislative attempt to prevent it, but ultimately it may all depend on enough anti no-deal MPs agreeing on a new PM around Oct 20...
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites Ancient history this letter of course, but the point made within about the bills that fall, and the secondary legislation that doesn't happen. How can we be assured that all is on track when Parliament will only sit a handful of days at the end of October?
@davidallengreen@GeorgePeretzQC@lewis_goodall@Sime0nStylites Ok, drawing this thread on what happened to a close, and await the more sober takes on what it means and what happens next. My own starter on that, borrowing from @Sime0nStylites, it has been another divisive day in UK politics, and that is dangerous. /end (for now)
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What you seem unlikely to read elsewhere - yesterday's Starmer - von der Leyen meeting was successful, and had the right outcome - a commitment to regular ongoing summits, and joint working to prepare them.
To those complaining about the UK's lack of detail - a lazy, uninformed complaint. The EU doesn't (yet) have a mandate, the UK doesn't (yet) need to have all the asks. Both need to come in time. That will be the test of the next few months, now was not the time. As was agreed.
Those saying this is going nowhere until the UK implements everything in full, that message was received and @NickTorfaen explicitly said this at an EU reception at Labour Conference. Labour's messaging hasn't been perfect to date, it has though been good enough.
Three days in Brussels mostly talking UK-EU relations after the elections with various folk on all sides, but also hard to get away from US-EU-China talk, or concerns about the direction of travel for the EU. So what were my top 10 findings? Settle down for a thread π§΅
1 - though far from top priority, the EU will happily engage with the UK. There's interest in what a new government will do. But they also expect their own interests - recently youth mobility, and fishing - to be taken seriously. Where there's overlap - security - expect progress
2 - the UK has to prepare for a really tough ongoing engagement with the EU. This will not be a single negotiation but a series of small encounters, mini-deals, cooperations etc. Unless Labour red lines change. A new narrative for the relationship - but only in part.
Like it or not, we are stuck for a while in the technocratic realities of international relations when it comes to UK-EU relations. I'd expect there to be a time when that changes, when there's a rejuvenated campaign for rejoining, but not for a while.
Why are the technocratic realities of international relations not a hot topic in the General Election?
Asked nobody, for good reason. Not that UK-EU relations won't be important to various policy issues. But hardly top-ticket politics.
Today's big trade news - that the EU will apply additional tariffs of around 25% on Chinese made Electric Vehicles, on the basis that they have benefitted from illegal subsidies. This comes as a result of furious lobbying for higher or lower figures. ft.com/content/0545edβ¦
The US has imposed higher Chinese EV tariffs, without specific justification, and it was suggested 50% was needed in the EU to remove cost advantage. But some or more of this is natural competitive advantage from far earlier investment. The EU was looking as ever for a balance.
My suspicion has long been that China was broadly aware that politically the EU had to act, and that a 15-20% tariff on EV they were prepared to bear though with some retaliation because that's what happens in such cases. The furious lobbying came against much higher figures.
In we go... and just a few pages in, the relief is that there are none of the obvious errors than so often undermine UK accounts of Brexit - at likely cost to the sanity of @ShippersUnbound he appears on top of the subject...
Next UK negotiator perhaps...?
10 pages in and the level of haplessness described within the UK government system with regard to negotiations in 2017 is off the scale. I know we've improved since then. But equally, I doubt enough lessons have been learnt.
60 pages of systemic failure. There are probably many lessons to learn, but the two most obvious would be, listen to people who understand the EU, and know your objectives. Are either widely acknowledged in the UK as yet?
Increasingly thinking that Labour is going to need some clever way to handle the EU issue otherwise there is going to be a lot of difficulty and frustration spilling into government. And judging by my inbox, affecting negotiations. theguardian.com/commentisfree/β¦
Problem with these "we can't talk about it but we always talk about it" issues is that they don't go away, and particularly when they involve international talks with a player like the EU, you simply add levels of complexity potentially making it unmanageable.
Worse with UK-EU is the sheer number of players and subjects involved, and that both sides have unfinished emotional business. More on the EU side to come, but the fact every UK story generates reaction tells you this isn't all forgotten...