I was going to say it showed a high degree of confidence that they would never come to light, but then I realized that the revelation would have been seen as far more potentially damaging to Trump. The signatures are a weapon to keep him in line.
Their signatures, not his, are the kompromat.
Let's back up and talk about the trajectory of Trump's life and his business model, such as it is, for anyone who's puzzled over the significance of this beyond the mere fact that Trump entered into a partnership with sketchy people.
The thing you have to understand is that pointing out Trump's business bankruptcies is just the tip of the iceberg.
Trump, broadly speaking, has spent his whole life losing money. Other people's. He spends it as it runs out, to prop up his "billionaire" lifestyle.
Trump claims to be a self-made man "apart from a small loan of a million dollars" and that already makes him seem laughably out of touch, but we know now that even this was a lie.
He spent his father's fortune his whole life.
His first real estate venture at his father's feet lost money, though he claimed it was a success. He lied his way onto the Forbes 400 richest list. The compilers knew he was lying in the interview and assumed they could split the difference because he couldn't be lying THAT much
He spent, spent, spent to create the image of a successful tycoon. People bought into the name that his father had built and he had splashed around, and he didn't even bother trying to turn a profit because he wasn't living on the profits, he was living on the capital.
We all know he managed to bankrupt casinos, which are money-printing licenses, but it's not purely incompetence. He didn't try to make them work.
He lied to a casino company to get them to lend him *their* name (and legitimacy in the gambling world) while convincing them *his* name was the bigger asset, he lied to the NJ gaming commission that he was the lowest risk because he'd negotiate with the banks better...
...but then he financed his casino empire with high-interest junk bonds, because he had no intention of repaying them. When things went bad, the banks preferred having a solvent partner paying him back rather than forcing him to default and getting nothing.
So they refinanced him and they put him on an allowance.
His net worth was negative. His net worth was several hundred million dollars below zero. He was closed to an anti-billionaire.
And the banks he owed it to gave him an allowance.
They gave him an allowance because they wanted to prop him up as an apparently successful businessman in hopes he would turn the business around, while curtailing his spending.
He promptly bought his Marla a diamond ring, just to tell them they weren't the boss of him.
Now, just to point something out: he kind of hated her, she's the one who "trapped" him... and he FAMOUSLY hates the idea of buying jewelry because why would you give anyone who has the power to walk away from you any negotiable assets?
So he bought her jewelry with the banks' money out of spite, to be conspicuous, to tell them that they were suckers and he had them by the short hairs.
So, it may surprise you, but... eventually... banks stopped doing business with Trump.
But by that point, Trump didn't need banks! He and his followers say "He was rich enough to be his own bank!" but, no. He was spending whatever money he had, keeping up his lifestyle.
Which became his next bargaining chip.
Obviously the rich guy with his name all over the place is a successful businessman, so he got people to invest in his ventures. Outside investors. They gave him money, he spent their money on his lifestyle, ran the business venture into the ground.
It was The Producers.
While all this is going on, he's licensing his name. Meaning people are paying him to put his name on their thing, so people will associate it with his success.
He takes the money. Then points to these projects around the world as his, when he's courting investors.
A scam.
Donald Trump's lawyers argued in court at one point that due diligence is the duty of the investors, and thus, they should have looked into his business practices and track record before trusting him.
The judge agreed with that defense.
In other words, it became a matter of public record that investors should know better than to give Donald Trump money.
This may shock you, but he stopped being able to attract investors.
But while he had been doing this, he was constantly expanding his "empire". Licensing his name everywhere, becoming an aspirational figure so people would buy his merchandise, his books. Constantly starting ventures, always moving money around.
The Trump Org is called The Trump Org and not Trump, Inc. because it's... okay, you've heard of shell companies? Well, have you ever seen one of those weddings where the cake is like a tower of croquembouche? Just a bunch of puff pastry? That's Trump Org, without the cream fill.
It's a paper empire. A house of cards, and each card is a sole proprietorship or other closely held company that Trump instituted. He claims the same assets multiple times across each, he hides the liabilities, he makes them and then abandons them as needed.
There's credible reason to think he was laundering money even as far back as his casino days (him? turn down money?), but as he burned other big sources of "investment capital" to lose and spend he relied on it more and more.
Especially since during his father's lifetime, even with all the shell games he played, the main thing that kept him afloat was his father giving him money. That's the thing. He did all the fancy footwork and the razzle-dazzle... and it would have failed, should have failed.
But when his father died and he got his last big cash infusion, he was established enough to sell himself through The Apprentice and that helped, both getting him money and spreading his legendary image of success to new customers.
So this brings us to Deutsche Bank, organized crime, and Russian oligarchs.
Donald Trump ran saying that he was too rich to be bought, but in fact he has always been so broke he can't afford not to sell.
And by the early 21st century, his reputation among people with money was such that the only people who would give him money were both so shady to have few legitimate investment options and so powerful they credibly believed they could burn him back harder if he burned them.
What they aren't is suckers. They're not investing in Trump because they believe he'll make them money. But money laundering... if you've got $10 you can't spend in the US and you give it to him and he gives you back some agreed on fraction, that's the cost of doing business.
Better than money laundering is influence buying. Propping up the so-called president of these benighted states? They don't have to rely on him to "stay bought", because as long as they're funding his lifestyle he needs them, and as long as they can expose him, doubly so.
The legitimate banks couldn't have played Trump like this because he doesn't envy and admire them, which means he's incapable of fearing or respecting them.
Putin and the Russian oligarchs are Trump's aspirational figures, though.
And just as Trump's fans will put up with any indignity on the myth that they could become the next Trump, Trump will subordinate himself to others if he wants to believe it could get him to where they are.
So it's not just the idea that Trump went into partnership with these gangsters, that they went halfsies with him on some real estate ventures or they underwrote the costs.
The connection is their line of control over him.
I'm not saying that Putin or anyone else doesn't have more compromising material on Trump, but we should not underestimate how much the monetary ties themselves are "kompromat".
Even if he doesn't have to worry about embarrassment, even if he completely isolates himself from criminal liability... the power to control his purse strings gives them considerable leverage.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've got a doctor's appointment (fingers crossed for ADHD meds) and really hoping to make $100 today to start my week out. If anyone's got extra to help with that, I appreciate it
My psychiatrist recently ended her practice. My neurologist previously told me he's willing to take over my prescription, but getting ADHD meds is so fraught right now that I think I'm going to be anxious until it actually happens
Aside from getting the prescription, it always seems to be a toss-up whether the pharmacy will have them or I'll be waiting a month or more for them to come in... and my normal ADHD problems with focus and memory are so much worse now.
Hey, everyone. This is a long-overdue life update thread. Don't know how long it's going to go on, but I'd say there's a chance that I come back and add to it later on another day.
I've been trying to be more active here on Twitter in order to be more connected to people and events over here, my supporters and friends and the communities I've interacted with and been a part of.
But it's hard for me to be on here, and probably unhealthy.
I have so much anxiety each time I come here, and when I get past that and start looking around... I mean, we all know this site was designed to get engagement in the worst possible way, even before being run by someone determined to boost the worst possible people.
"How can one person be a they? It doesn't make sense."
Same way one person can be a he or she.
"Those words are singular."
No. Those words, like all words, are shapes and sounds. Words don't make any sense. Words don't do anything.
We make words, and we make sense of them.
There's all kinds of other arguments that favor the validity of singular they, including the fact that even people who claim it's a contradiction use it reflexively when the *only* thing they know about the unknown antecedent is that it's one singular person.
There's the argument about established use, where "they" has been used as a singular pronoun for longer than "you" was standardized as the second person singular; "you" is still grammatically plural, as in "She is one person. He is one person. You ARE one person."
Here's a reason I'm a pro-mockery of the OceanGate fiasco: that whole "regulations stifle innovation" thing that crops up in their PR to present the whole "untested and unlicensed" thing as a feature rather than a bug: people who want us eating heavy metals for breakfast say that
The idea that safety regulations and oversight are anti-business, anti-competition, anti-future, and anti-human survival (because the geniuses who would save us have their hands tied)... that's a huge and consequential part of right-wing/libertarian mythology.
And no, I'm not saying that libertarian and right-wing are the exact same thing. That's why I said both of them. Because they aren't exactly the same thing.
But there's a lot of areas where their goals and methods overlap perfectly, even if their professed beliefs do not.
Don't disagree with Representative Raskin here about the principle, but we all need to be ready for the fact that the GOP attacks on Joe Biden via Hunter aren't likely to stop or even change no matter what he does or does not do.
And counting on the people - even those who aren't specifically part of the right-wing echo chamber - to notice the disconnect and the hypocrisy... well, I mean, a lot counts on the media not blandly reporting/repeating the attacks like they're normal and well-founded.
The idea that is prevalent in so much of the media that the proper thing to do is amplify both sides and if one of them is absurd or dangerous, "the American people will see and decide that for themselves".
But to the extent they trust the news, they trust the news.
...and how much more it felt like I was getting something done and communicating ideas clearly in the thread vs. when I try to write even a "gallop draft" or Pratchettian 0th draft of actual mechanics.
So I'm going to give my brain a break by threading about the ideas more.
Two things I mentioned in that thread, about things a Paladin can mostly *just do*, the idea of a Paladin's vow having a supernatural ring of truth that is *just believed* here, and sensing the presence of deceit, are both part of two important aspects.