For all those denying any #BBCBias on @BBCNews & @BBCPolitics shows, here's some of the formal 'corrections & clarifications' to "mistakes" made by the @BBC in 2019, which all *completely coincidentally* helped the Tories by damaging @UKLabour's reputation.
The audience laughing at Boris Johnson during the @bbcquestiontime Leaders Debate about his response to a question about 'trust' was *accidentally* edited out.
When Boris Johnson completely messed up Remembrance day by setting off to early then laying a wreath upside-down, the @BBC *accidentally* showed footage from the previous year.
Also, Fiona Bruce on @bbcquestiontime saying Vote Leave did NOT break the law - when they DID.
The @BBC *accidentally* massively inflating allegations of antisemitism within @UKLabour.
The @BBC *accidentally* amplifying a tweet from a fake Tom Watson @twitter account, *accidentally* misrepresenting @UKLabour MP's views on Brexit and *accidentally* misquoting criticism of Labour's New Green Deal proposals.
The @BBC *accidentally* failing to correct a guest's assertion that a @UKLabour MP was facing deselection when she wasn't.
The @BBC *accidentally* claiming a union official was being readmitted to @UKLabour when she'd never left.
When @HackneyAbbott said @UKLabour were level pegging in the polls on @bbcquestiontime, Fiona Bruce *accidentally* said Labour were definitely behind - when Labour were level pegging.
When criticising @UKLabour's 'Race & Faith' manifesto, the @BBC's Victoria Derbyshire *accidentally* said there was NO mention of Islam, when it made explicit mentions of both Muslims and Islamophobia.
@UKLabour @BBC On the relentless & disproportionate attention @BBCNews & @BBCPolitics gives to @UKLabour & antisemitism compared to other parties:
An article considering some of the structural & institutional factors that constrain the @BBC’s journalism, suggesting that its intimate relationship with elite power has long undermined its ability to act as a reliable & independent check on power.
Here's a selection of other peer-reviewed articles addressing other aspects of the institutional & structural bias of @BBCNews & @BBCPolitics, including its worryingly disproportionate use of right wing newspapers & right wing think tanks who often refuse to reveal their funders.
Also extremely concerning is the fact that there are numerous senior & high profile known right wing presenters & editors on (combined with the complete absence of ANY known left wing presenters or editors on ANY) national @BBCNews or @BBCPolitics shows.
#BBCBias
In June 2019, more than half of all guests who appeared on the @BBCPolitics flagship political shows were Tories:
Tories 50.17%
Labour 14.03%
LibDems 2.85%
Brexit 2.46%
SNP 1.75%
Why has our @BBC faciltated a hard-right takeover of Britain?
As @BBC Director General Tony Hall has done just this week, back in 2017, right after an election in which clear @BBCBias was again observable, BBC chair David Clementi called for an end to 'abuse' of BBC journalists.
@BBC Chairman Clementi spent 22 years at investment bank Kleinwort Benson, was chairman of Prudential & Virgin Money, ex-Deputy Gov of Bank of England, advised Thatcher on the privatisation of BT & encouraged her to press ahead with the privatisation of more than 50 companies.
Reported hate crimes in England & Wales have doubled since 2013, to 103,379 during 2018/19:
76% race-related
14,491 sexual orientation
8,256 disabled people
3,530 Muslims
1,326 Jews.
So why has @BBCNews ignored most hate crimes & focussed relentlessly on just one type?
And here Peter Oborne offers his own account of the @BBC's right wing bias. He suggests it always tends to support the Govt of the day - but what we're witnessing now is unprecedented, sinister & catastrophic for Britain's most vulnerable, & our democracy. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Another example of what's wrong with @BBCNews/@BBCPolitics was when @bbclaurak - having been told by two senior (undisclosed) 'Tory sources' - uncritically reported the lie that Matt Hancock's assistant had been punched by a bussed-in @UKLabour supporter.
'Imagine Corbyn had hid in a fridge, expelled former ministers or angrily snatched a phone because it showed a picture of a sick child left on a hospital floor, or @UKLabour had doctored films - @BBC would cancel shows for a "Corbynastrophe" special.'
"Two days before the election, the first five minutes of the @BBCNews was about a @UKLabour MP saying in a secretly recorded phone call he didn’t think Labour could win. So a historically crucial period in history was reduced to office tittle-tattle."
@mrmarksteel
Here's a few recent questions from the increasingly farcical @bbcquestiontime, which out of the tens of thousands who apply to be in the audience, mysteriously manages to attract an endless supply of known Tory & right wing activists, many of whom make multiple appearances...
Despite @BBC guidance on applying to be on @bbcquestiontime suggesting audience members don't apply more than once in 10 years, well known Tory canvasser Ryan Jacobsz, who accused Corbyn of antisemitism in the #bbcqt Leaders Debate, has been on #bbcqt asking questions four times.
In June, Chomsky pointed out that despite Bernie Sanders being by far the most popular political figure in the USA, "you hardly see a mention of him anywhere" on National US broadcast news, & "the @BBC is the same": Sanders is almost invisible hete too.
@BBC A special mention goes to @Emmabarnett for 'Most Ridiculous/Revealing Question From A @BBC Journalist', when she asked @AngelaRayner during a @bbcquestiontime election special whether @UKLabour would “nationalise sausages” if they won the election.
@BBC @Emmabarnett @AngelaRayner @bbcquestiontime @UKLabour Here's another possibly Freudian/unconscious mistake from @BBC political correspondent Alex Forsyth: “They (Tories) have done a relentless focus on Boris Johnson’s promise to take the UK out of the EU if he wins the majority *that he so deserves*.”
@BBC @Emmabarnett @AngelaRayner @bbcquestiontime @UKLabour The relationship between journalist's beliefs & news decisions is strongest in systems where partisanship is an acknowledged component of news coverage, but it impacts on news decisions in ALL news arenas, even those bound by law or tradition to a policy of political neutrality.
@BBC @Emmabarnett @AngelaRayner @bbcquestiontime @UKLabour Finally, I want to make something crystal clear. Britain NEEDS the @BBC. It’s an amazing institution, with some brilliant people & it makes a fantastic contribution to our society, culture, & country. It helps to bring & hold the country together - especially in times of crisis.
The @BBC’s mission is "to act in the public interest, serving all audiences through the provision of impartial, high-quality & distinctive output & services which inform, educate & entertain", & these foundational principles are honourable, & as needed today as ever before.
The @BBC has five public purposes:
1 To support learning for people of all ages
2 To show the most creative, highest quality & distinctive output & services
3 To reflect the United Kingdom, its culture & values to the world...
4 To reflect, represent & serve the diverse communities of all the UK’s nations & regions &, in doing so, support the creative economy across the UK
It's last public purpose is, arguably, its most important &, given the most right wing govt in UK history, currently most needed:
"To provide impartial news & information to help people understand & engage with the world around them".
Sadly, as this thread, & the known political allegiance of the overwhelming majority @BBCNews & @BBCPolitics presenters & editors shows, it is failing in this purpose.
To help save the @BBC, I implore ALL @BBCNews & @BBCPolitics staff & supporters to undertake a period of self-reflection & critical, rational, evidence-based analysis of its recent output, in order to make it truly impartial.
Because without the @BBC, we’d all be much worse off.
@BBC @BBCNews @BBCPolitics PS
Public access link to the excellent: “Public Service” & the Journalism Crisis: Is the BBC the Answer?
It argues that the @BBC's "intimate relationship with elite power has long undermined its ability to act as a reliable & independent check on power." researchgate.net/publication/32…
And ex-Goldman Sachs banker Richard Sharp, who gave the Tories over £400,000, is now @BBC Chair, & the new Director General Tim Davie stood as a Tory councillor & was deputy chair of the Hammersmith & Fulham Conservative party!
Can't wait for Paul Dacre to become @Ofcom Chief!
BONUS QUOTE:
Given the new @BBC Chair gave the Tories £400,000, & the new Director General used to be a regional Tory Party Deputy Chair, & Paul Dacre is Boris Johnson's favourite to be @Ofcom Chief & BBC regulator:
A few anti-Left corrections & clarifications I missed:
In relation to @UKLabour's tax plans, *accidentally* saying the wealthiest 1% in the UK 'carry about 27% of the tax base', when this refers to just income tax - about 75% of Govt money generated by tax are from other taxes.
Political Editor Laura Kuenssberg *accidentally* totally misrepresenting Rebecca Long-Bailey in a tweet which made RLB look like a total idiot, & the @BBC doubling down by kindly explaining that Kuenssberg didn't mean to give the impression that she gave.
*Accidentally* allowing a contributor to make a completely misleading Culture War-fueling claim about Britain abolishing slavery 50 years before the USA did, *coincidentally* during a debate about the Last Night of the Proms.
*Accidentally* fueling Culture War anti-migrant sentiment by stating that under EU law refugees are required to claim asylum in the first safe country they arrive in. They are asylum seekers until they get refugee status, & there's no such legal requirement for them to do so.
*Accidentally stating “there are former Labour ministers and former Labour Prime Ministers who are on the phone, texting their successors all the time on behalf of companies that they have an interest in."
*Accidentally* editing an interview to make it seem as though an interviewee was claiming that “every day” people in the Labour party told her “Hitler was right, Hitler did not go far enough”, which is NOT what the interviewee said.
*Accidentally* falsely claiming that Jeremy Corbyn was not being allowed to stand as a Labour candidate in the next GE “because he refused to accept a highly critical report by the Equality & Human Rights Commission on antisemitism within Labour during his leadership.”
*Accidentally* failing to challenge Nadine Dorries' unhinged, misleading, & unevidenced rant about Sue Gray & Keir Starmer being 'personal friends', & Sue Gray being 'politically motivated' when writing her report into #Partygate last year.
*Accidentally* reinforcing the Big Lie about Jeremy Corbyn’s “refusal to offer up any kind of apology” for any antisemitism in Labour, & *accidentally* questioning whether he would refuse to apologise “as he has all the way up to now”.
(Corbyn apologised on numerous occasions).
*Accidentally* claiming a Labour Council “lost hundreds of millions by investing in solar farms which saw very poor returns”, when NONE of its solar investments have ever lost money and continue to perform well.
*Accidentally* claiming there had been “several demonstrations across Britain during which people voiced their backing for Hamas” despite very little evidence of any significant support for Hamas during these demonstrations.
*Accidentally* saying Bethlehem is “in the West Bank in Israel” when it's in the Israeli-occupied West Bank of the State of Palestine.
*Accidentally* saying Andy McDonald had been suspended by Labour for ‘an alleged antisemitic remark’.
Andy was suspended for saying ‘We will not rest until we have justice. Until all people, Israelis & Palestinians, between the river & the sea, can live in peaceful liberty.’
*Accidentally* saying the union Unite was being investigated for fraud, bribery and money laundering, when it was an individual who worked for Unite who is being investigated on these allegations.
The @BBC apologises for correctly referring to the far-right Reform Party as far-right. Reform uses rhetoric indistinguishable from the far-right BNP & National Front. Reform's co-Deputy leader recently said we should let people crossing the Channel drown.
Chase Herro, co-founder of Trump’s main crypto venture, World Liberty Financial, on crypto:
“You can literally sell shit in a can, wrapped in piss, covered in human skin, for a billion dollars if the story’s right, because people will buy it.”
Despite crypto being bullshit, & memecoins being consciously bullshit, many – especially angry young gullible men – still invest: 42% of men & 17% of women aged 18-29 have invested in, traded or used crypto (2024 Pew Research), compared to only 11% of men & 5% of women over 50.
“It’s no accident that memecoins are such a phenomenon among young people who have grown immensely frustrated with a financial system that, I think it’s fair to say, has failed them” - Sander Lutz, the first crypto-focused White House correspondent.
🧵In January, Farage said Musk was justified in calling Starmer complicit in failures to prosecute grooming gangs: “In 2008 Keir Starmer had just been appointed as DPP & there was a case brought before them of alleged mass rape of young girls that did not lead to a prosecution.”
The allegation that Starmer was complicit in failures to prosecute grooming gangs is often repeated. But how true is it?
Two Facebook posts, originally appearing in April/May 2020, claimed Starmer told police when he was working for the CPS not to pursue cases against Muslim men accused of rape due to fears it would stir up anti-Islamic sentiment.
In 2022 the posts and allegations saw a resurgence online with hundreds of new shares. They said: “From 2004 onwards the director of public prosecutions told the police not to prosecute Muslim rape gangs to prevent ‘Islamophobia’.
Decades of research shows that parroting or appeasing the far-right simply legitimises their framing, and further normalises illiberal exclusionary discourse and politics.
Starmer's speech is more evidence that the far-right has been mainstreamed.
Cas Mudde, a Dutch political scientist who focuses on political extremism and populism in Europe and the US, is, imho, one of the most important voices on the Left today.
Allow me to briefly summarise some of his work.
In a 2023 lecture, Mudde emphasizes the importance of precise terminology in discussing the far-right, distinguishing between extreme right (anti-democracy) and radical right (accepts elections but rejects liberal democratic principles like minority rights and rule of law).
He argues we're in a "fourth wave" of postwar far-right politics, characterized by the mainstreaming & normalization of the far-right - what Linguist Prof Ruth Wodak in a related concept refers to as the 'shameless normalization of far-right discourse'.
After eight years as US President, on Janury 17, 1961, Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower, former supreme commander of the Allied forces in western Europe during WWII, warned us about the the growing "military-industrial complex" (and Trump2.0) in his prescient farewell address.
Before looking at that speech, some context for those unfamiliar with Eisenhower, the 34th US president, serving from 1953 to 1961.
During WWII, he was Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe and achieved the five-star rank as General of the Army.
Eisenhower planned & supervised two consequential WWII military campaigns: Operation Torch in the North Africa campaign in 1942–43 & the 1944 Normandy invasion.
The right-wing of the Republican Party clashed with him more often than the Democrats did during his first term.
In England, 18% of adults aged 16-65 - 6.6 million people - can be described as having "very poor literacy skills" AKA 'functionally illiterate'.
This leaves people vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation, and poses significant challenges for society and democracy.
Being 'functionally illiterate' means that a person can understand short straightforward texts on familiar topics accurately & independently, & obtain information from everyday sources, but reading information from unfamiliar sources or on unfamiliar topics can cause problems.
Adult functional illiteracy—lacking the reading, writing, and comprehension skills needed for everyday tasks—poses significant challenges for a country, society, and democracy.