How Trump’s free personal lawyer’s post 9-11 profiteering is a NATIONAL SECURITY CRISIS.
In this video & thread, investigative legal analyst @tracygreen documents Giuliani’s BIG GREASY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
1/ SHREWDY RUDY: Watch the video: it’s a fast seven minutes, and it lays out each hat Giuliani wears—the ones that we know of—and the explosive conflicts of interest.
2/ KOMPROCATIONS: White collar crime expert and veteran trial lawyer @tracygreen asked a very simple question: who’s Giuliani working for... the answer is, well, komprocated.
🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢
3/ THE HAT TRICK: As @tracygreen began tallying the numbers, nine was her initial tally. But since Giuliani doesn’t do disclosures—we’ll get to that—the actual number may be cranked up to 11.
4/ THE OPPORTUNIST: Personally, I was shocked to learn that Giuliani built quite the empire profiteering off the tragedy of 9-11. Who knew🤷♀️
Check out first four hats: 1. Giuliani Security Crisis Mngt 2. Trump freebie 3. Lawyer for foreign & domestic clients 4. Giuliani & Co LLC
5/ LOSS LEADER: Hats five through seven are revealing, as doing free p.r. for his pal Trump is looking like quite the loss leader.
5. High-buck speaker—except free for Trump 6. GOP fundraiser & campaigner (who ran for Pres. and Senate) 7. “Informal” Gov’t Cyber Security Advisor
6/ RUDY CONFIDENTIAL: So let’s examine the year 2006-2007—Giuliani was paid $11 million dollars for speeches.
In the fake email below, we illustrate the stark reality of Giuliani accepting money to give speeches for foreign entities while working for Trump.
That’s problematic.
7/ WONKS WANNA KNOW: Before we reveal more hats, let’s get wonky.
As Trump’s personal attorney, communications are secret. Who pays his Ukraine investigation expenses? Who paid for his indicted gofers expenses? Rudy says “none of your business” but the ethical issues loom large.
8/ GIFT HORSE: @tracygreen says: “To analyze the ethics of Trump accepting Rudy’s gifts, we need answers to basic questions—who are Rudy’s clients, will Rudy deduct the expenses of his gifts to Trump, did they exchange gifts before and what’s the value of free legal svs? A mill?”
9/ GIULIANI & SON: So now that we revealed the komprocations posed by hats 1-7, let’s see what’s behind hat number eight.
Shocked not shocked: nepotism.
8. The “dad” hat: Giuliani’s son the golfer works directly for Trump in the White House.
🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢
10/ F.O.G. HAT: Coming it at No. 9 is the “Friends of Giuliani” hat. If you make the cut, you too coulda received Big Money from Giuliani now-indicted Soviet born gofers.
Just ask Pete Sessions.
11/ RE-CAP: Nine hats, and a whole lotta lack of transparency led @tracygreen to pursue Giuliani’s missing chapeaux.
12/ FARA-WAY: Hats 10 & 11 are murky but what’s under the brim🧢
10. Lobbyist? Does Rudy work for Trump for free to avoid registering as a lobbyist? 11. FARA Agent? He appears to be acting as a lobbyist for foreign nationals, co.’s & govts. So why isn’t he registered under FARA?
13/ FRAUD GUARANTEE: The many, many, many hats of Rudy Giuliani—9 that we know of and possibly 11—reveal profound entanglements, huge conflicts of interest and massive national security risks.
As the Soviet born nationals of Fraud Guarentee will tell you: buying access was easy.
14/ RISKY BUSINESS: The many, many, many, many tentacles of Rudy Giuliani.
15/ PLZ CLICK THE LINK: Before I get to my Q & A with Tracy, do plz chk out the video link so you can folo along with ease.
16/ PASS THE 🎤: An interview with @tracygreen on key takeaways from Giuliani’s many, many, many, many hats.
Q1:
HSC: Lets start with this—peel everything back and it appears we have a man who profits off 9-11.
@tracygreen: 1. “Rudy, like Trump, seems to understand branding.”
17/ Q1 con.
@tracygreen: “He still calls himself America’s Mayor—wants to be addressed as Mr. Mayor.
“It’s one thing to build a private security co.—it’s quite another to become Trump’s personal attorney who works for ‘free’ to show clients and foreign govts access to Trump.”
18/ Q1 Con.
@tracygreen “Giuliani also profited from Trump naming him in January 2017 as informal Cybersecurity Advisor. Right after that, Giuliani began providing security work for Ukrainian cities.”
19/ TAMMANY TRUMP:
Q1 Con.
@tracygreen “The person I blame for this is Trump. Trump values loyalty above all and creates conflicted relationships. Trump doesn’t believe government ethics rules apply to him, his family and friends. He’s Tammany Hall—he doesn’t follow the rules.”
20/ BACK-CHANNEL RUDY:
Q2
HSC: As a lawyer, how bad are the optics on Giuliani’s conflicts.
@tracygreen: “As a lawyer, Rudy has a duty of loyalty to his clients. Even though not paid, he has a duty to Trump. He has an equal duty to Parnas and Fruman.”
21/ Q2 con.
@tracygreen “Is Rudy still representing Parnas and Fruman? If Rudy claims Trump and Pompeo directed him in the Ukraine investigation, was he acting as a lawyer or govt liaison? Does he now have an ethical conflict with Trump?”
22/ Q2 con.
@tracygreen “Now that Rudy learned that Parnas and Fruman used foreign money to make huge political contributions through a shell company what does he do? One of Parnas and Fruman’s defenses may be that Rudy told them what to do—the situation is rife with conflicts.”
23/ UGLY & UNPATRIOTIC:
Q2 con.
@tracygreen “Rudy handled it this way so he could pursue back-channel diplomacy for Trump, help defeat Biden in 2020 & pursue Rudy’s own business interests at the same time.
“It’s UGLY. It’s UNPATRIOTIC. It’s all about money meeting politics.”
24/ Q2 con.
@tracygreen “Trump is selling America to whoever will work for him for free.
“Reminds me of the Cohen arrangement with Trump. Cohen got paid millions by corporate America after the election and never registered as a lobbyist. Trump wasn’t bothered by this at all.”
25/ DOUBLE STANDARD:
Q3
HSC: Women pols are bullied when getting paid for speeches yet Giuliani made $11 million in a year on 9-11 “fame” and no one bats an eye.
@tracygreen “It isn’t just women politicians. It’s politicians.”
26/ Q3 con.
@tracygreen “The speeches by Clinton and her husband were reported because she was Secretary of State and had to do disclosures. She had security clearance..Other politicians have to do disclosures. Both financial and for security clearance.”
27/ Q3 con.
@tracygreen “Rudy is allowed to be a rogue diplomat and investigator lawyer—he makes no financial disclosures. He has no current security clearance. We need to change rules so people cannot operate like this in future. It’s corruption and will breed more corruption.”
28/ Q4:
HSC: Giuliani’s son works for Trump🤷♀️.
@tracygreen “His son has no prior pol experience. It’s all about loyalty. Rudy can tell clients/govts ‘my son works in the White House.’ I wonder how much confidential information Andrew ends up having that can benefit his father.”
29/ Q5:
HSC: “Did Giuliani’s bid for presidency foreshadow how Trump profits off campaign.
@tracygreen “Giuliani used campaign to pay himself rent and legal svs..His firm Bracewell & Giuliani did lots of legal consulting for campaigns as well. It seems Trump absorbed a lot.”
30/ Q6:
HSC: What is a key thing you learned in doing this research? Is Giuliani an unregistered lobbyist.
@tracygreen “Apart from being an opportunist, Rudy is a man of mystery. I learned we have no idea who his clients are so we cannot tell if he is an unregistered lobbyist.”
31/ Q6 con.
@tracygreen “When he gives speeches, that may be lobbying and it depends—consider the roles Giuliani has in the White House with his informal cyber advisor position, his son working there and his ‘personal’ attorney position while Trump is president.”
32/ ECHOES OF MANAFORT:
Q7
HSC: The optics on Ukraine connections are sh*t
@tracygreen “If Americans look at the ethics rules that all govt employees, judges and members of Congress have to follow, we see that Trump and Rudy don’t follow the basic ethics rules that others do.”
33/ Q7 con.
@tracygreen “Why would Rudy facing an expensive divorce give away a million dollar in legal fees to Trump? Only if he can profit from it does it make sense. He borrows $100,000 to pay taxes while he works for free? Get real.
“Didn’t Trump learn from
Manafort?”
34/ Q7 con.
@tracygreen “And now the latest volunteers Parnas and Fruman are indicted.”
(Below, Lev Parnas is Giuliani’s plus one to the funeral of George H. W. Bush cuz that’s not weird.)
35/ NATIONAL INSECURITY:
Q8
HSC: Giuliani is under investigation for Ukraine ties. We know Ukraine is where Russian mob set up shop😳.
@tracygreen “The Ukraine has a lot of gas, and it’s the wild Wild West there. This means opportunities for politically connected Americans.”
36/ SWAMPTOPUS🐙:
@tracygreen “From an ethics perspective, should White House ethics counsel be looking into this? From campaign perspective— FEC—which is already looking at Parnas & Fruman. New York State Bar—conflicts of interests? FARA perspective—should Rudy have filed?”
37/ THE WILD, WILD EAST:
How does former Texas Gov.-Energy Sec. Rick Perry fit into the Ukrainian investigation puzzle?
Perry and Giuliani are two of the “Three Amigos”, taking care of Trump’s Ukraine business this summer along with AMBO Sondland.
In Part 2 of our Speakeasy series with Ukrainian historian Tetiana Boriak, she offered the Bette Dangerous community a detailed history of the Holodomor, Stalin’s man-made famine. Here is that report
Author’s note: With the help of a Ukrainian scholar, I am rewriting the history of what we know about communism. Any romanticized notions go out the window when we view history through the eye of a refugee-historian, with access to key documents that tell a cold and hard story about lies and theft, murder and starvation. We are offering a service to reality that helps us in this grave moment when political starvation proves again convenient to dictators and war criminals who talk of peace, as fascist dictators did a century ago. The following transcript, edited lightly for brevity and clarity, is from our interview with Ukrainian historian Tetiana Boriak on November 23, 2025, about the history of the Holodomor, Stalin’s man-made famine, which took the lives of 3.9 million Ukrainians. While working on a book project on the topic in February of 2022, Boriak realized that ‘Russia was killing us again,’ and she sought refuge in Lithuania for her and her children. She is now an associate professor in the History Department at Vilnius University. This interview took place during the week of the Holodomor Remembrance and is part of our three-part Speakeasy series with her. As you will learn, the Soviets were expert at creating fake realities to fool the West, a tradition that continues today.—hsc
2/
FAMINE AS WEAPON: Exposing Soviet Evil
Words by Tetiana Boriak; edited by Heidi Siegmund Cuda, from Part 2 of our Speakeasy series with the Ukrainian historian on the history of the Holodomor, Stalin’s man-made famine
Begin transcript:
Tetiana Boriak: I will try to make it pretty clear, because it’s not complicated. When you know the consequence of the events, then you can better understand the contemporary situation.
So the starting point is to understand the man-made famine, the Holodomor, is recognized as a genocide by almost 30 countries — the European Union, the European Parliament, the Assembly of the Council of Europe.
To understand, you will have to go back to the First World War, because 1914 - 1918 was the period when the empires collapsed, the Russian Empire, the Austro-Hungarian empire, the Ottoman Empire.
The First World War became a certain social network, because people from various regions of one country met accidentally on the battlefield. And they suddenly discovered that they have similar problems. And when we talk about the Ukrainians on the front of the First World War, they discovered that they have the portrait of Shevchenko, that is the national Ukrainian poet, who wrote about oppression under the Russian Empire — that they basically have the same needs. They just want land. They just want to work on this land and that Petrograd, that is St Petersburg, it’s far away and Moscow is far away. And basically, this is not their war.
So this was the main outcome for Ukraine, together with the collapse of the Russian Empire. Then we had the March 1917 resignation of the last Russian emperor, Nikolai II.
Then we have an attempt of a democratic government, of the temporary government, to create some kind of… Russia of the future, they were trying to implement some democratic changes, but the authoritarian machine seemed to be pretty powerful.
And the second reason that is probably even more important is the Russian propaganda. The Soviet Union started with the Russian propaganda. It was an unprecedented level of propaganda in world history, I would say, because the Bolsheviks, namely Lenin, was pretty smart, he was a criminal, obviously, he put millions to the ground, but he was a pretty smart guy in terms of how to communicate their messages. So the whole army of Russian agitators was created.
They had the printing houses. They printed leaflets. So basically they were saying to the Russian soldiers that this is not their war, as well. And so if the front has collapsed, the Russian sign the agreement with Germany and their allies, they kind of leave the war. But on the other hand, this allowed them to focus on occupation of the territories.
And in Ukraine in 1917, simultaneously, with the resignation of the Russian emperor Nikolai II, the democratic government was created. And so they started to do all these changes that were necessary to set the stage to have negotiations, how to govern, how to communicate with the people, to create an army, to introduce Ukrainian languages, language of communication, etc.
So this Ukrainian revolution lasted from 1917 to 1921 — there were several democratic governments during this period. But the war with Russia began already in December of 1917, right after what is called the Great Bolshevik Socialist Revolution, on November 7, 1917. By December, the Russians launched war on Ukraine.
3/
Donald Trump’s recent threat to the International Criminal Court is a sign that he is in far more trouble than he is willing to admit, I report in @BylineTimes
Donald Trump’s administration this week threatened new US sanctions on the International Criminal Court, in an attempt to strong-arm it into not investigating him and his top officials.
2/
Such a move is an admission of guilt. An innocent man would have no reason to demand that the ICC amend its founding document. Reuters first reported the threat on Thursday.
3/
We Fight As We Breathe—A Q&A with @Mamulashvili_M
A thoughtful conversation with commander of the Georgian National Legion Ukraine on Putin’s attempts to reanimate the corpse of the Soviet Union and why supporting Ukraine is the West’s best play bettedangerous.com/p/we-fight-as-…
Author’s note: On September 23, reporter Adam Sybera and I interviewed Mamuka Mamulashvili, Commander of the Georgian National Legion — Ukraine, at Bette’s Happy Hour. Mamuka has been fighting in Ukraine against the Russia invaders for more than a decade, survived multiple assassination attempts, three poisonings, and 32 years of war. At the age of 14, Mamuka took part in the Georgian-Russian war in Abkhazia. Towards the end of the conflict, he and his father were taken prisoner. Mamuka spent three months in captivity and was later released through a prisoner exchange program.
What follows is a transcript of the interview, lightly edited for clarity and brevity.—hsc
2/
We Fight As We Breathe: A Q&A with Mamuka Mamulashvili
A conversation with the commander of the Georgian National Legion Ukraine on Putin’s attempts to rebuild the corpse of the Soviet Union and why supporting Ukraine is an insurance policy for the rest of the free world
3/
Bette’s Happy Hour on Tuesday with disinformation analysts Dietmar Pichler and Alex Alvarova was one of our finest — the exchange of information from our global community was phenomenal.
2/
I kicked off the event by talking about how I’m framing the world at the moment between those pushing illusion and those living in reality. The illusionists create phantoms — this week’s model is ‘antifa’ — a conjured phantom to defang the word ‘fascist’ so the illusionists can target political enemies.
3/
A historic look at how conspiracies poison democracy, as detailed in Richard J. Evans book, “The Hitler Conspiracies: The Third Reich and the Paranoid Imagination”
It’s okay to admit we got it wrong. We weren’t prepared for the Great Propaganda Wars.
2/
How could we be? We who were raised in democratic nations relied on a shared narrative of truth. We relied on academic and scientific expertise. We put our trust in higher learning, and those who deviated from a fact-based world — the snake oil salesmen, who exploited fear and ignorance — well, there were repercussions for these criminal exploiters. Our fact-based world had punitive laws for the exploiters.
3/
The moment I learned of Charlie Kirk’s death, I thought of Jeff Sharlet. Sharlet has documented extremist right-wing movements in America for two decades, and he was the one who taught me how Ashli Babbitt became a MAGA martyr.
2/
In an interview with RadPod on his book, The Undertow: Scenes from a Slow Civil War, Sharlet told us:
So Ashli Babbitt, 35-year-old white woman from Southern California, Air Force veteran storms the Capitol with violent intentions - she wrote about them. That's her knife on the cover of the book. That's the evidence photo, you can see it dated 1.6.2021.
She climbs up into a window leading a mob through a broken window, they smash the window, she comes up into it.
And we see on the video that very day, the two hands of the Capitol Hill police officer who shoots her, and it is the hands of a black man, and she's a white woman, and as a student of American mythology and American history, I know right away what's going to happen with that story.
And it happened within hours. First, they started saying Ashli - she was 135 pounds, she was in her 20s. Or maybe she was 16, she was just a little white girl. And they start shrinking her - she's 125 pounds, that's not going to work. She's 115 pounds. No, she's 110. They are making her into this model of white innocence.
Now, those not familiar with the history of lynching don't realize that at the heart of lynching throughout American history has been this kind of sexualized panic. This idea that black men are coming for our - possessive, you see - white women - a kind of property.
And that's the story that they began telling.
That's when the book really started to take shape. I said I'm going to follow the formation of this martyr myth.—Jeff Sharlet, on RadPod