@GENES_PK 1) BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes code for proteins involved in the repair of double-strand DNA breaks, the damage caused by ionizing radiation, including X-ray. Unfortunately, for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers the NCCN guideline is mammography screening from age 30.
2) This is based on flawed articles suggesting an absence of risk. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16648044
In this article the bias comes from the selection of index cases.
3) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25082516
In this one, the no-mammography group is likely to have mammography after genetic diagnosis, and this results in the comparison of prevalent screening to incident screening.
4) On the contrary, an unbiased study has shown a strong increase in breast cancer incidence after genetic tests were available. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25192939
6) I think you might be able to publicly show the flaws in Narod’s papers and save many women lives. I have been dismissed from my position at the INSERM for having found the risks of mammography.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Il s’agit d’un travail à partir de tous les éléments scientifiques dont on disposait en 2020 sur l’origine du virus du Covid.
1/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ri…
La conclusion en est que l’origine du virus, à partir des éléments scientifiques acquis en 2020 était plus vraisemblablement la conséquence d’un accident de laboratoire que naturelle.
Or l’article n’a pu être publié qu’en 2024. 2/
Cet article incorpore tous les éléments dont on disposait à l’époque. À l’opposé, un article qui n’était basé sur aucun élément et dont les auteurs pensaient le contraire de ce qu’ils écrivaient, était publié dans le prestigieux Nature Médecine en 2020.
3/nature.com/articles/s4159…
People are discovering what I discovered years ago: articles related to Dual-Use Research of Concern need the imprimatur of the US Department of Defense.
That's why there are so many cancers.
🧵 1/
This article
showing that mammograms caused a cancer epidemic in the UK had serial unmotivated refusals before I put it online in bioRxiv.
A few months later, in 2018, I was fired from my permanent tenure at @Inserm (as a civil servant).
2/biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
With @ableyer, we submitted another article to @bmj_latest, with results on the cancer epidemic in the US. There were some criticisms and we were asked to resubmit. We were able to respond to all the criticisms.
However, the corrected paper was rejected by @KamranAbbasi.
3/
As you can see, there has been a strong improvement in treatment, evidenced by a sharp decrease in mortality among men under 50 (lower right panel). At the same time, there is a sharp increase in mortality in old men (lower right panel). 2/
This means that the flatness of the overall mortality curve that has been presented as evidence of overdiagnosis is misleading.
The fact that, among elderly men, mortality does not increase as much as incidence can be explained by improvements in treatment.
3/
Quels sont les risques du nucléaire pour la santé ?
🧵 1/
À l’heure où le nucléaire revient en faveur, il est important de pouvoir évaluer les risques pour la santé humaine. Or aujourd’hui on en est incapable, et la raison en est que la science du domaine relève de l’armée.
2/
C’est en effet l’armée, et en particulier l’armée américaine, qui est à l’origine et qui contrôle ce que nous savons sur l’effet biologique des radiations.
Contrary to what you are being led to believe, the origin of Covid is nothing strange. The activities of epidemic prevention organizations, involving virus collections, were entirely official.
2/
The rapid development of vaccines in the face of an emerging pandemic was one of the stated goals. The Wuhan Institute of Virology specialized in coronaviruses and did not hide it.
3/
L’origine du SIDA.
Je vais essayer ici de faire le point sur l’hypothèse de l’origine du SIDA à partir du vaccin anti-polio oral de Koprowski.
🧵
1/
Il faut commencer par voir INTÉGRALEMENT le documentaire très complet réalisé en 2003 et diffusé sur France 2 en 2004.
Il documente clairement l’utilisation de chimpanzés par l’équipe responsable de la vaccination au Congo.
2/
Une erreur cependant. Bill Hamilton, le scientifique qui enquêtait sur l’origine vaccinale du virus n’est pas mort du paludisme (malaria) mais dans des circonstances non élucidées, liées à l’absorption d’un médicament.