Biblically speaking, "false teaching" is more than an incorrect propositional belief about some aspect of Christian doctrine. It is not a simple interpretive mistake; it is an act of volition that stems from spiritual immaturity, unbelief, arrogance, and illicit desire.
First, false teaching preys on the spiritually immature. Paul repeatedly expresses concern for the minds of believers who may be “led astray” by belief in a different Jesus, a different spirit, and a different gospel (2 Cor. 11:3–4; cf. Gal. 1:6–7).
Second, false teaching can be the product of distorted interpretations of Scripture by those not firmly established in the truth. Some pervert the meaning of Scriptures that are “hard to understand,” doing so “to their own destruction” (2 Pet. 3:16).
Third, false teaching grows out of ungodly ambition, ignorance, and conceit. Paul warned about those who “wandered away into vain discussion, desiring to be teachers of the law, without understanding either what they are saying” (1 Tim. 1:6–7).
Fourth, false teaching sometimes stems from a desire for material gain (2 Pet. 2:3; 2 Cor. 2:17). This tendency is very apparent in the modern world, where televangelists and prosperity preachers prey upon the underprivileged to finance their extravagant lifestyles.
Fifth, false teaching can result from and lead to inappropriate sensuality and sexual immorality (Rom. 16:18; 2 Pet. 2:2; Rev. 2:20; 2:14; Jude 16; 2 Tim. 4:3).
Sixth, false teaching is sometimes attributed to demonic deception. Some who depart the faith do so because they pay attention “to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons” (1 Tim. 4:1).
Seventh, false teachers seek to divide the body of Christ. Paul cautioned the church at Rome about “those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught” (Rom. 16:17).
Finally, false teaching can come from apostates and deviant teachers within the church. False teachers from “among the people [en tō laō] . . . secretly bring in destructive heresies” (2 Pet. 2:1).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rhyne Putman

Rhyne Putman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rhyneputman

Jul 31, 2021
My wife was fully vaccinated with Moderna in May.

She tested positive for COVID yesterday.

Her symptoms have been relatively mild compared to many others I know who had the virus before or without the vaccine.

I’m grateful for God’s providence and the gift of medicine.
Micah is the type who gets a flu shot every year and still gets the flu every couple of years.

We’ve come to learn that vaccines aren’t magic forcefields that prevent illness but treatments that *can* minimize the effects of a disease or a virus.
Like any other medical treatment, it is imperfect.

Medical science, like every other form of science, is a tentative, ongoing project subject to changes in theory and practice as new data comes available.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 4, 2020
A few traits characterize the theologians, pastors, and students I know who have walked away from their faith. They “loved human praise more than praise from God” (John 12:43). They often seemed more concerned about being open-minded than having their minds renewed (Rom 12:2).
They often flexed their scholarly muscles in study but were lethargic in ministering to the church or the needs of others. Their lifestyles showed patterns of sinful decadence rather than the pursuit of holiness, and their love for God grew cold (Matt 24:12).
Worst of all, they seemed bored by the gospel. The cross of Christ no longer seemed to stir their affections.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 12, 2020
On the subject of “biblical masculinity”:

There was a time in my life when I truly felt out of place for not conforming to particular “masculine” stereotypes.

I was never athletic and generally uninterested in sports as a kid. (In God’s goodness, I love sports now.) /1
I ran the other direction when my dad tried to show me how to fix things. I couldn’t wait to go inside and play Nintendo. Honestly, I wish I had paid more attention. I’m still playing catch-up. /2
I didn’t hunt or fish. The thought of it bored me (and still does). /3
Read 20 tweets
Aug 10, 2020
For the record, I can disagree with the approach taken by John MacArthur to church meetings and simultaneously (1) appreciate his ministry and (2) respect his right to hold in-person services without fear of government reprisal. /1
Dr. MacArthur has done many great things for the kingdom I will gladly acknowledge. I have been to his church before and am grateful for the students I have known out of Master's Seminary. /2
But I still don't think having a full, unmasked sanctuary is wise for multiple reasons. That is my conviction. Along the same lines, I don't think government has the place to tell the people of God what to do. /3
Read 10 tweets
Jul 16, 2020
We can affirm the objectivity of biblical truth AND acknowledge we are finite interpreters shaped by our time and place in history.

We can acknowledge the author-given meaning of biblical texts AND apply the text in different ways in different cultural settings.
The hard work of hermeneutics helps us alleviate misunderstandings of Scripture, but it doesn’t guarantee infallible interpretations of Scripture.
For example, Western interpreters struggle to make sense of 1 Cor. 8:1-13 because (1) we are chronologically far removed from the cultural practice of meat offered to idols ane (2) we are culturally far removed from this practice as well.
Read 8 tweets
May 22, 2020
I appreciate the contribution Gadamer makes to our understanding of hermeneutics and interpretation, but what do I know? I only bothered to read his work.
Seriously though, Gadamer has a more "conservative" group of interpreters and a more "radical" group of interpreters. I have been more influenced by the former than the latter, people like Thiselton and Vanhoozer.
It is true that Gadamer doesn't take meaning to be simply what the author says, but that is because he takes meaning as a total interpretive event between the horizon of the author (text) and the horizon of the reader.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(