It's been over 24 hours since I tweeted this, about Saud Al Qahtani's fate. Many fine journalists have been on it since. There's been no official confirmation, but perhaps more importantly for me, no refutation either. At this point I'm choosing to post a thread with what I know:
Yesterday morning I received news that Saud Al Qahtani (SQ) had been poisoned to death by Mohammad bin Salman. The source is well placed and has been consistently reliable for nearly a year. I cannot publicly reveal anything else about this source.
In the course of yesterday I came to know that at least two other persons had received the same information, although in a different format. Both of these persons are accomplished professionals. I cannot confirm whether their source is the same as mine.
Additionally, at least two other people known to me had received, three days ago, news that SQ had "disappeared", with no further details. Again I cannot confirm whether their source for this is the same as mine.
I cannot repeat *all* of what I've been told, but highlights follow:
- MBS feels more threatened after @AgnesCallamard's UN report
- There's also been consistent pressure from the US to give up SQ. Pompeo pressuring the King and Kushner pressuring MBS
@AgnesCallamard Cont. what I was told:
- MBS finally took the drastic step of killing his own enforcer
- SQ died six days ago by cyanide poisoning
- MBS seems to have finally understood that SQ is a liability and is unlikely to give any future adviser as much power
@AgnesCallamard Cont. what I was told:
- My source mocked the choice of cyanide. "At least pick a method that's harder to trace"
- US admin knows everything, and are *not* happy
- After all, killing off SQ this way is essentially cognisense of guilt on MBS's behalf, won't make it go away
@AgnesCallamard Cont.:
- Also, going after your won enforcers is *never* a good idea for a dictator
- That said, had SQ been put in trial, he would have fought back and it would have implicated MBS
@AgnesCallamard After I put out the news yesterday, I reached out to two independent US intel linked sources. Within minutes, they both returned to me with confirmations that Saud Al Qahtani is dead and that his death will be spun as an overdose.
@AgnesCallamard Journalists who tried to reach out to official US intel sources did not receive any confirmation. This does not surprise me - my original source told me that while the Americans weren't happy, they promised MBS to keep the news classified until he himself reveals it.
@AgnesCallamard According to this, the US is giving MBS the opportunity to put his story out there first. If true this is consistent with US intel sources privately confirming vs officially "steering away".
@AgnesCallamard Gulf-based journalists are tightly controlled but have also been trying. One who spoke to a Saudi diplomat got this answer: "Someone called Saud Al Qahtani died, but then Qahtani is a big family and there are many people called Saud". I'm not even joking.
@AgnesCallamard Meanwhile activists have noted that the Saudi online propaganda engine has not pushed back against the news. "Twitter has been quiet for a week" - said a prominent Saudi influencer privately. The last time this happened was briefly in October 2018 when SQ was reshuffled.
@AgnesCallamard There's a complicated conspiracy theory (mere speculation, not heard from any source) saying SQ may be trying to fake his own death so that he can escape accountability. You can't be too paranoid about MBS and SQ, but one thing can decisively confirm: a funeral.
@AgnesCallamard Would there be a funeral? Is it possible for MBS to hide the news forever? Highly unlikely he would. Al-Qahtani is a huge and influential family, so if SQ died there will be a funeral. Even MBS opponents who died in the Ritz got funerals.
@AgnesCallamard How confident am I in all of this?
- My primary source has been consistently reliable
- Two US intel linked sources privately confirmed
- No pushback from Saudi propaganda machine on Twitter
- I'm convinced; but then again I'm not a newspaper
@AgnesCallamard Final point: @Twitter can confirm whether or not someone has recently logged into SQ's account (@saudq1978). I'm also pretty sure they won't. But if it's confirmed that he's dead, I think they should immediately lock the account.
@AgnesCallamard@Twitter@saudq1978 I understand journalists are in a very difficult situation on whether to run with the news because they cannot get a confirmation. And given that neither the US nor the Saudis will confirm, I don't think news platforms will be able to state this as a fact soon.
@AgnesCallamard@Twitter@saudq1978 Which brings me to the final point. Why did my original source leak to me? Well, it appears my source wanted the news to be out *before* MBS manages to spin it. They wanted to throw a wrench in MBS's plan/apparent agreement with US admin to allow him to run with it first.
@AgnesCallamard@Twitter@saudq1978 I wonder what MBS is thinking now that the news are out. I also wonder what a post-SQ world would look like for everyone - for the region, for dissidents, for human rights activists, for regular folks, and for MBS himself. So many analysis op-eds in my mind.
@AgnesCallamard@Twitter@saudq1978 SQ said "bring me the head of the dog" during Jamal's murder. This wasn't rhetorical, these were orders. SQ himself has said that he does nothing without orders from MBS - in fact, he tweeted as much:
@AgnesCallamard@Twitter@saudq1978 MBS is ultimately responsible for all of SQ's actions. MBS thought he'd get away from a murder by committing another. As for @saudq1978, it's quite a thing that his Twitter account's cover photo will forever be a picture of... his murderer.
@AgnesCallamard@Twitter@saudq1978 This is all I have for now. "End of Text" (as they say in Egypt lol). I'll try to answer your questions on here.
Maybe someone can directly ask the White House? Or Kushner specifically?
For the record this is also true. Khalid bin Salman is in the US, so is the Saudi intel chief. Wonder if this is on the agenda.
Here's how the story can be refuted: Establish that SQ is still alive. I wonder who's in a position to do so.
I may not get to revisit this tomorrow so here's final note for now. Based upon what I laid out above, I'm convinced. However we don't have decisive confirmation or refutation, and it may take a while. Let's see.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, the 12-day war between Israel (& the US) vs Iran seems to be over, and the ceasefire seems to be holding. Here's a thread assessing what has changed, what didn't change, and what may be next:
Since it's Israel who started this war, let's start with its war aims (declared & assumed):
- End Iran's nuclear program
- Regime change
- Kill Iran-US negotiations for a new deal
- Drag the US in
- Distract from Gaza
- Stop Europe’s 2SS push
So, was Iran's nuclear program stopped?
Expert consensus is forming around "no". The facilities were damaged but not fully destroyed. The US telegraphed its attacks early enough that Iran moved not just the uranium, but likely the centrifuges too.
A quick situational update after the US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities. Events might to accelerate, so I'm hoping to give you a snapshot of how things stand as of the time of writing this thread.
The US warned Iran ahead of its attacks - we have confirmation of this from US, Iranian, and Arab sources. The same reporting says the strike was one-off and now over, with the US seeking negotiations and explicitly denying intent to pursue regime change.
What about the damage? The Iranian authorities had already evacuated key sites and moved enriched uranium elsewhere. Early assessments show proven surface-level damage but no confirmed destruction of underground infrastructure. The Iranian nuclear program has not been "ended".
Excellent question by @vali_nasr. Here's a thread about Iran's nuclear program, why it's so hard to "destroy", and why "Fordow" is really about dragging the US into war:
Let's start with the basics. To have a nuclear program, a country needs:
- Uranium reserves
- The ability to mine ore & process it
- Centrifuges to enrich it
- Technical know-how to run the cycle
Iran has all of these *domestically*. Natively.
The way uranium is enriched is to first convert it into gas (UF₆) and then pass it through a cascade of centrifuges (which are basically fast-spinning cylinders) until it reaches a certain purity.
It's technically demanding, but not impossibly complicated.
Here's a big-picture geopolitical thread on Israel's war on Iran - its possibilities, impossibilities, dynamics, and delusions. My goal is to give you a full big-picture view in one place, which is why this is a long thread. If you prefer drip-fed updates, skip this thread.
Caveat: Most geopolitical analysis is cold and state-centric. This thread is rooted in collective liberation. Remember as you read: Israel's regime is genocidal. Iran's is a theocratic tyranny. If clear moral language makes you uncomfortable, scroll back to WSJ or CNN.
There are points where the thread touches on topics that deserve a deeper dive, or hints at arguments that require a fuller explanation. I've marked these with the door emoji. Where you see this:🚪, it means there's a door we can choose to walk into - later.
Hello everyone, emerging to drop some comments about Trump's recent statements about Gaza. I have limited time so I'd rather dump a quick analysis into a single meandering thread, sorry in advance
So: Trump, with a smirking Netanyahu sitting next to him, said he thinks Gaza should be ethnically cleansed, bulldozed, and then turned into a US-controlled "riviera." The comments have horrified and alarmed many people.
Netanyahu said they were "the first good idea he's heard"
This has zero chance of happening, but let's use this as an opportunity to explore how the region has changed since Oct 7th and how the world has changed since 2017 when Trump began his first term.
Here's a personal thread about the very strong, complex emotions that I struggled with all of last week, since we watched Assad fall and Syria rise:
(I've been working with my team on building systems that would enable me to post new content consistently & sustainably, and on multiple platforms. But I couldn't focus. I had to stop & check-in with myself. So let me acknowledge these emotions)
1. There's a nostalgic disorientation (or disoriented nostalgia?) - it's 13 years of our lives. The Syrian uprising & civil war has been a 13-year trauma. It started with immense hope and love, then tragedy, then an anger bordering on hate.