Murali Krishnan Profile picture
Nov 12, 2019 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Shiv Sena's petition in Supreme Court is a no-holds-barred attack on BJP.

It states that Sena had been associated with BJP in Maharashtra for last 30 years but owing to certain fundamental political differences during last few weeks, that association has come to a staggering end
It states that Shiv Sena has been in advanced talks for government formation with the NCP and Indian National Congress. It is for evolving a common minimum programme that three days' time was sought from the Governor which was disallowed.
Sena alleges that the action of Governor in rejecting 3 days' time is part of the well-concerted plan of BJP to invoke Article 356

Any imposition of President's rule would result in horse-trading by BJP and allow it to "somehow cobble up majority by using unconstitutional means"
Governor is duty-bound to allow reasonable time to political parties to conclude their negotiations on government formation and he/ she should not act as an agent/ mouthpiece of the Central government, Shiv Sena contends.
The action of denying time to Shiv Sena is ex-facie arbitrary and contrary to Article 14, Sena has contended.
It has, therefore, sought quashing of Governor's decision of November 11 and also prayed for a direction to be issued to Governor to grant Sena reasonable time to demonstrate that it has requisite support to form government in Maharashtra.
Read full story here. barandbench.com/maharashtra-go…
#MaharashtraPolitics: Hearing in Shiv Sena petition unlikely to happen today; Supreme Court Registry has informed Shiv Sena lawyers that it will not be possible to constitute a Bench today and has asked them to mention the matter tomorrow morning at 10.30 AM. @barandbench
#MaharashtraPolitics: Since CJI Ranjan Gogoi, who is to demit office in few days, has decided that all mentioning should happen before Justice SA Bobde, the matter is likely to be mentioned in court 2 before Justice Bobde.
#MaharashtraGovtFormation: The decision regarding when to file the second petition challenging imposition of President's rule in Maharashtra is also likely to be taken tomorrow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Murali Krishnan

Murali Krishnan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @legaljournalist

Jul 25
One of the most depressing stories to come out of court in recent times.

Man killed by police on ground that he was dacoit. Media also publishes the photo of the deceased as dacoit. Policemen involved are rewarded for the killing. But….(1/n)
The real dacoit found to be very much alive and in jail. The mother of the deceased man moves High Court for CBI probe. Police admit in court that the dacoit is alive but single-judge of HC still declines CBI probe. Hands over case to Police itself to probe fake encounter (2/n).
Mother moves Division Bench in appeal. Meanwhile, Police file closure report in the fake encounter but the investigating officer does not even find time to appear before the trial court after closure report is filed. (3/n)
Read 6 tweets
May 17, 2021
A late night sitting by Kolkata High Court to cancel interim bail granted to two sitting State ministers, one MLA and one former Mayor.
Calcutta* High Court not Kolkata. The chartered High Court legacy.
More interesting news. This was not an appeal against the lower court order but a plea for transfer of trial under Section 407 CrPC.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 21, 2020
Sudarshan News and media regulation: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.

Centre has filed a fresh affidavit calling for regulation of digital media before the court takes up issue of regulation of TV channels.
Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi is appearing on behalf News Broadcasters Federation which has sought impleadment in the matter.
Rohatgi says NBF is the largest body of tv channels in India with 160 members from different parts of the country.

He submits News Broadcasters Association is not representative of news channels and seeks permission to file an affidavit to put forth a self-regulatory mechanism.
Read 18 tweets
Sep 18, 2020
Hearing against Sudarshan News commences before the Supreme Court.
Sanjay Hegde enters appearance on behalf of Zakaf Foundation of India.

"I have a watching brief in this matter. We are not a party to this matter," says Hegde.
Justice DY Chandrachud tells Hegde that Sudarshan News has raised substantial issues against Zakaf Foundation.

"But we are not here to investigate into your client. But Sudarshan News has sought to justify their programme on the grounds of your source of funding"
Read 42 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News and UPSC Jihad: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.
Sr. Counsel Anoop Chaudhuri appearing for petitioner says Sudarshan news has filed an affidavit with vague allegations and submits he wants to file a rejoinder.
Shyam Divan says it was difficult to file a detailed affidavit in two days. We (lawyers) are all in different locations.
We were ambushed by various applications/ interventions, he submits.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News files affidavit before Supreme court defending its programme Bindas Bol and the use of the term "UPSC Jehad".

The affidavit largely focuses on foreign funding received by Zakat Foundation, an orgnisation which supports civil service aspirants.
Sudarshan News has claimed that some such funds received by Zakat Foundation are from terror-linked organisations.

The organisations/ individuals named in the affidavit are Madina Trust, Muslim Aid (UK), Zakat Foundation of America and Zakir Naik
The affidavit says the TV channel has no ill-will against any particular community or individual and do not oppose selection of any meritorious candidate

"There is no statement or message in the four episodes broadcast thatmembers of a particular community should not join UPSC"
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(