Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Daniel Corcos Profile picture
Daniel Corcos
@daniel_corcos
MD, PhD Mammography-induced cancers Medical science whistleblower https://t.co/OrggmGwu0r https://t.co/pDaq6Oavuc
3 subscribers
Aug 28 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
Those who blame @NIHDirector_Jay should understand that our common adversaries are in the Pentagon. Their budget is larger than that of the NIH. They will always invoke national security.
But they have an Achilles heel.
Please RT
1/ 1) There is no justification for concealing the risk of X-rays other than to protect themselves.
2) Anyone can verify that mammography screening has been followed by a wave of cancers in older women that cancels out the benefits of screening (Corcos & Bleyer, NEJM, 2020).
2/
Aug 22 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
Dear Peter, as you rightly noted: "Many cancer screening trials randomise participants between invitation/no invitation to screening. The effect of lack of compliance with the allocated intervention is often catastrophic."
1/ Despite these limitations, most mammography screening trials indicate a benefit on breast cancer mortality.
It would be preferable to evaluate mammography screening based on the long-term effect of implementing screening programs on breast cancer mortality.
2/
Feb 12 • 32 tweets • 6 min read
Fil sur mon renvoi de l’@Inserm pour la découverte des cancers causés par les mammographies par Yves Lévy, l’ami de Fauci.
Ce dernier était à la tête de la biodéfense américaine et c'est à lui nous devons la pandémie de Covid qui a fait des millions de morts.
🧵
1/ Tout ce que j’y affirme est vérifiable. Les informations sont soit dans le fil, soit disponibles sur demande.
2/
Dec 6, 2024 • 25 tweets • 5 min read
10-Year Timeline on Discovering Cancers Caused by Mammograms

🧵
1/ 2014
On David Gorski's blog, I learn (belatedly) that mammography screening has not reduced breast cancer mortality. In the comments, I make the hypothesis that this is due to cancers caused by mammography radiation.
2/
Nov 24, 2024 • 22 tweets • 5 min read
Why Cancers Caused by Mammography Pose a Serious Problem for the U.S. Department of Defense.
🧵
1/ After the atomic bombings in Japan in 1945, the U.S. government presented nuclear weapons as conventional bombs of extraordinary power, dismissing reports of radiation sickness as Japanese propaganda.

2/npr.org/2020/08/19/903…
Jun 14, 2024 • 25 tweets • 7 min read
La fraude du surdiagnostic du cancer du sein.
🧵
Ce fil est le plus complet et le plus didactique que j'ai réalisé sur le sujet.
Sa version anglaise à obtenu plus de 2 millions de vues.

Si vous le trouvez utile, merci de RT. Image La mise en place du programme de dépistage par mammographie aux États-Unis s’est accompagnée d’une augmentation importante de l’incidence du cancer du sein. Rien d’étonnant à cela puisque le but du dépistage est de découvrir des cancers avec des années d’avance.
Jun 12, 2024 • 26 tweets • 6 min read
The Fraud of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis
This thread is the most comprehensive and educational I've done on the subject.
If you find it valuable, please RT.

🧵 Image The implementation of the mammography screening program in the US was accompanied by a significant increase in the incidence of breast cancer. This is not surprising, as the goal of screening is to detect cancers years in advance.
Mar 19, 2024 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
Un fil tout public à partir de cet article :

Il s’agit d’un travail à partir de tous les éléments scientifiques dont on disposait en 2020 sur l’origine du virus du Covid.
1/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ri… La conclusion en est que l’origine du virus, à partir des éléments scientifiques acquis en 2020 était plus vraisemblablement la conséquence d’un accident de laboratoire que naturelle.
Or l’article n’a pu être publié qu’en 2024.
2/ Image
Feb 23, 2024 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
People are discovering what I discovered years ago: articles related to Dual-Use Research of Concern need the imprimatur of the US Department of Defense.
That's why there are so many cancers.
🧵
1/ This article
showing that mammograms caused a cancer epidemic in the UK had serial unmotivated refusals before I put it online in bioRxiv.
A few months later, in 2018, I was fired from my permanent tenure at @Inserm (as a civil servant).
2/biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Feb 15, 2024 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
No, melanoma is not overdiagnosed at alarming rates. We have shown that this is false.
Please RT
🧵
1/
Image As you can see, there has been a strong improvement in treatment, evidenced by a sharp decrease in mortality among men under 50 (lower right panel). At the same time, there is a sharp increase in mortality in old men (lower right panel).
2/ Image
Feb 11, 2024 • 23 tweets • 4 min read
Quels sont les risques du nucléaire pour la santé ?
🧵
1/ Image À l’heure où le nucléaire revient en faveur, il est important de pouvoir évaluer les risques pour la santé humaine. Or aujourd’hui on en est incapable, et la raison en est que la science du domaine relève de l’armée.
2/
Dec 29, 2023 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
What have we learned from the origin of Covid?
🧵

1/ Image Contrary to what you are being led to believe, the origin of Covid is nothing strange. The activities of epidemic prevention organizations, involving virus collections, were entirely official.
2/
Dec 17, 2023 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
L’origine du SIDA.
Je vais essayer ici de faire le point sur l’hypothèse de l’origine du SIDA à partir du vaccin anti-polio oral de Koprowski.
🧵
1/ Il faut commencer par voir INTÉGRALEMENT le documentaire très complet réalisé en 2003 et diffusé sur France 2 en 2004.
Il documente clairement l’utilisation de chimpanzés par l’équipe responsable de la vaccination au Congo.

2/
Dec 10, 2023 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
Did you know that the US Department of Defense has funded research on the overdiagnosis of breast cancer?
🧵
1/ You might find it strange that the DoD was concerned about the overdiagnosis of breast cancer, but it was.
2/ Image
Nov 17, 2023 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
Risque des radiations : contre-enquête en quelques dates. #Cancer
🧵
1/ On présente au public les examens radiologiques comme sans danger.
Or, depuis quelques années, le dogme sur l’effet minime des doses faibles de radiation, imposé par l’armée US, a reçu des coups fatals.
2/
Oct 20, 2023 • 13 tweets • 2 min read
🧵 Les mensonges de la radioprotection
Les journalistes qui suivent mon compte peuvent interroger des experts concernant la véracité des informations ci-dessous.
1/ Image Les radiations ionisantes produisent des dérivés réactifs de l’oxygène. C’est la principale cause de leurs effets biologiques.
Ces dérivés réactifs endommagent les macromolécules de l’organisme, telles que les protéines et l’ADN.
2/
Jun 22, 2023 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
Firstly, I would like to emphasize that the association between mammography screening and a significant increase in the incidence of breast cancer is absolute, to the extent that many epidemiologists believed it to be overdiagnosis.
https://t.co/f8soKXTGd2 https://t.co/Bq7pHh6aeYpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26147578/

2) The rapid and large implementation of screening in the UK from scratch allowed us to witness this massive increase within 10 years, which cannot be explained by confounding factors whose effects are not as significant in explaining the observations.
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Jun 17, 2023 • 18 tweets • 4 min read
The Explanation of Cancers Caused by Mammograms: A Scientific and Criminal Investigation.
🧵 Image It was known that X-rays could cause cancer, but the number of breast cancers that could be attributed to mammograms exceeded at least 100 times the figure expected based on official statistics.
Jun 17, 2023 • 19 tweets • 4 min read
L’explication des cancers causés par les mammographies, une enquête scientifique et policière.
🧵 On savait que les rayons X étaient capables de donner des cancers, mais le nombre de cancers du sein qui pouvaient être considérés comme consécutifs aux mammographies excédait d’au moins 100 fois celui qui était attendu par les chiffres officiels.
May 11, 2023 • 15 tweets • 3 min read
What would establishing the truth about the origin of Covid mean? What could be the consequences?
Please RT
🧵 Image .@BiosafetyNow members are outraged that @EcoHealthNYC continues to be funded. Personally, I am not surprised. The cessation of funding for EcoHealth Alliance would be an implicit recognition of the possibility of a lab leak.
Feb 5, 2023 • 18 tweets • 6 min read
Petite chronologie de l'enquête sur l’omerta des radiations. #IRSN #Buzyn
🧵
1/ En 2015, je décide de m’intéresser au fait (c’est prouvé) que le dépistage mammographique n’a pas contribué à diminuer la mortalité par cancer du sein.
2/