Cailin O'Connor Profile picture
Sep 10, 2019 6 tweets 1 min read Read on X
The #metascience2019 meeting got me thinking about reproducibility in modeling. From now on, in collaborative modeling projects, I'm going to have two individuals reproduce the same results separately. A thread.
Shirley Wang had trouble reproducing results from big data sets trying to reimplement the code others developed.
In my own work, I've caught little errors last minute, and once had an error in a published paper. I've caught many errors in student code.
It's easy to make a mistake in even relatively simple simulations, much less more complicated ones. In addition, there are often small misunderstandings in the team about how details are being implemented in an algorithm.
To sum, benefits 1) fewer errors, more confidence in results, 2) more clarity within the working group about exactly what is being modeled and so 3) hopefully clearer communication about exactly what the model is.
And so I've spent all of today reimplementing the simulation in a paper my students did this last year.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cailin O'Connor

Cailin O'Connor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cailinmeister

Sep 14, 2023
Social beliefs, including those about gender, race, sexual orientation, fatness, and disability, impact science. Here’s a 🧵 of examples I find interesting and wanted to share. Feel free to add! I’m going to keep growing it over time.
The Lover's of Modena - two skeletons buried holding hands in ~5th CE - were long assumed to be a male and female. More recently it was determined they were two males. 1 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lovers_of…
They were quite literally *seen* as a heterosexual couple because of our beliefs about gender and sexual orientation. Once the sexes were revealed folks tried to reinterpret the meaning of their hand holding - like, maybe they were soldiers who died together in battle? 2
Read 15 tweets
May 10, 2023
Out at last!! Do moral judgments impact COVID risk judgments? We find people think infection risk is lower when doing morally good things. online.ucpress.edu/collabra/artic…
With interdisciplinary team @weatherall_jim @daniel_relihan @AshleyJ_Thomas Kyle Stanford and Pete Ditto 2
Subjects read vignettes where COVID risk was kept fixed (Joe rode on an elevator with 5 strangers), but motivations and intentions varied (Joe wanted to help an aging neighbor/Joe wanted to buy cocaine) 3
Read 5 tweets
Oct 27, 2022
"I was so wrong", a 🧵. @KevinZollman argued that less connected groups of scientists might be more successful than more connected ones. They preserve a diversity of practices longer b/c they communicate less (and thus avoid herding onto a bad theory). 1 link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Co-authors and I critiqued this "Zollman effect" by arguing that it only shows up in a small portion of parameter space in his models. We argue that it thus likely doesn't apply in lots of cases, but that disconnection carries other harms. 2

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Since then I've become convinced that the general phenomena is pervasive, robust, and very important. Across many models with different assumptions, some way of preserving a diversity of beliefs is crucial to epistemic success. 3
Read 10 tweets
May 8, 2021
New Paper! We find that subjects think you are less at risk of COVID infection when engaged in morally good actions, and more likely to catch COVID while doing morally bad things. In other words, risk judgments are systematically skewed.

osf.io/preprints/meta…
We present subjects with vignettes where the exposure is always identical, but the reasons for the exposure vary. I.e., Joe always gets caught in an elevator with neighbors, but might be headed out to buy drugs, or to help an elderly friend. 2
In two experiments we find risk is judged higher when moral valence of the action is judged lower. We got interested bc of infographics worried about fun outdoor activities like going to the beach or the pool, but not about drs/grocery stores. 3
texmed.org/TexasMedicineD…
Read 7 tweets
Sep 24, 2020
Threats to the ACA make me feel almost physically ill. Many non-Americans, or even wealthier citizens, don't know anything about living without health insurance. It is awful, even when you are young, healthy, and otherwise privileged.
1
I grew up middle class, but after college didn't get the kind of job that provides health insurance. Who can afford to pay for it our of pocket? This began a four year period of mostly not having insurance.
2
Once I needed to see a Dr. and called a clinic to ask what the price would be. They flat out refused to answer. "Depends what the doctor orders!" In the end I talked to a Dr. for about 25 minutes, with no other treatment. They charged $300 - a whole week's wages. 3
Read 8 tweets
Sep 14, 2020
Kino Zhao is finishing her dissertation this year in LPS. Let's have a little thread about her and her work. Here's Kino: Image
Her dissertation in the philosophy of social science is totally exciting. She looks carefully at the details of practice in different fields to think about successful methodology.
Her strong grasp on statistical and other formal methods allows her to think about how these methods are used, how they justify certain inferences etc. I would describe much of her work as using this lens to investigate claims in feminist philosophy of science.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(