So they've come out and said that the cladding was categorically not the same as Grenfell.
That's the great thing about words though. It probably isn't the same. I can buy a pack of chocolate bourbons from Tesco, and a pack of chocolate bourbons from Aldi, and I can assure you my toddler will insist they are not the fucking same.
But they are same aren't they? In reality, it's still chocolately biscuit heaven. It tastes the same. It looks the same. If I set it on fire, it burns the fucking same.
The same I'm sure will be true of the cladding. Maybe it's from a different factory. Maybe it is made of slightly different components. I'm sure if you take a sample & put it through mass spectrometry, then results will prove it is categorically not Grenfell cladding.
But it still went up like a lit match. It still spread faster than was reasonable, and if the building had been higher than six stories, if it had been 3am, and if it wasn't populated by essentially able bodied, young students, we'd be looking at a death count.
It's 2019. We shouldn't be looking at fires that spread across a top floor within 20 minutes. We have the materials, the fire safety knowledge and the architectural know-how to make sure this sort of thing doesn't happen.
What we seemingly lack is the ability to put human life and human safety above cheap profit for landlords.
Thanks for listening, vote progressively.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@Hermesparcels Hi, I've heard that there has been a nationwide system glitch affecting the routing of every parcel. Please can you confirm this? We have sent over 100 parcels in the last few days and the vast majority are showing as delayed.
One customer in Wales received the order for a customer in Plymouth, with the Plymouth label attached.
I'm not sure why you aren't responding on here or making any customers aware of your routing issue over the weekend, but just to let you know your "solution" has made the situation worse and you are now putting the wrong replacement labels on items.
@BorisJohnson@Conservatives
What is your official stance on the paper: "Assessing the impact of rising child poverty on the unprecedented rise in infant mortality in England, 2000–2017: time trend analysis ".
"Infant mortality had been falling for all groups of local authorities since 2000, with greater decreases in the most income-deprived areas, reducing inequalities. From 2013, this trend changed, & infant mortality increased particularly in the most income-deprived local auths"
"Since 2013, infant mortality has increased in England & there have been an additional 570 infant deaths over 4 years (2014–2017) compared with what would have been expected based on recent historical trends. Excess deaths have largely occurred in the most disadvantaged areas"
There are a multitude of reasons not to vote #ConservativeParty, but here's another one for you. It's long been known that Tory #austerity has been responsible for the deaths of disabled people, but they have now been implicated in the deaths of infants too.
Three Universities have conducted a study that shows welfare cuts have led to rising poverty, and rising poverty has led to around 570 more infant deaths than would be expected.
" In the most deprived local authorities, the previously declining trend in infant mortality reversed and mortality rose, leading to an additional 24 infant deaths per 100 000 live births per year (95% CI 6 to 42), relative to the previous trend"