(Thread) Orwell's 1984 showed us why⤵️

“Without truth, we can’t speak truth to power, so there is only power” @jasonintrator

Shared truth makes rule of law—and democracy—possible.

This Rand Study explains how to fight Trump's effort to torpedo truth:
rand.org/pubs/perspecti…
@jasonintrator 1/ The Firehose of Falsehood is a Russian technique that
builds on Soviet methods— but modern tools make it more effective: The Internet, social media, and amateur journalism outlets.

The Firehose of Falsehoods is “rapid and continuous” stream of lies.
rand.org/pubs/perspecti…
@jasonintrator 2/ Here’s the part that’s key:
The liar has a “shameless willingness” to tell outrageous lies that everyone knows are lies.

The liar doesn’t care about consistency.
He doesn’t care if it’s obvious he’s lying.
rand.org/pubs/perspecti…
In fact, that's the whole point.
@jasonintrator 3/ The more shameless the better.

@TimothyDSnyder tells how reporters were often so astonished by Putin's outrageous (and deliberate) lies, that they focused on the lies instead of Putin's latest atrocities.

The lies became the news.
The actual news gets pushed off the stage.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 4/ The goal is the “disruption of truthful reporting and messaging.”
rand.org/pubs/perspecti…

From Snyder: The 20th century method replaced the truth with myth.

Today Trump and Putin replace the truth with cynicism:
People eventually give up trying to sort out truth from lies.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 5/ The method goes with “You’re the Puppet.”⤵️

Putin tells the people, “Yes, your leaders lie. But others also lie. So you may as well stay with your liar, instead of the enemy liar.”

Notice how this creates tribalism.
He's a liar, but he's OUR liar.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 6/ How do I know Trump is doing it on purpose?

Because Steve Bannon has been in Brazil coaching Bolsonaro (the Brazilian Trump) to do the same thing.
mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-…
They’re all buddies and learn from each other.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 7/ Bannon explains it this way ⤵️


Trump is a natural at the Firehose of Falsehoods method.
He’s been lying all his life.

From the Rand study: The Firehose of Falsehood technique “entertains, confuses and overwhelms the audience.”
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 8/ Notice "entertains." Trump’s supporters cheer the constant chaos👇


By the way, I don’t believe the stories about how Trump is losing it and melting down and is heading for a breakdown.

We’ve been hearing that for years.

I think it’s part of the con.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 9/ OK, so how to we combat this?

From the Rand study: While we must refute the falsehoods, “retractions and refutations are seldom effective.”

“Don’t expect to counter the Firehose of Falsehood with a squirt gun of truth.”(p.9)
rand.org/pubs/perspecti…

Instead put on raincoats.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 10/ If people expect to be drenched in lies, they can better withstand the effects.

The next step is to counter the effects of the lies.

The effect of Trump’s lies is to undermine and destroy democracy.

So we move quickly to strengthen democracy⤵️
terikanefield-blog.com/things-to-do/
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 11/ The worst thing we can do is become cynical—because Trump is trying to draw you in to cynicism.

“It’s too late!” Or “there’s nothing we can do” are the death knells of democracy.

The whole point of Active Measures is to get people to lose faith in democracy.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 12/ Jeremy, I don’t think his outrageous lies this week will change anything.


I think by now people have made up their minds about Trump.

If you look at his approval rating over the past 2.5 years, it’s remained fairly constant. (Link in next tweet).
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder 13/ 538’s aggregate keeps me from getting distracted by outlier polls. (@NateSilver538 explains his methods, if you're not familiar with his aggregate.)
projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval…

The GOP leadership who haven’t jumped ship yet aren't likely to jump over a new set of lies.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538 14/ In the end, the only thing that will hurt Trump is a bloodbath in Nov. 2020.

The signs point toward a GOP drubbing in 2020.

The GOP demographics are shrinking. The GOP is splintering into conservatives v. reactionaries⤵️
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538 15. So we need to:

💠fight the cynicism that can come from the NOAA staff altering the truth to suit the president,
💠expect more shameless and outrageous lies, and
💠get busy strengthening democracy⤵️
(the democracy is ours.)
terikanefield-blog.com/things-to-do/

End/
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538 He's been doing the same thing for years⤵️

Does he have some dementia?
Probably.
Does dementia explain what we're seeing? No.

I think the discussion of Trump's declining mental state is a distraction, like playing an endless game of whack-a-lie . . .
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538 . . I've suspected he drops misspelled words into his tweets on purpose to watch everyone go into a spin. When his critics mock him for misspelling words, it enrages his fans, who cast Trump's critics as elitist.

Also, remember, there's a lot of variation in dementia.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538
That's why, this next year, I'm not volunteering in detention centers, as important as that is.

I'm putting all my spare time into voter protection work.
Winning big in 2020 is the most effective way to end the nightmare.

Impeachment . . .
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538 . . . which I believe will happen, won't end the nightmare.

It's possible, but unlikely, that the Senate will remove Trump from office.

If they do, meet President Pence.

A drubbing in 2020 is the only way to turn the ship around.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538 I suspect this is true, but in the end, we don't know.


I am a lawyer, so I like to follow rules.

Like the Goldwater Rule.

What's that?

I'll attach a link in the next tweet.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538 The Goldwater Rule:
npr.org/sections/healt…
American Psychiatric Association doesn't want armchair psych evaluations on public figures.
A true evaluation requires more.

That's why I say focus on solutions by seeing the behavior in the context of well known propaganda methods.
@jasonintrator @TimothyDSnyder @NateSilver538 I see in that people misunderstand the point of the rule.

The point is that the public is not in a position to make an accurate psychiatric evaluation.

Even a psychiatrist can't make an evaluation without actually examining the patient.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Feb 21
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.

1/
Some background:

After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality.
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…

2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”

Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."

rt.com/uk/429777-kati…

3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
Trump lost in court THREE MORE TIMES today.

Trump tried to get all three of these cases⤵️ dismissed and lost. I analyzed one of the cases last April, Blassingame, here: (Transcript on my blog.)

He tends not to do well in court, where facts matter.

1/
The defendants made the following arguments (screenshot #1)

Trump also claims, among other things, that he has absolute immunity. (#2)

It turns out that the absolute immunity question isn't as easy as you might think (but Trump still lost).

2/
If you want to get caught up on one of the cases, my analysis from last April is here:terikanefield.com/blassingame-v-…

And here:

You can read the court's decision here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 16
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.

Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.

#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said

Me = 🤦‍♀️

Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."

Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."

There is no "I don't know how to read" defense.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
For this week’s blog post, I edited and combined a few of my recent threads.

I started with a reading of the newly unredacted sections of the Mueller report, then talked about some of the responses on Twitter . . .

terikanefield.com/is-social-medi…
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.



It's too easy for truth to lose, and when truth loses, democracy loses.
Right. And not all "manipulators" are bad actors, but all people need to learn to evaluate sources.

Reflectively saying, "Professor X should know" is not how to do it. It takes more work. Falling in line is always easier than doing the work.

Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
I'm tired of the word "accountable." It's a weasel word. Don't say "accountable." Say what you mean.

Does "accountable" mean
🔹Lose elections?
🔹Go to prison?
🔹Lose a lawsuit?
🔹Be hated?

It would be nice if all the good people were rewarded and the bad people punished.
So you want to start indicting people and gather the evidence after they're indicted?

Or not worry about evidence?

There are rules of evidence, which means that the stuff you've read in newspapers and Tweets probably isn't admissible in court . . .
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 12
One reason I think social media is turning everyone into authoritarians: people don't read or think.

They see a headline and have a strong emotional reaction, which they Tweet and which then gets repeated by others, who are also not thinking . . .

1/
Political psychologists like @karen_stenner describe the authoritarian personality.

Those with an authoritarian disposition are averse to complexity. They reject nuance.

They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.”

(link in the next Tweet)

2/
See for example, "Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness,” which originally appeared in this book, an dwhich Stenner has now made available free on her website, here: ……e-4700-aaa9-743a55a9437a.filesusr.com/ugd/02ff25_370…

Timothy Snyder also talks about the danger of what he calls Internet Memes.

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(