The president of Harvard apologized for "suggest[ing]...that just as the 13th Amendment banned the ownership of African-Americans, Harvard’s individual schools could no longer “own” their specific wealthy graduates."
And he went for the classic "I'm sorry if you're feelings got hurt" apology, favored by people who apologize under duress. Why not just go for, "I'm sorry I said something offensive?"
If that's not enough for you, keep in mind that he said that as he was talking about *future* fundraising for Harvard, which last year closed a capital campaign that raised $9.6 BILLION. They paid $0 in taxes on that money. thecrimson.com/article/2018/9…
With that kind of wealth, you'd think Harvard could at least match UCLA or, heck, Amherst on the % of low-income, Pell Grant recipients it enrolls. Pell goes to students from households with less than $60K income, or just about the income of HALF of US households.
The most heavily weighted single factor in the Best Colleges rankings is Undergraduate Academic Reputation, which USN calls "Expert Opinion."
Here's the thing: there is absolutely no way the presidents, provosts, and deans of admissions they send the survey to can be qualified to answer the questions, let alone claim expertise.
Let's talk about some dumb stuff people say about test optional admissions. 🧵
This might take a sec, so here's the tl;dr:
TO policies, in and of themselves, are neither a cure-all for what's wrong with American higher ed nor the end of what's good about it, but the evidence points to their doing some good and no harm.
Let's define TO first.
A test-optional policy is one that allows applicants to decide whether they want their test score to be considered. It does not "get rid of tests" or "ban tests."
Almost every 4-yr college in the US is currently test optional.
For decades, colleges, med schools, and law schools have all made the point that standardized tests exist to show readiness to succeed in college or grad school.
Rankings were one of the incentives to focus on scores well beyond the readiness threshold and overemphasize tests. That emphasis has excluded lots of people who were highly qualified to become lawyers and doctors.
While we're waiting for fall IPEDS data, I got curious about how segregated expensive private high schools are relative to public schools. 🧵
I used the 2019–20 Private School Universe Survey to identify schools that belong to the National Association of Independent Schools and go through twelfth grade. I got public school data from the Dept of Ed in each location. nces.ed.gov/surveys/pss/pr…
I looked at just a few states. Here's my home state. I thought it looked bad, until I looked at...