The political power of police unions - concentrated in America’s most “progressive” states - has led to the creation of laws and policies that enable police violence and make places like CA and NY less transparent or accountable than the average Republican state.
The political power of police unions must be curtailed, their power to negotiate and determine policies involving police discipline and use of force must be taken away, and their influence in funding and electing candidates and initiatives must be challenged and defeated.
A big reason police unions have so much power is they enjoy bipartisan support. The Right is dismantling every union except police unions and the Left/organized labor won’t challenge any unions - even though police unions present a particular problem that needs to be addressed.
To defeat the police unions, lawmakers in both parties need to show the courage to reject police union influence and begin curtailing their power. This won’t happen unless organized labor is also willing to call out the ways police unions use their power to corrupt the system.
It’s one thing to bargain over wages and benefits. It’s another to give a police union the power to negotiate away any semblance of justice or accountability within your community or state. Lines must be drawn.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here are some facts about no-knock raids from the data that’s available. A thread. (1/x)
First, data on police raids is extremely limited. Nobody knows how many raids there are, no-knock or otherwise. Like other forms of police violence, there’s no national database. Surveys of police suggest 20,000-60,000 raids/year. But the data isn’t public and over a decade old.
From the data on *fatal* police raids we’ve gathered at mappingpoliceviolence.us, at least 106 civilians have been killed in police raids executing search warrants from 2013-22. At least 31 were no-knock raids. That’s an undercount - police don’t always disclose details publicly.
We just issued a Cease and Desist letter to #CampaignZero over their attempt to plagiarize our Mapping Police Violence platform. They have until next Weds to stop masquerading as Mapping Police Violence and misappropriating our work & site as their own. Here are the facts. (1/x)
I began building the Mapping Police Violence project in 2014, before I met @deray and before Campaign Zero existed. The first time he found out about my project was in this email on February 4, 2015.
Note that We The Protesters (which later became Campaign Zero) first became an organization after filing for incorporation on June 29, 2015. And Campaign Zero didn’t exist until August 21, 2015. There was no actual CZ/WTP organization when MPV was created and launched.
There are more than 2,400 elected prosecutors in America. Keith Ellison is *1 of only 4 prosecutors* who has prosecuted and convicted officers in two separate incidents where police killed someone in the past 9 years.
The 4 prosecutors who’ve convicted officers in two separate police killings are Keith Ellison (MN), Faith Johnson (Dallas), Paul Howard (Atlanta), Steve Kunzweiler (Tulsa). 3 of them are Black despite fewer than 5% of all prosecutors being Black. 2 were elected out of office.
🚨After @Nettaaaaaaaa and I called for accountability for #CampaignZero, @deray is trying to forcibly take over the Mapping Police Violence database that I and my team have built for *years* - redirecting it to a COPY he has no capacity to maintain in an act of retaliation. 🚨
Before I even met Deray and before Campaign Zero existed, I began building Mapping Police Violence to give communities data to fight back against police violence. It has since become among the most cited resources in the space. The real site is still here: mappingpoliceviolence.squarespace.com
I never thought his animosity over my leaving CZ would cause him to retaliate like this. The fact that we’ve been working on this database for months *unpaid* while he keeps fundraising $40M+ on our work - and on the movement - is shameful. AND on the first day of BHM!
The simplest explanation for this is that the high-profile murder of civilians by police traumatizes and destabilizes communities, which leads to increases in crime. Police violence periodically generates crime in communities.
This has nothing to do with police “pulling back.” It has to do with police aggression leading to catastrophic results for communities. Population-wide effects of police violence on community health, particularly in Black communities, are well-documented: news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/…
What’s particularly pernicious about the “scholarship” on this issue is that a group of criminologists is advancing a theory that police are *not being aggressive enough* after murdering someone that that causes crime to increase. The exact wrong conclusion to draw from the data.