I think they've gamed it out and except for 3, maybe 5 seats in a tidal wave election, nothing they do can put their seats at risk. They could absolve Trump of ritual infanticide and they'd survive at the polls.
Firstly, there HAS been an avalanche of smoking guns and it's barely moved the polls which stubbornly put support for impeachment and removal at 51%. The national number has to get near 70% to put safe Senate seats anywhere near in play.
That's going to be hard to move the needle that much in the current environment. The kinds of voters who remain up in the air over Trump generally never hear about smoking guns ...
... and psychologically, they twist themselves into pretzels to remain 'fair' and maintain the posture of either the snooty 'sensible center' or the populist 'pox on both their houses'.
So it's going to be next to impossible to get to 55% support for removal in Red States.
And even then, those states don't have strong Democratic infrastructure or a pipeline of solid candidates that could be stood up as competitive threats.
As to the three Senators on the chopping block, they are damned if they do, damned if they don't. A vote to impeach dooms them in a primary, as the GOP base won't accept it. A vote to absolve and endorse dooms them in November.
But if they want post-Senate careers at the trough of white shoe law and lobbying firms, speaking fees, etc –– they need to stay Republicans in good standing. Getting primaried into retirement for heresy sets their parachute on fire.
The other consideration is history. Surely all but the Koolaid Klub understands that they are going down in the history books as villains, or the enablers of possibly the most villainous president in US history.
But if they all stick together, history won't be able to single them out as particular villains worth naming, and they still get to keep their jobs and their parachutes.
McConnell has long ago made his peace with his place in the Great Hall of American Villains and Lindsey Graham has just lost his cotton-pickin' mind.
You'd think one could fall back on getting their real estate license or just live on their federal pension if they could do something of real consequence to defend Constitutional Republicanism as a form of government.
Apparently not.
From the beginning of the Trump presidency, there has always been this feeling that, though the pathway and mechanisms seem impossible, that the whole thing would just collapse under its own weight.
That feeling has never been as palpable as it does at this moment. Alas, the pathway and mechanisms remain impossible.
Our democracy is just that broken.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A (not so) quick personal note on what it means to be pushing back 'elective procedures' to work around COVID outbreaks.
I needed 'elective' surgery last summer which was put off for months as hospitals were taken over by COVID.
I was not going in for a tummy tuck.
I needed open-heart surgery to replace a congenitally defective heart valve that was failing. The only thing 'elective' about it was choosing the date.
The failure of my heart valve had been diagnosed late, so the symptoms were very advanced. The aperture of the valve was shrinking rapidly. I was not getting enough oxygen to my cells and became winded very easily.
This is something I haven't seen adequately discussed for the vaccine-hesitant who are waiting for more info about long-term effects.
The problem is that they are in the wrong paradigm.
They are thinking about vaccines like drugs we take on a long-term basis, where negative effects might take years to manifest. This is why those drug trials go through long-term testing on animals and then long-term human trials.
But that's not how vaccines work. We don't take them on a daily or weekly basis for years. The vaccine doesn't linger or accumulate in our bodies.
In cases where potential vaccines have had negative health effects, those effects have been observed within two months.
Ball first frames Biden's problem as being willing to let some of his agenda be killed by the filibuster. Bernie says that Biden can't snap his fingers and end the filibuster.
Ball then pivots to things Biden CAN do via executive order but hasn't yet (despite the long list of things he has).
It's hard to believe how thirsty my tomatillos and chiles are. I started a kitchen garden in 2018 which helped me understand farming a bit better in little ways. #fafdlstorm 1/8
But nothing compares to the way I've completely internalized the revolutionary nature of the invention of irrigation 600 years or so. 2/8
When it's hot and sunny and hasn't rained in weeks, the trees and shrubs and plants in my neighborhood stay green and plumped with turgor pressure, while my crops require watering every day and sometimes twice a day or they wilt in a matter of hours and die within days. 3/8
"The saying, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it,” suggests that materialism drives us. It’s even harder to get a man to understand something when his community and identity depend on his not understanding it"
It's easy to point the way this is true among Trumpists and Republicans when it comes to COVID, masking, vaccines, Trump's corruption and incompetence, and the authoritarianism of Trumpism.
I'm not a fan of Sinema, but people are dragging her on this when it looks like she might get the $1.2 trillion bipartisan plan into the endzone while asking for some cuts to the $3.5 trillion plan (not torpedoing it).
Most people aren't old enough to remember, but there was a time two or three years ago when big spending bills were denominated in $100s of billions while $trillion infrastructure plans were the stuff of mirages and messaging bills.
I think there is a lot more room for federal spending and I'm really happy that the general consensus has moved in that direction. But it is not surprising to see pushback against sums considered science fiction just a few years back. The full $3.5 trillion was always unlikely.