Shiv Sena's petition in Supreme Court is a no-holds-barred attack on BJP.
It states that Sena had been associated with BJP in Maharashtra for last 30 years but owing to certain fundamental political differences during last few weeks, that association has come to a staggering end
It states that Shiv Sena has been in advanced talks for government formation with the NCP and Indian National Congress. It is for evolving a common minimum programme that three days' time was sought from the Governor which was disallowed.
Sena alleges that the action of Governor in rejecting 3 days' time is part of the well-concerted plan of BJP to invoke Article 356
Any imposition of President's rule would result in horse-trading by BJP and allow it to "somehow cobble up majority by using unconstitutional means"
Governor is duty-bound to allow reasonable time to political parties to conclude their negotiations on government formation and he/ she should not act as an agent/ mouthpiece of the Central government, Shiv Sena contends.
The action of denying time to Shiv Sena is ex-facie arbitrary and contrary to Article 14, Sena has contended.
It has, therefore, sought quashing of Governor's decision of November 11 and also prayed for a direction to be issued to Governor to grant Sena reasonable time to demonstrate that it has requisite support to form government in Maharashtra.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Hearing in Shiv Sena petition unlikely to happen today; Supreme Court Registry has informed Shiv Sena lawyers that it will not be possible to constitute a Bench today and has asked them to mention the matter tomorrow morning at 10.30 AM. @barandbench
#MaharashtraPolitics: Since CJI Ranjan Gogoi, who is to demit office in few days, has decided that all mentioning should happen before Justice SA Bobde, the matter is likely to be mentioned in court 2 before Justice Bobde.
#MaharashtraGovtFormation: The decision regarding when to file the second petition challenging imposition of President's rule in Maharashtra is also likely to be taken tomorrow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the most depressing stories to come out of court in recent times.
Man killed by police on ground that he was dacoit. Media also publishes the photo of the deceased as dacoit. Policemen involved are rewarded for the killing. But….(1/n)
The real dacoit found to be very much alive and in jail. The mother of the deceased man moves High Court for CBI probe. Police admit in court that the dacoit is alive but single-judge of HC still declines CBI probe. Hands over case to Police itself to probe fake encounter (2/n).
Mother moves Division Bench in appeal. Meanwhile, Police file closure report in the fake encounter but the investigating officer does not even find time to appear before the trial court after closure report is filed. (3/n)
Sudarshan News and media regulation: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.
Centre has filed a fresh affidavit calling for regulation of digital media before the court takes up issue of regulation of TV channels.
Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi is appearing on behalf News Broadcasters Federation which has sought impleadment in the matter.
Rohatgi says NBF is the largest body of tv channels in India with 160 members from different parts of the country.
He submits News Broadcasters Association is not representative of news channels and seeks permission to file an affidavit to put forth a self-regulatory mechanism.
Hearing against Sudarshan News commences before the Supreme Court.
Sanjay Hegde enters appearance on behalf of Zakaf Foundation of India.
"I have a watching brief in this matter. We are not a party to this matter," says Hegde.
Justice DY Chandrachud tells Hegde that Sudarshan News has raised substantial issues against Zakaf Foundation.
"But we are not here to investigate into your client. But Sudarshan News has sought to justify their programme on the grounds of your source of funding"
Sudarshan News and UPSC Jihad: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.
Sr. Counsel Anoop Chaudhuri appearing for petitioner says Sudarshan news has filed an affidavit with vague allegations and submits he wants to file a rejoinder.
Shyam Divan says it was difficult to file a detailed affidavit in two days. We (lawyers) are all in different locations.
We were ambushed by various applications/ interventions, he submits.
Sudarshan News files affidavit before Supreme court defending its programme Bindas Bol and the use of the term "UPSC Jehad".
The affidavit largely focuses on foreign funding received by Zakat Foundation, an orgnisation which supports civil service aspirants.
Sudarshan News has claimed that some such funds received by Zakat Foundation are from terror-linked organisations.
The organisations/ individuals named in the affidavit are Madina Trust, Muslim Aid (UK), Zakat Foundation of America and Zakir Naik
The affidavit says the TV channel has no ill-will against any particular community or individual and do not oppose selection of any meritorious candidate
"There is no statement or message in the four episodes broadcast thatmembers of a particular community should not join UPSC"