My Jewish spouse loves Christmas. Okay, fine, who doesn’t?
Converting to a “Valentine’s tree” seemed a bit excessive.
Came home from a trip tonight. Dear god, how do I make it stop?
Came downstairs and the tree is transformed with whoopee cushions, fake(?) poop, and cockroaches all-over it.
I am stuck in the house with an April Fools Tree and the family members responsible for it.
When my spouse commits, she commits.
Me? I’m starting to have my doubts.
Now she is using the tree as a wedge between me and our almost 11-year old.
For completeness sake, here is the originating tree and her first bastardization of Christmas tree into a tree for every holiday.
Some days are better than others. This is one of those "so this is my life now" days.
I know that there was a time without a tree in my foyer. I cannot remember that time.
Her favorite housemate has a birthday coming up.
Yes, the tree topper is a portrait. Thanks for asking.
Is that a RB Tree?
It just can’t be.
If I were to get onboard with a new official holiday, "Back to school" Day would be the one.
The tree has entered its passive-aggressive phase.
I have always found movies about existential dread of the inevitable to be more terrifying than jump-scares.
I think we all saw this one coming.
Okay, that's a holiday I can get behind.
I can at least take solace that the end is near. I mean it can't go on forever. Right? RIGHT?
After the Thanksgiving tree went up, I let my guard down thinking that there's only one holiday left. I didn't account for the other daughter's birthday.
What in the fresh hell.
This is supposed to be the end. It’s expanding.
Even replication has turned against me in 2020.
My house is 15% tree.
I wake up early. My spouse does not.
I sneak in the dark to protect her sleep.
My spouse set spiny traps that had me hopping in muffled pain every few steps all the way downstairs.
Imagine the extra horror when I discovered what they were.
What did I do to deserve this?
I thank @courtneybrubin for not mentioning anything about tree decorating. However, Bethany's ethos does still come through in her quotes and advice giving me some worry of spontaneous ideation. To those with a family member so "inspired," my apologies.
A fitting finale for 2020, but also for the tree? I dare not get my hopes too high for reclaiming my foyer in 2021.
My current hypothesis is that, for Bethany, the tree represents "normal" and once she perceives that we are back to normal, it will be retired to its regularly scheduled holiday appearances.
Oh no. Are we doing it again?
How do I get out of this loop? I already love her genuinely. Do I have to find a way to love the tree?
She's making it harder and harder to complain about this dang tree.
International Women's Day
With this new trend of featuring people on the tree, I estimate that every person in the world will have appeared after 107 more trees, or is it 10^7?
At what point can we conclude we have hit the nadir of the holiday tree? Celebrating National Napping Day has got to be close.
The Earth Day tree begat those terrifying mini trees and the memory of them assaulting my feet in the dark morning hours many moons (and trees) ago.
The tree now is in its 2nd round of birthday celebrations. And, a hamster has joined the household. I am vaccinated, why is pandemic life still going the wrong direction?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In "Psychology’s Increased Rigor Is Good News. But Is It Only Good News?" Barry Schwartz concludes "My aim here has only been to encourage us to acknowledge that there is a price."
Area of agreement: We must examine the impact of new behaviors to improve rigor because there are almost always unintended consequences that might be counter to the aims of accelerating progress.
Disagreement: "There is an inevitable trade-off between the two types of error...The more stringently we reduce false alarms (false positives), the more vulnerable we are to misses (false negatives)."
This is true only when everything stays the same except the criterion.
Context: You might be tempted to post new content on both platforms until it is clear that Mastodon is going mainstream. This WILL NOT work.
Most user behavior is consuming content, not producing it. Twitter has built-in advantage of inertia and audience.
Posting the same content on both gives no reason for the consumer to go to the new platform, and the barriers to moving and rebuilding one's network are high.
So, producers MUST move consumption to the new platform. How?
I favor an all Green OA world with peer review, typesetting, copyediting, etc as microservices, but I don't see an all Gold OA world as being necessarily as bad as others do. A few reasons and would love to have these challenged by others who are thinking about system change...
In an all Gold OA world, price is evident and meaningful for decisions of authors for where to submit. As such, academic publishing becomes an actual marketplace in which the decision-making consumer is price conscious. Therefore, competition on price increases.
The primary price drivers will be (1) prestige/reputation, and (2) access to relevant audiences. Eventually, (3) quality of service will become influential as well. All three are reasonable cost drivers, even though we hate that the first exists.
The positives: The piece has no invective, no misattribution of claims, and represents other perspectives fairly.
You might counter that is a low bar. For hot topics, I disagree. Also, compare the piece with responses to replication circa 2014-2016. This is real, scholarly work.
Also, I agree with most of the intro in which they value: replication, preregistration, transparency of exploration, and caution when findings differ across outcomes/analyses.
Moreover, the paper is clear when the authors are exploring or speculating.
534 reviewers randomized to review the same paper revealing the low status, high status, or neither author. 65% reject low status, 23% reject high status.
Amazing work by Juergen Huber and colleagues. #prc9
Or, look at it another way. If the reviewers knew only the low status author, just 2% said to accept without revisions. If the reviewers knew only the high status author, almost 21% said to accept without revisions.
I thought it was painful to have 25 reviewers for one of my papers. My condolences to these authors for having to read the comments from 534.
In case it is useful perspective for anyone else, here's part of how I managed the downsides as an ECR so that the upsides dominated my experience in academia.
Key downsides that needed managing for me: (a) dysfunctional culture that rewarded flashy findings over rigor and my core values, (b) extremely competitive job market, and (c) mysterious and seemingly life-defining "tenure"
In my 3rd year (~2000), I almost left grad school. Silicon valley was booming and calling. I was stressed, not sure that I could do the work. And I saw the dysfunctional reward system up close and wanted no part of that.