In the last day or two, I saw photos of the endpapers of Maillard and Martinez-Neal's FRY BREAD, that showed how some libraries have covered names of tribal nations when they put the scanning/cataloging sticker on the endpapers. (1/)
I suppose that problem comes up a lot. What are options some of you have come up with, so that important information on endpapers does not get covered up? (2/2) #Librarians
3. I'll add replies to the thread. To make them fit, I'll need to edit them a bit.
The good news is that there are alternatives to covering up information on endpapers!
4. @ArsLegendi said "It comes up a lot w/artwork, too; a lot of our bks come preprocessed. We’re reordering unprocessed copies; are going to redo in-house putting all of the labels that usually go on the endpapers (esp the huge RFID tag) on inner pages & inside the jacket cover."
5. @ambiguitweets: "In special collections settings generally we either affix such stickers to a flag that's inserted into or attached to the bk, or to a mylar wrapper. Bookplates can also be hinged by the top edge to allow for lifting to read info on endpapers below the plate."
6. @gallbrary said "if there's something we don't want to cover up, we just put the barcode in the same spot on the following page."
7. @oclibraryk said "we attach the jacket + cover to enable reader to lift flap & see the images. We don't place stickers on end papers inside the bks but try to put them in a place that does not obscure biographical and/or content info on the back cover."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) People hold stereotypical (romantic or derogatory) views of Native people. Those with the romantic stereotype think they are "honoring" us with their mascots.
Case in point is the Port Neches-Groves, who are in the news for their performance at Disney World.
There are letters from Native organizations, asking schools to stop. In some states, Native ppl have tried to get state legislatures to pass laws abt mascots.
3) And yet, mascot-love persists. It may be due to the pervasive imagery in beloved children's books that people hold dear and can't let go of.... like these:
1) If you follow me, I assume you want to revisit what you were taught about Native peoples. That includes taking a critical look at ways we're depicted in children's books. It may include rejecting favorites and reaching for ones that actually help your child know who we are!
2) It is terrific when corporations with high visibility (and therefore power) do right by Native and non-Native children. One example: @nickjr. Take a look at this!
Great books that I hope you'll buy and ask for at the library.
3) All the books they recommend are ones I've recommended at American Indians in Children's Literature. If you want more books (at various grade levels) you can start here: …ansinchildrensliterature.blogspot.com/p/best-books.h…
Started to watch Professor Junko Yokota's "Interpretive and Hidden Controversies in Literature for Children." She begins with "Why are there controversies?" Two of 3 items on that slide are about changes (in perceptions and in norms).
Ah! Second slide is about LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE!
Dr. Yokota walks us through sites where controversy takes place: in the words of a book, in the illustration, in the translation (choices a translator makes) of a bk from one language to another... and next slide is about bk creators. Her example is Sherman Alexie and...
1) Are you going to a bookstore today? Take a look at children/young adult bk covers -- of bks by Native writers! pinterest.com/dreesenambe/am…
When you tell someone abt one of the bks, say something like "Louise Erdrich is a citizen of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians."
2) When you use a sentence like that, your use of the word "is" places us in the present, which is good!
Too many ppl don't realize we're still here. As first ppls of this continent, that mistaken idea that we don't exist is especially troubling. We weren't "wiped out."
3) And when you use a sentence that names an author's citizenship (see tweet 1), you are sharing information that tells others that we have governments.
We've got unique cultures specific to our nations but we are nations, first and foremost! That's why there are treaties.