How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
This was the search query used:
https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/1656494348417089538The conspiracy theorist convinced the author that the his Daily Beast colleague, Will Sommer, was an agent of disinformation and shouldn't be able to review the piece. The author agreed.

https://twitter.com/nandoodles/status/1516447245155057664?s=20&t=nH86WfXjAl6mMaKoKFJdKgFirst, the basics. According to their LinkedIn and website, Atlas5 is an advertising company that uses AI to help publishers advertise.
https://twitter.com/conspirator0/status/1413273456356044808Here are the images. Elon Musk did not tweet any of these. Each of the 7 fake screenshots encourages users to google specific types of watches, they're apparently so great that you'd be thanking the fake Elon tweets "later".
https://twitter.com/conspirator0/status/1385403180025008136I know that I sound like a broken record, but we need to be educated on how to identify AI images en masse BEFORE the tech advances to the point of indistinction.
My focus was on the @disqus comment section. Disqus has a TOS for users and publishers called the "Basic Rules". First rule: "Hate speech and other forms of targeted and systematic harassment of people have no place on Disqus". Let's see how this goes. 2/
https://twitter.com/donie/status/1230538783671640064
It's not the first time that a person has been harassed on twitter dot com and I'm sure it won't be the last.
The comments in this thread were taken from the first 1/4 of the article's comments. I grabbed about 100 before needing to step away. It's disheartening and alarming to see an entire community drift toward violent extremism without seemingly any accountability. 
There were a few categories that dominated the comment thread. Twenty percent of the 500 comments collected expressed some form of joy or happiness over the results of the mass shooting where 51 people were murdered. 2/ 
The article seen here was published yesterday (10/31) and it looks to have been an effective dog-whistle. In total, I documented nearly 100 comments from this article that would be classified as "targeted harassment" or "threatening content" according to @disqus TOS.
https://twitter.com/EJGibney/status/956264109351325696
The article was actually a second try on the subject. A few hours earlier, Breitbart published a much more conservative headline and photo. Not entirely surprising that the article was revamped to reflect a clear dog-whistle and encourage engagement. 2/ 