Stephen Miller is a white nationalist. Breitbart promotes white nationalism.
Breitbart's comment section is a reflection of their content — an angry, hate-filled echo chamber. It's for-profit outrage propaganda.
How is this a "trusted source", @facebook?
Breitbart's comment section is a reflection of their content — an angry, hate-filled echo chamber. It's for-profit outrage propaganda.
How is this a "trusted source", @facebook?
https://twitter.com/michaelehayden/status/1198981945516023808
The @hatewatch article points to Miller's lack of interest for domestic terror when the perpetrator is white.
When Breitbart wrote about a white nationalists foiled plot to commit a mass shooting, users in the comment section viewed him as a hero.
When Breitbart wrote about a white nationalists foiled plot to commit a mass shooting, users in the comment section viewed him as a hero.
When Breitbart wrote about the mosque shootings in Christchurch, NZ, the comment section celebratedthe murder of Muslims.
Miller communicated with Breitbart for their reach and because their audience would help promote a white nationalist ideology.
Propaganda =/= news.
Miller communicated with Breitbart for their reach and because their audience would help promote a white nationalist ideology.
Propaganda =/= news.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
