So just imagine you are a UK civil servant turned up at your office today - if your holiday wasn't cancelled to cope with no deal planning...
first up you check your civil service code to remind yourself that you work for the Government of the day - but you are also supposed to "comply with the law and uphold the administration of justice"
what if you are asked to do things that you think violate the Code.. well then you are supposed to resolve it through an appeal to the Civil Service Commission .. and if that does not work, you resign (tough luck) gov.uk/government/pub…
BTW you are supposed to report criminal or unlawful activity to the police...
But how does this apply if govt is ignoring a law rather than acting in contravention of it? Interesting question for the Cabinet Secretary
Meanwhile, if you are a diplomat promoting "Global Britain" values, work for @tradegovuk promoting the UK's stable legal environment (or adherence to a rules based system), your job just got a whole lot tougher...
Woe you if you work for @DFID_UK on good governance, promoting the importance of democratic institutions and the rule of law, Ministers have managed to cut the moral high ground from beneath your feet
and ditto if you work for one of the law and order depts... if Ministers can pick and choose the laws they obey, why can't the rest of us..
Have Ministers really thought through the consequences of what they say - even a Minister usually as thoughtful as @michaelgove .....
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
with news Boris Johnson might be making a come back, good time for @UKandEU to publish a stocktake on how far we have got on his 2019 promise to "Get Brexit done" - an in depth look at how the state has adapted to Brexit. ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/upl…
First we look at the impact on the size and shape of the civil service: lots more people - numbers up by over 100k since 2016. Not all Brexit of course - covid, asylum etc. But a lot are. And a lot of those are long-term jobs. Brexit = British bureaucrats
We've had a turbulent time since the referendum. Lots of political change. But lots of machinery of government changes as well. Remember DExEU? We now (probably) have reached the end of post-Brexit Mogging with the creation of @biztradegovuk
Watching HoL constitution committee with @nickmacpherson2@marksedwill and former first civil service commissioner on dismissal of perm secs. Nick says always been removals but volume has gone up and notes Scholar removed preemptively by Kwarteng
Note that @AlexGAThomas and I gave evidence earlier to this. Sedwill also points out similar dismissal of his successor as national security adviser "equally damaging".
Sedwill suggests cttee should investigate the "underlying reasons" for the increase in the number of removals. Sedwill says due to a "mix" of reasons. Since coalition PM can choose from all the appointable candidates emerging from CSC-led process.
This is very good from @DavidGauke. To pick up and expand on one point. When I was in private office, I saw my role as shielding the minister from sub-standard advice. I would tell my fellow civil servants their stuff was not good enough to put in.
@DavidGauke same message - but very different when coming from a relatively junior civil servant than from a minister. And if someone was poor in a meeting, we'd call them or their boss afterwards saying the minister was unimpressed and they needed to up their game
@DavidGauke and if we had a serious issue, we would tell their boss that the minister had lost confidence in X and they needed to sort it. Or haul in the permanent secretary.
Was annoyed at 7.00 and annoyed again at 8.00 by @BBCr4today news presentation of the "aid cap". There is no "aid cap". There was a legislated target of 0.7% GDP to be spent on aid.. a target, not a "cap". No maximum
Rishi Sunak reduced that to 0.5% "temporarily" without legislating. Now looked as though that will be baked in to future forecasts. But then we found out govt is classifying lots of UK spend on refugees as "aid"
That spending is going up -- why UK will score itself as spending more on "aid" - perhaps breaking the cash limit (because it can't cut other aid enough to accommodate it).
Another day - remembering back to the leadership election of 2019. @DavidGauke told us why the Conservatives went for the by then unstoppable Boris Johnson
Brexit party chair Richard Tice told us how ABB - Anyone but Boris had changed post those disastrous (for the Conservatives) European elections - and "did for the Brexit party"
.@OwenPaterson claimed credit for Johnson's win for the ERG
In two weeks time Boris Johnson will be replaced as Prime Minister.. but he has been a critical political figure of the past decade so over the next fortnight I am going to dip into @UKandEU#Brexitwitnessarchive to paint a picture of him
Lets start with early Johnson. Former Eurocrat Jonathan Faull told us why there might have been a presumption that Johnson would understand Europe and the EU
But of course, his journalism in Brussels was about identifying comedy examples of EU red tape - it was on such a hunt that @OwenPaterson first encountered him and gives insight into his journalistic technique