Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Kenneth A. Grady Profile picture
@LeanLawStrategy
Jan 23, 2020 • 3 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
@GretaThunberg argues for dropping investments in fossil fuel companies. Indeed, according to GoFossilFree.org, in the past 10 years, over 1,070 institutions in over 30 countries with total assets of around $8.8  trillion have divested themselves ...
of such investments. More than 300 faculty at Harvard have urged the university to divest itself of fossil fuel investments. U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven #Mnuchin responded to Thunberg's advocacy by questioning her economic cred and saying she should stay silent ...
until after she's gone to college. Pretty sure @GretaThunberg is demonstrating that her knowledge of the facts, science, will of the people, and what $8.8T of asset holders believe is far superior to the uneducated views of Trump and Mnuchin.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Kenneth A. Grady

Kenneth A. Grady Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LeanLawStrategy

Kenneth A. Grady Profile picture
Aug 27, 2021
This question comes up all the time in situations where lean thinking is being introduced. The question is not unique to the legal industry. There are several ways to tackle the time issue: ...
1. Accept that you actually do have time to spend on initiatives. You make choices every day how to allocate your time. If process improvement becomes a priority, you will allocate time to it and not to something else. So, the "I don't have time" is really a false choice ...
2. After getting over the initial hurdle, lean thinking helps you free up time. In law, past examples show that easily over 50% of a lawyer's time is wasted. As you use lean thinking to remove waste, that time becomes available to spend on more lean thinking process ...
Read 7 tweets
Kenneth A. Grady Profile picture
Sep 29, 2020
The obvious answer is that may be true. But, at this time we have no evidence that supports that conclusion. To get there, we would need to radically transform our current approach. For example:
1. Winnow out the many issues that are not legal.
2. Leverage tech heavily ...
in a good way (that is, to do those many simple, repetitive things that tech is good at and can be used to reduce work people should not be doing).
3. Aggressively simplify processes throughout the system (reg bodies, courts, agencies) so that resources are not spent on waste...
4. Create incentive systems to de-escalate rather than escalate legal matters.

There are a few, but not all, of the changes that would make A2J far more amenable to a "pay for itself" model.

Finally, there may (probably will) be some residual legal work that still ...
Read 4 tweets
Kenneth A. Grady Profile picture
Sep 26, 2020
Putting together all that I have read so far:
1. Amy Coney Barrett meets/surpasses all of the objective criteria one could reasonably apply to determine whether someone should be on SCOTUS.
2. Her personality-liberals, conservatives, students, colleagues-agree is well-suited ...
to being on SCOTUS.
3. On ideology, I would disagree with her on almost everything (if not everything).

So, in normal circumstances, the Senate faced with her nomination should confirm. Of course, we are not in "normal circumstances". ...
ACB will face guilt by association with Trump, McConnell, and FedSoc. Two of those are an accident of history, the third is by her choice. But, she is fully allowed to associate with FedSoc, so that should not disqualify her.

I cannot see any lawyer given the opportunity ...
Read 6 tweets
Kenneth A. Grady Profile picture
Sep 26, 2020
Imagine you belonged to a party that was not supported by the majority of people in your country. Indeed, the party's leader has said many times that its members wd not get elected to office if they played fair and square. So, you look around at other countries to find ...
parties in similar circumstances. You need a model. A party that can force its views on the majority. To do well in that party, you must show rigid adherence to the party's ideology. You need an organization that will help screen for adherence and a way to award the faithful. ...
You must have mechanisms to punish those who do not toe the party line. Remember, your party and its views are in the minority. You must control the courts and the media to make this work.

There must be a name for such a system. Thinking, thinking ... yes, you will ...
Read 7 tweets
Kenneth A. Grady Profile picture
Sep 25, 2020
Profound-perhaps, uncommon-not in my experience. Unless someone will be in a very subject-specific area at a large company, they will need to acquire a lot of knowledge. For viable candidates, that is a given. But, skill levels are very uneven and require more ...
hands-on teaching.

I'll second @peterdlederer's comment - reading/writing skills rank at the top. Undergrads come to law school with weak skills in these areas (obv. exceptions exist). Law schools don't bring them up to adequate levels (many reasons). Law firms/in-house ...
have similar challenges. Plus, the pressure on billing means law firms are reluctant to spend time on editing/rewrite and time pressure in-house causes the same shortfall. Poor research skills play a role here.

We have evidence that supports this concern. Judges ...
Read 4 tweets
Kenneth A. Grady Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020
A thread that won't do justice to the issue, but here goes (and apologies to ethics scholars for the brevity):
One of the major historical reasons for Rule 5.4 was the "runner" issue. A lawyer would pay a runner to bring him clients. Unseemly (unprofessional). ...
Fast forward decades and the rules has become intertwined with issues such as money transfers between a firm and others (let you mind run free: retirement payments, estate payments, etc.). But the basic notion goes back to professionalism.

The second rule, Rule 2.1, also ...
addresses the concept of professionalism and the idea of independence from others. However, to clarify, a lawyer may consider topics outside of law. But to stay independent, if the client needs professional help in one or more of those areas, they should hire that help ...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(