Van Grack denied that there was any Brady material in the production.
Powell disagreed - and argued that the prosecutors should be HELD IN CONTEMPT!
This motion threatens not only their prosecution of @GenFlynn, but their careers and their professional reputations.
They haven't filed their response yet.
But the NYT has.
How could @adamgoldmanNYT know that?
As we discussed above, the relevant evidence was produced on August 16th - under a protective order!
Goldman argues that @SidneyPowell1's filing could "anger" Judge Sullivan.
Why wouldn't Judge Sullivan be angrier about the alleged Brady violations?
Nowhere in her brief does @SidneyPowell1 refer to a deep state.
But Goldman doesn't care.
Speculation by whom? When? Why?
Not mentioned. Goldman provides no evidence for this claim.
That makes his claim - shall we say - unfounded?
He notes that Powell is seeking a security clearance to review @GenFlynn's classified conversations with Sergey Kislyak.
Then he discusses the contents of those transcripts - which he apparently knows!
How does @adamgoldmanNYT know the contents of classified NSA transcripts relevant to Flynn's culpability?
And how can he argue with a straight face that @sidneypowell1 has filed an "unfounded" motion - to see those very transcripts?
She's @GenFlynn's LAWYER!
I attended this hearing back in December 2018.
Judge Sullivan criticized @GenFlynn's lawyers, counsel from Covington & Burling.
Not Flynn himself.
And that was because - in the same papers - Flynn was admitting guilt.
The statement of offense includes discussion of "knowing" lies with regard to his FBI interview.
NOT his FARA filing on Turkey.
Judge Sullivan has scheduled a hearing September 10th, here in DC.
I'll be there.
Should be explosive.
Because Judge Sullivan doesn't like crooked prosecutors.