64 petitions, 3 religions, 9 judges.

Supreme Court set to frame legal issues today in the cases concerning Sabarimala temple entry for women, female gential mutilation, entry of muslim women into mosques, and bar on parsi women - married to non parsi men - in Aghyari. @htTweets
#Sabarimala: Bench assembles, hearing commences.

"We could not agree to the issues framed by everyone. Judges can consider framing the issues in chamber. No need to do it in open court", says Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.
#Sabarimala: Sr. Adv. Fali Nariman questioning the 5-judge bench's decision to refer questions to a larger bench in review petitions.

Can such a thing be done in exercise of review jurisdiction, asks Fali Nariman.
#Sabarimala: The legal issues were answered by bench of 5 by 4 to 1 majority.

A review petition against such a decision is limited in scope, says Nariman.
#Sabarimala: Fali Nariman says law can be settled as and when cases come up before the SC but court cannot be called upon to answer such questions in exercise of review jurisdiction.
#Sabarimala: But there are other cases too and not just Sabarimala, says CJI.

Those cases are related to Sabarimala. The judgment of review bench itself says that, Nariman responds. @htTweets
#Sabarimala: CJI SA Bobde stresses that similar petitions are pending and review petitions have not been decided finally by the judgment (of Nov 2019)

"As per review petition judgment, review petitions have not been decided. It will be decided at a later stage"
#Sabarimala: The review jurisdiction is very limited.

I am not challenging the CJI's prerogative to constitute 9 judge benches to hear cases.

My objection is to the use of review to do that. It will be a bad precedent and will be used again in future, says Fali Nariman.
#Sabarimala: Nariman says the questions referred to larger Bench by the review bench in Nov 2019 were decided by the 5 judge bench in Sabarimala case in 2018
#Sabarimala: CJI Bobde says the maintainability issue raised by Nariman can itself be considered as one of the issues which the 9-judge bench can settle.
#Sabarimala: Sr Adv Kapil Sibal also supports Fali Nariman.

Sr adv. AM Singhvi, however, says 9 judge bench should go ahead and frame issues.

Many of the disagreements will be ironed out during the hearing, says Singhvi.
#Sabarimala: Rajeev Dhavan also throw his weight behind Fali Nariman.

Dhavan submits review cannot be kept pending because other cases on similar issues are pending.
#Sabarimala: "The distinction between Sabarimala and other cases is that Sabarimala is a decided case", Dhavan.

"We (9-judge bench) will not be deciding sabarimala case", says CJI Bobde.
#Sabarimala: "As of now, we are not aborting the hearing", says CJI Bobde.
#Sabarimala: Sr. Counsel Jaideep Gupta calls for harmonious construction of Articles 25 and 26.
#Sabarimala: Everything in the reference order is in the nature of speculation, says Sr. Adv. Shyam Divan.
#Sabarimala: Reference to larger bench is not permissible in review petition

Review can only be used to correct errors in main judgment.

It can't be used to frame issues and refer same to larger bench. That could have been done only during pendency of writ petition, Shyam Divan
#Sabarimala: CJI Bobde reiterates that maintainability of the case before the 9- judge bench itself should be one of the issues which the bench can consider.
#Sabarimala: Shyam Divan says there should be a two-part hearing - on maintainability and merits.

Should not hear the two aspects together, says Divan.
#Sabarimala: K Parasaran says the case being a public interest litigation, the 9-judge bench can look into the matter. @htTweets
#Sabarimala: We will adjourn the case now.

We will frame the issues including issue of whether a review bench can frame questions and refer matter to larger bench, CJI Bobde remarks.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Murali Krishnan

Murali Krishnan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @legaljournalist

May 17, 2021
A late night sitting by Kolkata High Court to cancel interim bail granted to two sitting State ministers, one MLA and one former Mayor.
Calcutta* High Court not Kolkata. The chartered High Court legacy.
More interesting news. This was not an appeal against the lower court order but a plea for transfer of trial under Section 407 CrPC.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 21, 2020
Sudarshan News and media regulation: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.

Centre has filed a fresh affidavit calling for regulation of digital media before the court takes up issue of regulation of TV channels.
Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi is appearing on behalf News Broadcasters Federation which has sought impleadment in the matter.
Rohatgi says NBF is the largest body of tv channels in India with 160 members from different parts of the country.

He submits News Broadcasters Association is not representative of news channels and seeks permission to file an affidavit to put forth a self-regulatory mechanism.
Read 18 tweets
Sep 18, 2020
Hearing against Sudarshan News commences before the Supreme Court.
Sanjay Hegde enters appearance on behalf of Zakaf Foundation of India.

"I have a watching brief in this matter. We are not a party to this matter," says Hegde.
Justice DY Chandrachud tells Hegde that Sudarshan News has raised substantial issues against Zakaf Foundation.

"But we are not here to investigate into your client. But Sudarshan News has sought to justify their programme on the grounds of your source of funding"
Read 42 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News and UPSC Jihad: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.
Sr. Counsel Anoop Chaudhuri appearing for petitioner says Sudarshan news has filed an affidavit with vague allegations and submits he wants to file a rejoinder.
Shyam Divan says it was difficult to file a detailed affidavit in two days. We (lawyers) are all in different locations.
We were ambushed by various applications/ interventions, he submits.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News files affidavit before Supreme court defending its programme Bindas Bol and the use of the term "UPSC Jehad".

The affidavit largely focuses on foreign funding received by Zakat Foundation, an orgnisation which supports civil service aspirants.
Sudarshan News has claimed that some such funds received by Zakat Foundation are from terror-linked organisations.

The organisations/ individuals named in the affidavit are Madina Trust, Muslim Aid (UK), Zakat Foundation of America and Zakir Naik
The affidavit says the TV channel has no ill-will against any particular community or individual and do not oppose selection of any meritorious candidate

"There is no statement or message in the four episodes broadcast thatmembers of a particular community should not join UPSC"
Read 8 tweets
Sep 15, 2020
Supreme Court raises grave concerns about the manner in which debates are conducted by certain television channels.

Justice KM Joseph says many times panellists are not allowed to speak and anchor takes up most of the time and panellists are also half-muted.
Supreme Court berates Sudarshan news.

Here is one anchor who says one particular community is trying to gain access to UPSC. Can anything be more insidious than such claims. Such allegations affect stability of country and also casts aspersions on credibility of exam.
In the UPSC exam, all are subject to same tests, interviews and are assessed by same persons. But the insinuation is one community is trying to infiltrate the UPSC. Can such allegations without factual basis be allowed, asks Justice DY Chandrachud?
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!