So, Monday, 1/27, is International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
This year it will mark the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.
This is absolutely a day to remember the non-Jewish victims of the Holocaust in addition to the Jewish ones.
(As opposed to Yom Hashoah, 4/21 this year, which is specifically a Jewish observance to remember the Jewish victims. When it comes around, please respect its specificity.)
So, I have three things I want to talk about:
-non-Jewish victims of the Holocaust
-how much of the Nazis' work was done for them beforehand
-Jewish religious responses to the Holocaust
Non-Jewish victims of the Holocaust, a thread.
Let's start with trans people, and LGBT and gender non-conforming people more generally.
The Nazis set back progress on LGBT rights at least 75 years.
Here's the thing: pre-Nazi Germany was GAY AS FUCK.
Homosexuality was referred to in England as "the German custom," for the French, it was the "vice allemande," and the Italians winkingly called gay people "Berlinese."
1920s and early 1930s Berlin was a gay mecca.
The Germans were researching non-heteronormativity, they were researching sex in general, and they were the worldwide experts in it as far as Japan.
Germany was gay as a picnic basket and loving it.
It's a parallel irony for both Jews and LGBT people that Germany was one of the best places to be gay or Jewish right before it became one of the worst places to be gay or Jewish.
(It's perhaps not even *parallel* -- Jewishness and queerness have long been entangled.)
They were working out vocabulary to describe various marginalized identities around gender and sexual orientation, and consciously creating communities around those identities.
Friedrich Radszuweit, the leader of the Federation for Human Rights, started a magazine called The Third Sex specifically to foster trans community, containing the latest scientific research, autobiographical essays, tips, and both professional and candid reader-supplied photos.
Look at these beautiful people.
Anyway, read more about how amazingly queer Germany was before the Nazis here:
So yeah, the crown jewel of German expertise and supportive interest in queerness was the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft. (Started by a Jewish doctor, so, doubly doomed.)
In 1933, the German Student Union attacked it, and a few days later, its books and archives were burned. The lead administrator, Kurt Hiller (also Jewish, so again, doubly doomed) was sent to a concentration camp.
So, 2 things to note: it wasn't Nazi officials attacking it. It was students. Often in media about the Holocaust, we get shown uniformed Nazi officials or soldiers Doing Terrible Things while other Germans just sort of stand around, maybe jeer at the victims, maybe sell them out.
And the other thing is just:
Take a moment to grieve for all that lost knowledge, all those lost voices in the archives and library, all that lost *culture.*
All the wheels that had to be reinvented by queer communities. All the things that *couldn't* be restored.
And think how much richer our world would be if queer communities had been able to just keep building *on*, rather than *rebuilding*, what the Nazis destroyed.
It seems obvious, as an afterthought, that if you were Black in Nazi Germany you were fucked, but Nazi Germany usually gets portrayed as white (Jewish victims) and even whiter (German perpetrators).
We shouldn't retroactively aid the Nazis in whitewashing Germany.
The history of Black people in Europe goes back a lot farther than the Weimar Republic--Anton Wilhelm Amo, born in Ghana, taught at German universities in the 1700s, for example--but that's a whole other thread.
There was a sizeable population of African descent in Germany prior to the Nazis, primarily a legacy of German colonialism in Africa. They founded a bilingual German-Duala periodical, the Sun of Cameroon, and established German branches of international human rights orgs.
Afro-Germans were prominent musicians and involved in the film industry. (I haven't dug into the history yet, but I guarantee you we lost a lot of art there at the Nazis' hands.)
And, okay, I mean I assume you knew what you're getting into with a thread on the Holocaust, but...
CW: forced sterilization, child abuse, murder, etc.
Approximately 400 children from marriages between Afro-Germans and other Germans were seized from their classrooms and outdoors and forcibly sterilized, often without anesthetic, under Nazi eugenics laws.
Same with disabled children under the Nazi regime. Deaf children were taken from their classrooms by school principals, taken to hospitals where they were sterilized.
And this is before the concentration camps. In a lot of cases, though, we don't *know* what happened to Afro-Germans and disabled Germans.
When communities are small, or not cohesive, stories get lost.
But we do know that the Nazis killed 50,000 disabled people in the "T-4" program, which helped them develop more efficient methods of murder, which would later be used on Jewish and Roma populations in the death camps.
The Nazis saw Jehovah's Witnesses as a threat because they opposed war and urged others not to fight. They imprisoned about 10,000 of them, executed about 250, and a total of about 1200 died in captivity.
They could escape persecution by renouncing their beliefs, unlike Afro-Germans, Roma, Jews, and other groups that were targeted on racial grounds.
Most of them didn't.
Clergy who spoke out against the Nazis were sent to Dachau, where they were confined to special barracks to prevent them from worshipping with or giving solace to other prisoners.
About 2000 were kept prisoner there, and about half died there.
People of Slavic descent, especially the Polish, were classified as Untermenschen, "subhumans." Blonde, blue-eyed Polish children were taken from their families to be raised as Germans, while dark-haired, dark-eyed children were denied education to serve as servants to Germans.
Between 2-3 million Russian prisoners of war were kept in concentration camps and starved to death by the Nazis.
And then there's the Roma. While the Nazis killed a lot of people, as this Al-Jazeera article notes, they applied a "consistent policy of extermination" against three main groups: Jews, Roma, and disabled people.
And let's not forget the first groups targeted by the Nazis, and the first to mount organized resistance--anti-fascists, socialists, and communists. nytimes.com/2000/10/07/art…
The Nazis also started by targeting judges and lawyers, editors and journalists who opposed them.
Those who could use the law to protect people from them, and those who could keep the public informed about what they were doing.
And, of course, young people who fought back, who refused to accept that the future had to be dystopian, who--in a society where the powerful viewed the humanity of their victims as power that must be taken away, and their own humanity is weakness--insisted on humanity for all.
Like it or not, TV and movies are how most Americans learn most of what they know about the Holocaust, and those depictions inevitably show the horrors being committed by uniformed Nazi soldiers.
By the time the concentration camps became death camps--by the time the gas chambers were working--50% of the Jews who would die during the Shoah were already dead.
At the hands of their neighbors.
The book by the authors of the article documents 219 instances of violence by Jews' non-Jewish neighbors after the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, primarily by Ukrainian and Polish communities.
I don't know if the conclusion is supported, but I do know that frequently, it's been when Jews are most assimilated that, ironically, we've been in most danger.
And we keep finding out that the scale of it is larger than we thought. That likely goes for pogroms, too. nytimes.com/2013/03/03/sun…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reading Christian commentary on the parable of the Good Samaritan and 90% of it is "the kohen and the Levite wouldn't help the man because Ritual Purity" and 90% of that includes "so it was a GENTILE who helped!!!" & it's amazing how so many "experts" can be this blatantly wrong.
Seriously, Christians doing commentary on parables, get the words "ritual purity" and "unclean" out of your mouths.
You get it wrong every. single. time.
But I've already talked about that a million times, so instead I want to focus on the whole line of commentary that's "it was a marginalized person/'unclean' enemy/gentile who was the one who helped!"
I read a lot of YA because it’s where some of the more interesting SFF stuff is happening, but that also means I also start reading a lot of stuff that’s not great and boy howdy let’s talk about the normalization of white Christian society in dystopian YA stuff.
Like, if you’ve followed me for any length of time, you’re probably aware of how frustrated I get that a lot of internet atheists seem unable to perceive just how Christian their vision of a secular society is.
But WOW does a lot of YA worldbuilding have the same problem.
And that means that there’s a lot of unacknowledged genocide lurking offstage in these books.
And not acknowledging it feels like a really big *problem.*
The most toxic masculinity--and contempt for their own kids--I've encountered has been among white-collar men.
The contractors who put in my floors brought their children. They had festive music on, they were laughing and talking and so affectionate with the kids.
Like, I came home from the grocery store, and a bunch of the older boys (probably middle school? I can't tell child ages) were hanging out around one of the trucks and they asked if they could help me carry in my groceries.
We walked inside, and there was music and people talking and laughing and kids running around and I remember just being stunned by how *festive* it felt (and in the middle of 2021, it'd been a long time since I'd been to a party)...
no, it's forbidding someone with no ownership rights to the IP from profiting off it--nothing's stopping WOTC from creating a Magic presence in web3 (ew)
Like, look, NFTs are gross and I hope they die a dramatic and ugly death and all these grifters trying to NFT other people's work end up both humiliated and owing the artists they're stealing from a LOT of money
I'm about 75% of the way through the new @MaintenancePod episode on Supersize Me, and it's been making me think of something I'd really like to hear @yrfatfriend and @RottenInDenmark take on: the way the language of addiction is ab/used around eating. maintenancephase.com
Like, if there's one thing you come to understand by listening to a lot of Maintenance Phase, it's that America has a *deeply* unhealthy relationship to food and weight.
And I'm noticing, in the media they talk about, when it's talking about fat people, or to people who want to lose weight, how there's this leitmotiv of "addiction," whether it's implicit or explicit.
Also there’s always this tone Christians take about this shit like Jews saw tax collectors as some sort of unclean aliens living among them and xenophobocally despised them when actually they were angry with them the same way you’d be if a family member started extorting you.
Like Christians REALLY want to associate tax collectors with lepers, as if Jews of the time were less capable than we are of understanding a distinction between quarantining people they believed to have a communicable disease and shunning wealthy, abusive grifters.
Or they want to associate tax collectors with marginalized people today, as if they were equivalent to disabled people or queer people being failed by society, instead of rich people exploiting their own people on behalf of an occupying power.