Her symptoms have been relatively mild compared to many others I know who had the virus before or without the vaccine.
I’m grateful for God’s providence and the gift of medicine.
Micah is the type who gets a flu shot every year and still gets the flu every couple of years.
We’ve come to learn that vaccines aren’t magic forcefields that prevent illness but treatments that *can* minimize the effects of a disease or a virus.
Like any other medical treatment, it is imperfect.
Medical science, like every other form of science, is a tentative, ongoing project subject to changes in theory and practice as new data comes available.
While I believe it prudent and wise for most people to be vaccinated—there are exceptions—I also believe talk of mandatory vaccinations are serious infringements of personal liberties (ironically being lobbied for by the “my body, my choice” pro-choice crowd).
I absolutely hate that this has become such a political hot button issue, where confirmation bias dominates decision making. It shouldn’t be.
Believers can model a healthier way of expressing disagreements about this issue.
We can talk freely and respectfully about concerns some have related to potential side effects.
We can talk freely and respectfully about the value of a mostly vaccinated public.
We can leave room for legitimate disagreements and still genuinely care for one another, sharing the concerns of our neighbors, being empathetic without caving to fear or carelessness.
Once more, I am grateful to live in a moment in history when God has given us the gifts of medical science and personal freedoms. These two things can be pitted against each other, but they needn’t be.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few traits characterize the theologians, pastors, and students I know who have walked away from their faith. They “loved human praise more than praise from God” (John 12:43). They often seemed more concerned about being open-minded than having their minds renewed (Rom 12:2).
They often flexed their scholarly muscles in study but were lethargic in ministering to the church or the needs of others. Their lifestyles showed patterns of sinful decadence rather than the pursuit of holiness, and their love for God grew cold (Matt 24:12).
Worst of all, they seemed bored by the gospel. The cross of Christ no longer seemed to stir their affections.
There was a time in my life when I truly felt out of place for not conforming to particular “masculine” stereotypes.
I was never athletic and generally uninterested in sports as a kid. (In God’s goodness, I love sports now.) /1
I ran the other direction when my dad tried to show me how to fix things. I couldn’t wait to go inside and play Nintendo. Honestly, I wish I had paid more attention. I’m still playing catch-up. /2
I didn’t hunt or fish. The thought of it bored me (and still does). /3
For the record, I can disagree with the approach taken by John MacArthur to church meetings and simultaneously (1) appreciate his ministry and (2) respect his right to hold in-person services without fear of government reprisal. /1
Dr. MacArthur has done many great things for the kingdom I will gladly acknowledge. I have been to his church before and am grateful for the students I have known out of Master's Seminary. /2
But I still don't think having a full, unmasked sanctuary is wise for multiple reasons. That is my conviction. Along the same lines, I don't think government has the place to tell the people of God what to do. /3
We can affirm the objectivity of biblical truth AND acknowledge we are finite interpreters shaped by our time and place in history.
We can acknowledge the author-given meaning of biblical texts AND apply the text in different ways in different cultural settings.
The hard work of hermeneutics helps us alleviate misunderstandings of Scripture, but it doesn’t guarantee infallible interpretations of Scripture.
For example, Western interpreters struggle to make sense of 1 Cor. 8:1-13 because (1) we are chronologically far removed from the cultural practice of meat offered to idols ane (2) we are culturally far removed from this practice as well.
I appreciate the contribution Gadamer makes to our understanding of hermeneutics and interpretation, but what do I know? I only bothered to read his work.
Seriously though, Gadamer has a more "conservative" group of interpreters and a more "radical" group of interpreters. I have been more influenced by the former than the latter, people like Thiselton and Vanhoozer.
It is true that Gadamer doesn't take meaning to be simply what the author says, but that is because he takes meaning as a total interpretive event between the horizon of the author (text) and the horizon of the reader.
We affirm the classical Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura. We recognize Scripture as the supreme source and only guiding norm of Christian theology, /2
@kswhitfield but we are also appreciative of the roles tradition, reason, and experience play in shaping the Christian worldview. /3