If you’re on mobile, you won’t be able to fill in any of the templates.
Instead, we recommend opening the Government form on one tab and following this Twitter thread, where we will lay out how to answer each question! (2/21)
Please include information on how this would affect you personally.
Question 1 - Say 'Strongly disagree' and write 'I don’t think trespass should be criminalised at all.'
Question 2 - Say 'Strongly disagree' and write 'I don’t think trespass should be criminalised at all.'
Question 3 – Leave choice blank and write 'I abstain from selecting one of the multiple choice answers to this question as it assumes support for the criminalisation of unauthorised
encampments. I don’t think trespass should be criminalised at all.'
Question 4 – Leave choice blank and write 'I abstain from selecting one of the multiple choice answers to these questions as it assumes support for the criminalisation of unauthorised encampments I don’t think trespass should be criminalised at all.’
Question 5 – Leave blank
Question 6 - Say 'Strongly disagree' and write 'The police already have lots of eviction powers, what we need is more sites.'
Question 7 – Leave blank
Question 8 - Say 'Yes' and leave comment blank
Question 9 - Say 'Yes' and write 'Families should not be sent far away from schools, social networks or healthcare providers.'
Question 10 - Say 'Strongly disagree' and write 'Eviction powers are already too strong. The proposals in this consultation are disproportionate and will have terrible consequences for Gypsies and Travellers.'
Question 11 - Say 'Strongly disagree' and write ‘Eviction powers are already too strong. We should be supporting and protecting marginalised groups – not proposing more powers to use against these communities.'
Question 12 - Say 'Strongly disagree' and write ‘Local authorities already have the power to remove people from the highway. The police don’t also need this power.'
Question 13 - Say 'Strongly disagree' and write 'This breaks basic human rights and decency. Taking people’s homes away will add to the homeless crisis. '
Question 14 - Write 'No.'
Question 15 – Leave choice blank and write 'I did not select a multiple choice answer as it assumes support for the criminalisation of unauthorised encampments. I don’t think criminalising trespass or the amendments to the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act should happen.'
Question 16 - Say 'Highly negative impact' and write 'Being constantly evicted is really hard on families. Do not introduce these changes.' – Add your own experience.
Question 17 - Say 'Highly negative impact' and write ‘This will make it harder for Gypsy and Traveller families to get to school and access healthcare. This will affect health and education outcomes.' – Add your own experience.
Question 18 - Write ‘The Government should make more sites so that people have places to stop.' – Add your own experience.
"On 20 February, we mark the abolition of Roma slavery on the territories of today’s Romania. Much has changed across continents but the enslavement of people in both Romania and the US has converted into new forms of exploitation and control." (3/5)
Previous research by @KatharineQ showed the extent of inadequate site placement, with 79% located within 500 metres of one or more of an A road, motorway, railway line, refuse/recycling, sewage or an industrial estate, canal or river.
🕠We're kicking off our event on 'What does the Policing Bill mean for Gypsy and Traveller communities?' in 5 minutes, chaired by @marykfoy as part of @TWT_NOW.
🔴Treated as 2nd-class citizens;
🔴Chased from pillar-to-post despite having nowhere to stop, thanks to 1994 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act;
🔴Locked into a cycle of trespass, evictions, race hate and discrimination.
🟠Local authority failures on their obligations;
🟠The Caravan Sites Act and the 1994 Criminal Justice and Public Order;
🟠The never-ending cycle of having nowhere to stop and being forced from pillar-to-post, "effectively on a road to nowhere".
WATCH📺: On Tuesday, @mwillersqc of @gardencourtlaw outlined to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill Committee the difficulty that will arise from the Bill's vague definitions and the potential no recourse to justice for Gypsies and Travellers. (1/5)
On the vague terms, @mwillersqc said, "...the problem with Part 4 [of the Bill] and the speculation as to whether or not definitions will become crystallised in litigation is that most Gypsies and Travellers will have left the site and will be unable to challenge... (2/5)
...the decision by a police officer to arrest them, given the scenario that would play out under Section 60c. A Gypsy or Traveller...parking on a piece of land with their family...is not going to hang around when threatened with seizure of their vehicle [read: home]... (3/5)