It's been over 24 hours since I tweeted this, about Saud Al Qahtani's fate. Many fine journalists have been on it since. There's been no official confirmation, but perhaps more importantly for me, no refutation either. At this point I'm choosing to post a thread with what I know:
Yesterday morning I received news that Saud Al Qahtani (SQ) had been poisoned to death by Mohammad bin Salman. The source is well placed and has been consistently reliable for nearly a year. I cannot publicly reveal anything else about this source.
In the course of yesterday I came to know that at least two other persons had received the same information, although in a different format. Both of these persons are accomplished professionals. I cannot confirm whether their source is the same as mine.
Additionally, at least two other people known to me had received, three days ago, news that SQ had "disappeared", with no further details. Again I cannot confirm whether their source for this is the same as mine.
I cannot repeat *all* of what I've been told, but highlights follow:
- MBS feels more threatened after @AgnesCallamard's UN report
- There's also been consistent pressure from the US to give up SQ. Pompeo pressuring the King and Kushner pressuring MBS
@AgnesCallamard Cont. what I was told:
- MBS finally took the drastic step of killing his own enforcer
- SQ died six days ago by cyanide poisoning
- MBS seems to have finally understood that SQ is a liability and is unlikely to give any future adviser as much power
@AgnesCallamard Cont. what I was told:
- My source mocked the choice of cyanide. "At least pick a method that's harder to trace"
- US admin knows everything, and are *not* happy
- After all, killing off SQ this way is essentially cognisense of guilt on MBS's behalf, won't make it go away
@AgnesCallamard Cont.:
- Also, going after your won enforcers is *never* a good idea for a dictator
- That said, had SQ been put in trial, he would have fought back and it would have implicated MBS
@AgnesCallamard After I put out the news yesterday, I reached out to two independent US intel linked sources. Within minutes, they both returned to me with confirmations that Saud Al Qahtani is dead and that his death will be spun as an overdose.
@AgnesCallamard Journalists who tried to reach out to official US intel sources did not receive any confirmation. This does not surprise me - my original source told me that while the Americans weren't happy, they promised MBS to keep the news classified until he himself reveals it.
@AgnesCallamard According to this, the US is giving MBS the opportunity to put his story out there first. If true this is consistent with US intel sources privately confirming vs officially "steering away".
@AgnesCallamard Gulf-based journalists are tightly controlled but have also been trying. One who spoke to a Saudi diplomat got this answer: "Someone called Saud Al Qahtani died, but then Qahtani is a big family and there are many people called Saud". I'm not even joking.
@AgnesCallamard Meanwhile activists have noted that the Saudi online propaganda engine has not pushed back against the news. "Twitter has been quiet for a week" - said a prominent Saudi influencer privately. The last time this happened was briefly in October 2018 when SQ was reshuffled.
@AgnesCallamard There's a complicated conspiracy theory (mere speculation, not heard from any source) saying SQ may be trying to fake his own death so that he can escape accountability. You can't be too paranoid about MBS and SQ, but one thing can decisively confirm: a funeral.
@AgnesCallamard Would there be a funeral? Is it possible for MBS to hide the news forever? Highly unlikely he would. Al-Qahtani is a huge and influential family, so if SQ died there will be a funeral. Even MBS opponents who died in the Ritz got funerals.
@AgnesCallamard How confident am I in all of this?
- My primary source has been consistently reliable
- Two US intel linked sources privately confirmed
- No pushback from Saudi propaganda machine on Twitter
- I'm convinced; but then again I'm not a newspaper
@AgnesCallamard Final point: @Twitter can confirm whether or not someone has recently logged into SQ's account (@saudq1978). I'm also pretty sure they won't. But if it's confirmed that he's dead, I think they should immediately lock the account.
@AgnesCallamard @Twitter @saudq1978 I understand journalists are in a very difficult situation on whether to run with the news because they cannot get a confirmation. And given that neither the US nor the Saudis will confirm, I don't think news platforms will be able to state this as a fact soon.
@AgnesCallamard @Twitter @saudq1978 Which brings me to the final point. Why did my original source leak to me? Well, it appears my source wanted the news to be out *before* MBS manages to spin it. They wanted to throw a wrench in MBS's plan/apparent agreement with US admin to allow him to run with it first.
@AgnesCallamard @Twitter @saudq1978 I wonder what MBS is thinking now that the news are out. I also wonder what a post-SQ world would look like for everyone - for the region, for dissidents, for human rights activists, for regular folks, and for MBS himself. So many analysis op-eds in my mind.
@AgnesCallamard @Twitter @saudq1978 SQ said "bring me the head of the dog" during Jamal's murder. This wasn't rhetorical, these were orders. SQ himself has said that he does nothing without orders from MBS - in fact, he tweeted as much:
@AgnesCallamard @Twitter @saudq1978 MBS is ultimately responsible for all of SQ's actions. MBS thought he'd get away from a murder by committing another. As for @saudq1978, it's quite a thing that his Twitter account's cover photo will forever be a picture of... his murderer.
@AgnesCallamard @Twitter @saudq1978 This is all I have for now. "End of Text" (as they say in Egypt lol). I'll try to answer your questions on here.
Maybe someone can directly ask the White House? Or Kushner specifically?
For the record this is also true. Khalid bin Salman is in the US, so is the Saudi intel chief. Wonder if this is on the agenda.
Here's how the story can be refuted: Establish that SQ is still alive. I wonder who's in a position to do so.
I may not get to revisit this tomorrow so here's final note for now. Based upon what I laid out above, I'm convinced. However we don't have decisive confirmation or refutation, and it may take a while. Let's see.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with İyad el-Baghdadi | إياد البغدادي

İyad el-Baghdadi | إياد البغدادي Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iyad_elbaghdadi

Dec 16
Here's a personal thread about the very strong, complex emotions that I struggled with all of last week, since we watched Assad fall and Syria rise:
(I've been working with my team on building systems that would enable me to post new content consistently & sustainably, and on multiple platforms. But I couldn't focus. I had to stop & check-in with myself. So let me acknowledge these emotions)
1. There's a nostalgic disorientation (or disoriented nostalgia?) - it's 13 years of our lives. The Syrian uprising & civil war has been a 13-year trauma. It started with immense hope and love, then tragedy, then an anger bordering on hate.
Read 15 tweets
Dec 9
Israel's immediate reaction to the fall of the Assad regime is mass bombardment of Syrian army bases and expansion into Syrian territory. This tells you two things:
First: Israel saw no security threat from Assad's regime - they had a tacit understanding and Assad always stayed within the lines. So long Assad was in power, Israel had no need to take out his weapons depots or aircraft fleets, or to create a further buffer zone.
Second, Israel and its allies (primarily the US) has/have no political or diplomatic leverage whatsoever over the emergent forces in Syria, and considers them a hostile threat.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 17, 2023
The rupture in international solidarity communities (that tried to integrate Western + Global South activists) is deep. The rupture in the small Israeli-Palestinian solidarity communities is catastrophic. It'll take a decade to fix what happened in the last two months, if at all.
I'm starting to become convinced that many movements will not survive this and will have to be mourned and laid to rest, and new movements built out of what remains. Built on better principles, with more moral courage and clearer-eyed vision.
It's starting to feel like we're going to end up with entirely parallel communities. Parallel, non-overlapping movements, institutions, narratives, ecosystems, public spheres. A disaster in itself - but really, it sets the stage for enormous, cataclysmic disasters in the future.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 6, 2023
Here's a thread about the concept of indigeneity in historical Palestine and its implications in light of Zionist settler-colonialism and the persecution of the Palestinians. You may want to bookmark this for whenever someone screams "but Jews are indigenous to the land!" 🧵
Note: This thread is not an attack on Jewish life in the Middle East. It's an analytical critique of the narratives used. My argument is that indigeneity is not an appropriate framing to use in the Israel-Palestine context, but especially when used (aggressively) by Zionists
"Indigenous populations" is a term used to refers to the survivors of settler-colonialism, particularly in contexts where settlers overpowered and nearly eradicated the natives. The text below is from a factsheet by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII) Image
Read 18 tweets
Nov 30, 2023
A long thread about colonialism, decolonization, what models can & can't work, and why the Israel-Palestine context is unique. I wish people would slow-read this because many are walking around with outdated models, and may be causing damage 🧵
Caveat: I wrote this as a stream of consciousness with minimum editing so please forgive me if this ends up being meandering or repetitive or choppy. I just find that I write more powerfully and authentically when I'm not trying to edit anything or make it sound good
Let me start from here: There's a subtle but very important difference between "to colonize" and "to colonialize". I know that in some contexts, the words are used interchangeably. But in key ways they are *not*. I cringe when people confuse them.
Read 47 tweets
Nov 27, 2023
A lot has been said recently about what Islam allows or prohibits in war so I thought I'd clarify this: In Islam the distinction is not "civilian vs military"; it's "combatant vs non-combatant". Here's a quick explanation
In the classical Islamic era, the distinction of civilian vs non-civilian didn't exist. Neither the Prophet nor his tribal adversaries had standing armies made up of full-time soldiers. Armies at the time were made of men of fighting age who otherwise were traders, farmers, etc.
Rather, the distinction the Prophet established was combatant vs non-combatant. One of the clearest examples is narrated in a hadith that describes the scene after a battle (the battle itself isn't named)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(