As I was finishing up my last blog, An Orwelian Lexicon of Bias, which was a blast to work on, what happens?
This guy posts Occam's Screwdriver!
Thread with examples: You are invited: Let's Build a Toolbox!
As it turns out, he has a whole hashtag devoted to it:
#OccamsScrewdriver
For the uninitiated: Occam's Razor is a real scientific/philosophy of science thing. It is the idea that, all else equal**, a simpler model/theory is better than a more complex one.
** sounds easier to meet than it really is.
But why stop at a Razor? Also, why should Occam's Razor be limited to science? That's like not letting Blacks and Jews into your Country Club. Therefore, we need
An Occam Toolbox for Social Justice
Preliminary Entries:
Occam's Sledgehammer: Simply ignoring all possible alternatives to "bias" as explanations for inequality & triumphantly concluding that bias is pervasive.
Occam's megaphone: What you use to proclaim the data vindicate Social Justice narratives, no matter what the data actually say.
Occam's Boomerang: couching your position in so much self righteous fervor that it repels everything in the universe but you.
ht @KisanetBeyene77
@KisanetBeyene77 Occam's Kool-Aid: Hallucinatory visions of otherwise invisible biases, privileges, injustices and grievances. This state of mind is produced by large doses of Critical Theory and Applied Postmodernism.
ht @DrKrahenbuhl
@KisanetBeyene77 @DrKrahenbuhl Occam's Rapid Response Team: Social Justice Outrage Mob ready to dogpile, ostracize, stigmatize and punish anyone seen as violating intersectionality oppression rules. (See #punchingdown).
@KisanetBeyene77 @DrKrahenbuhl Occam's Intersectionality Calculator: Used to determine where you stand in The Oppression Olympics. Determines who's ideas you can debate/disagree with (only with those who are less oppressed than you). This is a real thing (sort of):
@KisanetBeyene77 @DrKrahenbuhl Occam's Word Salad Spinner: Now you, too, can write Postmodern Mumbo Jumbo, with just a little help from this handy tool: elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/
@KisanetBeyene77 @DrKrahenbuhl Occam's Rising Only Boxing Glove: Insures that you only punch up and never engage in #punchingdown.
@KisanetBeyene77 @DrKrahenbuhl And: #OccamsScrewdriver - Even the best intended, most kind and charitable acts can be twisted, exaggerated and weaponized.
@KisanetBeyene77 @DrKrahenbuhl Occam's Ax: Used to: 1. Cut yourself off from anyone who does not completely share your Intersectional Worldview 2. Prepare to eat your own
ht @TheWhig
@KisanetBeyene77 @DrKrahenbuhl @TheWhig Your Turn: What other Tools can we add to Occam's Intersectional Toolbox for Social Justice?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
From a dissertation I advised a couple of years ago. Two national surveys of faculty at top institutions. N's just under 2000, faculty & grads. Left, full breakdown. Right, headline numbers.
Data can be found in this review, though Nate Honeycutt (whose dissertation it is) may also be reporting them in an upcoming publication, currently under review.
New report w/@ncri_io out.
Assassination Culture: How Burning Teslas and Killing Billionaires Became a Meme Aesthetic for Political VIolence.
Short 🧵
Link to full report, which is not that long and should be pretty readable for most people:
Lots of data, but for X, this will do. About half of those on the left in a national survey expressed at least some support for murdering Musk and Trump. networkcontagion.us/wp-content/upl…
Correlation table. Shows support for political violence is psychologically highly structured. Support for one type of violence strongly corrs with support for other violence AND with leftwing authoritarianism (don't tell John Jost, he thinks LWA does not exist).
You are comparing academics to pop-right writers.
A thread of academics on center/center-right/libertarian books that are at least as high quality as left critiques of the right (but beware of rigorous mortis selectivus: No, Virginia, identifying an actual flaw in one of these books does not make it "worse" than the left critiques of the right; that requires a full-on comparison of strengths and weaknesses).
1/n
@MattPolProf Wonderful new book. Debunks nonsense about a slew of progressive cause celebre's (Trayvon Martin, Amy Cooper, etc.) and "science!" nonsense like implicit bias and stereotype threat.
@MattPolProf Excellent book on the rise of authoritarianism on the U.S. left.
In honor of this stupidity, I thread here an incomplete list of the White administrators and faculty at elite U's that have been forced out for: 1. Ethics violations 2. No ethics violation at all.
🧵
Its worth remembering that, whether or not they "defended" firings, they denied that "cancel culture" was a thing and *justified* punishing targets & *implemented* firings, suspensions & retracting papers) with variations of "look how evil that person is."
🧵w/receipts.
First, the firings. When possible, I purposely chose some of the most obvious glorification of the firings. Like here: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
David Shor, fired for Tweeting a peer reviewed sociology article showing that peaceful protests are more effective than violent ones at persuading people. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Dear Aidan,
Please explain how this ad is NOT in violation of U.S. and Washington DC (where APA, the society sponsoring this journal, is housed) laws prohibiting discrimination based on race.
🧵 ending in END.
The ad, shown in full above, includes:
"In service of APA's commitment to EDI... APA Publishing's fellowship program seeks to elevate leadership opportunities for ECP's (early career psychologists) from communities that have been historically underrepresented..." It explains:
"Such individuals include, but are not limited to, psychologists who are Black, Indigenous, or other people of color and ethnicities..."