Loyalty & Pride over Military Service for a Commander in Chief (Thread):

1. Pussy hats didn't work
-RussiaGate didn't work
-Stormy & Jean Carroll didn't work
-UkraineGate won't work
-Corrupt media has lost nearly all of their influence

So what is the left trying now?
(con'td)
2. I've noticed another method of attack from the left to dissect the loyalty of one of President Trump's most fiercely loyal bases lately, and it's the most laughable. But most Americans don't understand why the military & combat veterans love our Cmdr in Chief so much.
(cont'd)
3. Being a combat vet myself, I wanted to share some insights from my own experience, those of my Brothers and some other friends who are part of "the machine" to help explain a few things, and show why this is yet another losing battle for the left.
(cont'd)
4. Have you ever had a job that you thought you would love, doing something that you were great at & enjoyed, but realized that management or corporate culture tied your hands & hamstrung you from doing what you knew needed to be done?
(cont'd)
5. This is something that happened to our military for 16 yrs under both Obama and Clinton, and I'd like to share a personal story to help explain one of the reasons Obama was such a terrible CoC, and why ISIS proliferated under his control but was decimated under Trump.
(cont'd)
6. My first book, Love Me When I'm Gone, has most of the story set on FOB Shank in Logar Province, Afghanistan. It's a province near the Pakistani border where my ODA spent most of our time on my first deployment to Afghanistan.
(cont'd)
7. Because of its proximity to Pakistan and Kabul, it was a main pipeline for men, weapons & equipment moving from Pakistan to Kabul, and has been on & off a very hot part of Afghanistan throughout the war.
(cont'd)
8. When my ODA went to FOB Shank, we were the first warfighters on the FOB - it was mainly a logistical base before that, with some EOD as the only combat arms present. There was an ANA Kandack base across the street, and we trained, armed and fought alongside them.
(cont'd)
9. Because of its proximity to Pakistan, there were quite a few bad guys in Logar, & we would be frequently rocketed or mortared at night. Before we arrived, the US soldiers couldn't do much about it. After we arrived, we were allowed to hunt the people doing it.
(cont'd)
10. We had an open Rules of Engagement that was clear & straight forward: find, fix & destroy the enemy. Pretty clear when someone is lobbing Katyusha rockets and mortars at you that they're the enemy. So, they sent mortars, we went after them, problem solved.
11. After that deployment was over, I had a little over a month off before heading to Iraq with a different battalion, and while I was in Iraq my former ODA went back to Afghanistan and FOB Shank. There was an Army Times article about my ODA titled "72 Hours in Hell..."
(cont'd)
12. ...written about a 72 hour firefight they were in during that deployment, so you can guess what the OPTEMPO was like for them. I cannot find that article anymore, which is odd.
During that deployment, FOB Shank began a major buildup, getting runways, expanding...
(cont'd)
13. ...in size and even getting a runway large enough to land C-17's on, which is significant. FOB Shank has since been turned over to the Afghans, and this article pretty much sums up what they've done with it: stripes.com/news/welcome-t…
(cont'd)
14. But that's not the important lesson.
After my ODA finished their 2nd deployment to Shank, a friend of mine in Civil Affairs was sent their, overlapping the end of my former ODA's deployment, staying for another year after they left.
What else happened in this time?
(cont'd)
15. Obama took office.
There are many reasons that the military (aside from the politicians masquerading as Generals) hated Obama's treatment of the military, but my friend's experience at Shank under his rule is a great example of one of the major ones.
(cont'd)
16. Obama wanted to rule the military from DC, taking power away from the warfighters on the ground, constraining the Rules of Engagement (ROE) to the point where soldiers were worried about shooting back lest they be brought up on charges for war crimes...
(cont'd)
17. ...which Obama's admin did often. The Taliban & AQ knew this, and began using women & children as human shields, always having cameras present to take video if American soldiers shot back, having a direct line to US press just in case they could use it as PR...
(cont'd)
18. ...with a willing media, who were strangely anti-war then, yet seem to be warmongers now that President Trump is fighting to keep us out of wars in the Middle East.
But one of the major implications of this ROE was that you could not shoot back unless you could...
19. ...positively identify the person who was shooting at you. By virtue of their use, this is nearly impossible with mortars and katyusha rockets, which are made to be able to put distance between you and the target, and were often shot at FOB Shank during the night.
(cont'd)
20. The chilling effects Obama's ROE had on commanders was to be extremely hesitant to allow their soldiers to do their job and hunt, fight or even shoot back at bad guys who were shooting at them.
During my Civil Affairs friend's deployment, they essentially had to...
(cont'd)
21. ...lay in their bunks at night, knowing they would be mortared and rocketed, and knowing that they couldn't do anything about it.
And, of course, when the Taliban figured out they could do this with impunity, the attacks picked up significantly.
(cont'd)
22. Just imagine that, for a moment: sent to a God awful place for a year, ostensibly to fight for your country, but having your hands tied keeping you from not only fighting but also from defending yourself.
And people wonder why PTSD increased so much during that time.
(cont'd)
23. Not surprising to anyone with a competent brain, these constrained ROE also allowed ISIS to flourish. Commander's hands were tied to the point where ISIS was allowed to take massive amounts of land, slaves, kidnapping victims and operate with impunity.
(cont'd)
24. At a time where Obama acolytes had total control over military operations. It's almost like he didn't want anything done to stop them.
A friend of mine was tasked by the New York Times to look into how and why President Trump was able to decimate ISIS in 2 years...
(cont'd)
25. ...when Obama couldn't do it during his 8. My friend is a NYT best selling author who has more contacts in JSOC, C_A and F_I than most, and so he did what a good author or investigator does...he reached out to his contacts.
(cont'd)
26. They told him the same thing that any war fighter who served under Obama could have told you: when President Trump removed Obama's constraining ROE, the warfighters were finally allowed to actually go hunt bad guys.
(cont'd)
Having run multiple successful businesses, President Trump knew that ego serves its purpose, but when you are not the Subject Matter Expert, it's best to defer to the SMEs when making big decisions.
(cont'd)
27. He gave military control back to the military, got rid of the politicians masquerading as Generals and tasked them to destroy ISIS - and that's exactly what they did, in record time.
My friend wrote an article and submitted it to the NYT, but they refused to print,
(cont'd)
28. saying that it "would make Trump look good."
Think about that for a moment: the NYT refused to print anything good about President Trump, even when he had successfully decimated the virus that is ISIS.
Enemy of the people, indeed.
(cont'd)
29. I've seen a resurgence in the left attacking President Trump for his lack of military service, but they are, as usual, completely missing the point and not understanding why the military and combat veterans love his as their Commander in Chief.
(cont'd)
30. Full disclosure, I've considered many times re-joining the military just to say that I could have served under him.
I'm nearly 40, have 4 kids and am doing the thing that makes me happy (writing), but the honor of having him as CoC has made me think about it.
(cont'd)
31. These lunatics on the left that attack President Trump's service never worry that Bill Clinton not only never served, but also decimated the military with his Base Realignment and Closing (BRAC), reductions in pay and funding.
(cont'd)
32. They don't care that Obama used cheap Chinese steel to build military equipment, reduced our supply of ammo to the point that Gen Mattis warned Trump during the transition that we were combat ineffective, and sent pink slips to combat arms Captains while they...
(cont'd)
33....were on deployments. The last one essentially took our combat-hardened leaders out of the professional advancement, ensuring we'd lose an entire generation of military leaders with combat experience.
Think about the implications of that.
(cont'd)
34. He's only been in office for 3 years, and already President Trump has done more for the military and veterans than any President before him with military service.
"But the VA Choice bill has been on the table for decades."
-but it never got passed before him
(cont'd)
35. "But they've been talking about reforming the VA for decades before Trump."
-but they never actually did before him.
He's turned our military back into a professional fighting force, the likes of which the world has never seen.
He's put money back into the...
(cont'd)
36. "Peace through Strength" philosophy, making world leaders second guess every geopolitical gamble they had put into play under Obama.
How many Navy vessels were antagonized by Iran under Obama?
How many under President Trump?
The world understands now, as they did...
(cont'd)
37...under Regan, that if you mess with the USA, you will be turned into a parking lot.
At the same time, he's keeping us out of needless wars, much to the chagrin of talking heads like Meghan McCain, Max Boot & Bill Kristol.
Those who've never had to receive a phone...
(cont'd)
38. ...call telling you that you Brother in arms is dead do not understand the significance of that.
Those of us who've received those calls do.
We are willing to fight and die for the flag & what it represents if needed.
We believe in the USA.
We love the USA.
(cont'd)
39. But we don't want to lose our Brothers & Sisters if not absolutely needed.
We'd prefer to let our enemies die for their cause rather than our countrymen & women.
But the left understands none of this.
(cont'd"
40. So let them continue their "President Bone Spurs" claims and attacks on his credibility as CoC due to a lack of military service.
But also understand that we vets and active duty do not see that as the most important attribute for a CoC of the US Military.
(cont'd)
41. Loyalty, love, respect and a "weapons free" ROE if we're sent to do our duty and hunt bad guys are all that we care about.
President Trump understands that, has done that, and we love him for it.
God bless America, thank you God for President Trump.
/END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Patrick Lewis

Robert Patrick Lewis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RobertPLewis

Feb 21
The Ukraine / Russia boogeyman fear mongering isn't about the billions of dollars that US corrupticrats have parked there for their money laundering schemes, NATO or even a genuine fear of Russian aggression.

It's about tyrannical power...
Think back to all of the government overreach and tyrannical oversteps that come as a result of war footing. The Patriot Act is just one single example - and note that it's all still in place despite our soldiers having been pulled back from Iraq and Afghanistan (mostly)...
The Ukraine / Russia narrative is purely because they need a new reason to clamp down domestically because the Coof reasoning for lockdowns is fading away.

I don't believe Boris Johnson removed all Coof restrictions in the UK because he realized the err of his ways...
Read 7 tweets
Feb 10
Tomorrow is a pretty big day for the market. Either they:

1. Jen Psaki the inflation data and lie through their teeth like they did last week on employment numbers. If this happens, we will see another bull run until rate hikes next month...
2. They tell the truth and it all tanks.

Part of me believes they will try to kick the can down the road until midterms so they can blame it on Republicans.

But with every industry getting hit with massive price increases forcing shortages, higher gas & food prices and -
...fertilizer driving farmers out of business,, its would either take a serious IDGAF communist style attitude of pretending the house isn't on fire, or more resources than I think exist to keep it hidden.

We shall see which they choose tomorrow.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 6
If this is true, why did the Bureau of Labor & Statistics (BLS) have to "seasonally adjust" (see: fake) their report last Friday after warning that the numbers
would be very low?

I have an educates guess, if you want to hear it...
Last week we saw a report that although JPOW stated the Fed was starting to allow assets to run off the balance sheet, that balance sheet has ballooned up to $8.73 trillion.

Some of us also calculated that "an entity" placed over $150 billion in worthless trades last MWF that-
...literally stopped the stock market from crashing.

Now, what entity can afford to buy 1 billion put options in a single sitting that just happens to hit all market indices and reverse their natural course?

If you've researched the Plunge Prevention Team, you may know...
Read 8 tweets
Feb 2
One of the things that makes it so amazing that some people still feel communism is a good idea is the constant "law of unintended consequences" that you see as a result of commies putting people in charge who've never been in charge of any real life function before...
Example:
The genius commies from the Soviet Era of Lenin & Stalin felt central planning was a good idea. And why not? If you want a government to control the means of production, they have to tell people what to produce and how much...
But they forgot to factor in human behavior, especially the capitalistic tendency that is ingrained into every human to get the most out of whatever you do.

The central planners simply gave quotas of goods that needed to be built...
Read 6 tweets
Jan 25
I've got a hard truth for meme stock and retailer traders that you may not want to hear (but need to):
Those who are betting the bank on JPow riding in and saving the day to give Biden and the Dems a chance during the midterms are missing 2 big things..
1. The dems know what they're doing is widely unpopular - they don't GAF. They got away with stealing 1 (actually many but 1 that was so blatant you have to try not to see it).

2. The Fed is not your friend. 'Member when Citadel was losing its shirt to the WallSt Bets crowd-
...but Citadel managed money for many in DC so they got Robinhood to shut down the trades working against Citadel?

These people are smart, but not intelligent. They use the same tricks over & over & over since the media won't hold them to account and social media will censor -
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
There's going to come a time by soon when the communists realize that their takeover via scamdemic didn't work.

They will try to blame it on faulty numbers, bad info, anything but the truth...
But never forget: The initial projections from the Kings College London were exponentially wrong from the get go.

The guy who is responsible for the projections used to justify lockdowns believed his own projections so little that he broke the lockdown he created to meet -
a married woman for a tryst.

Yet the powers that be, the elites, our brave and intellectual "betters" continued using the same shop guilty of projections that were horrendously wrong over and over and over again...
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(