Also note how the piece has exactly *nothing* to say about Veritas being subject to an FBI raid for practicing *actual* journalism
I remember @adamgoldmanNYT gleefully reporting about how James O’Keefe got dragged from his apartment in handcuffs, but all of a sudden a judge says “hey you can’t just publish your adversary’s privileged info” and NOW there’s a threat to the First Amendment
NYT delenda est
Their best argument is “well in the future people could just file frivolous defamation lawsuits and use that to get a prior restraint” as though judges are robots incapable of detecting bad faith
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Whenever establishment Dems talk about the need to “protect democracy” or about how “democracy is in danger” just substitute the word “oligarchy” in for “democracy” and it will actually make sense
Incoherent: “I’m for democracy, but against populism!”
Coherent: “I’m for oligarchy and against populism.”
Alex Vindman thought he was “protecting democracy” by using the bureaucracy to subvert the elected President of the United States
I think he's already alienated a number of jurors and that the most likely outcome here is a very quick not guilty on all counts
"Rosenbaum didn't reach for the weapon!"
"There's no evidence that Rosenbaum threatened Rittenhouse!"
These aren't just lies, they are dumb lies
Jury has watched the video of Rosenbaum lunging for Rittenhouse's gun probably a hundred times in the last two weeks, along with Richie's testimony it's a slam dunk
Binger fighting this fact in closing just makes him look ridiculous