MD, PhD
Mammography-induced cancers
Medical science whistleblower
https://t.co/OrggmGwu0r
https://t.co/pDaq6Oavuc
2 subscribers
La mise en place du programme de dépistage par mammographie aux États-Unis s’est accompagnée d’une augmentation importante de l’incidence du cancer du sein. Rien d’étonnant à cela puisque le but du dépistage est de découvrir des cancers avec des années d’avance.
The implementation of the mammography screening program in the US was accompanied by a significant increase in the incidence of breast cancer. This is not surprising, as the goal of screening is to detect cancers years in advance.
As you can see, there has been a strong improvement in treatment, evidenced by a sharp decrease in mortality among men under 50 (lower right panel). At the same time, there is a sharp increase in mortality in old men (lower right panel).
À l’heure où le nucléaire revient en faveur, il est important de pouvoir évaluer les risques pour la santé humaine. Or aujourd’hui on en est incapable, et la raison en est que la science du domaine relève de l’armée. 
Contrary to what you are being led to believe, the origin of Covid is nothing strange. The activities of epidemic prevention organizations, involving virus collections, were entirely official. 
Les radiations ionisantes produisent des dérivés réactifs de l’oxygène. C’est la principale cause de leurs effets biologiques.
2) The rapid and large implementation of screening in the UK from scratch allowed us to witness this massive increase within 10 years, which cannot be explained by confounding factors whose effects are not as significant in explaining the observations.
It was known that X-rays could cause cancer, but the number of breast cancers that could be attributed to mammograms exceeded at least 100 times the figure expected based on official statistics.
On savait que les rayons X étaient capables de donner des cancers, mais le nombre de cancers du sein qui pouvaient être considérés comme consécutifs aux mammographies excédait d’au moins 100 fois celui qui était attendu par les chiffres officiels.
.@BiosafetyNow members are outraged that @EcoHealthNYC continues to be funded. Personally, I am not surprised. The cessation of funding for EcoHealth Alliance would be an implicit recognition of the possibility of a lab leak.
Although most of the risks of ionizing radiation for humans are linked to radiology (X-rays), it is to the US nuclear industry (under the supervision of the army) that we owe the cover-up of the radiation risks. 
