Dear @ThomasWinzen and David Weyrauch, in yr @giganetr paper on the @ietf you use the HQs of participants affiliations as an indicator for their nationality. By doing so you're more likely to measure consolidation in the #IETF than anything else.

giga-net.org/2019symposiumP…
#giganet Image
Many people work for several organizations during their tenure in the #IETF. So their corporate affiliation changes, whereas their nationality does not.

A more reliable indicators would have been the nationalities that are indicated by the authors of Internet Drafts and RFCs.
Especially since arguably all people in leadership positions will have authored at least one Internet Draft.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ᗪᖇ. ᑎIEᒪᔕ ✊🏽🖤🎱♠️

ᗪᖇ. ᑎIEᒪᔕ ✊🏽🖤🎱♠️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nielstenoever

Feb 17, 2022
Last days I have been researching the European draft law on artificial intelligence. I am not an expert on AI, but I do know a thing or two about standards, and standard-setting features prominently in this act!
What the European Commission proposes is that standards will be created for AI by European Standards Organisations. AI implementations that are compliant with the standards are legal in the EU.
There are only three European Standards Organisations, namely CEN, CENELEC, and ETSI. AI standards-setting would probably take place within CEN/CENELEC's Joint Technical Committee (JTC) 21 ‘Artificial Intelligence’.
Read 15 tweets
Feb 17, 2022
Procrastination is a capitalist frame we should overcome.

Just write when it works. Increasing productivity is not the solution to our problems.
We need to produce less and consume less.

We are destroying ourselves and our planet just to live up to a market logic that no one fully comprehends.
Also, stop comparing yourself to others. It simply does not help anyone.

Life is not a competition. If we need anything, it is more collaboration, compassion, and solidarity.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 29, 2020
Happy to announce my dissertation is available online:

Wired Norms - Inscription, resistance, and subversion in the governance of the Internet infrastructure

dare.uva.nl/search?identif…
In this work, I examine the role of norms in the governance of the Internet infrastructure.

Based on extensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of different Internet governance bodies, namely @ICANN, @ietf, and @ripencc, I developed a theory.
Norms only get introduced and maintained in the governance of the Internet infrastructure if they:
1) Are translated to the social worlds of the significantly represented groups
2) Increase voluntary interconnection and interoperation between independents networks.
Read 19 tweets
Aug 27, 2020
Another new draft in response to the discussion of the removal of racist language in the IETF.

This new draft practically says: when there is contention about whether a concept is racist or not, the IETF should err on the side of racism and the status quo. Image
The draft asserts that this would be to the benefit of the Internet community.

It also continues to state that removing racist language might be too much work, and would not really contribute much. It's more important to not disrupt the current ways of working. Image
Also, the draft says that no one should be forced to remove racists language because, again, it would disrupt normal work.

When @MalloryKnodel and I started this work, we thought removing racist language would be kind of a no-brainer.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 4, 2020
Am not sure why one needs a souvereignty politics to develop a European normative technological system.

Influential normative systems are aimed a norm setting and dissemination, not isolation.
I think a European normative technical system should seek to leverage the human right to science and with that overcome the patents and copyrights of the infrastructure of the information society.
This would leverage the knowledge production of universities, and re-involve public research institutions with the development of the Internet as public utility.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 22, 2020
Most relevant and interesting changes in the Internet infrastructure happen outside of Internet governance and standards bodies.

Internet governance institutions facilitate interconnection and interoperation between transnational corporations, norm contestation happens outside.
Otoh, Internet governance institutions are a locuspoint for issues. They are the watering holes for a huge distributed infrastructure.

Because of the consensus model, existing interests in the current ordering, and backward compatibility, there is a significant amount of stasis.
I think that governance bodies should engage with value contestation, but this is not in the primary interests of transnational corporations.

Since corporations are structurally the most significantly represented group in every governance body, this change is unlikely to happen
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(