A LONG THREAD ON WHERE IS THE FED? Many investors are expecting Fed (coordinated or not) to do something soon (perhaps before futures open). There has been a lot of debate that CB easing can't resolve health issues, but they can help sentiment. Here's what may happen next.
1/11
Backdrop1: Long gone is the façade the Fed will ignore 👇financial conditions (regardless of driver). Its not much, but the Fed has some flexibility on rate policy side but more importantly can come up w/some creative solutions in its use of the powers granted under 13(3).
2/11
Backdrop2: One of the reasons why the Fed needs to be preemptive is because some of its crisis fighting abilities have been damped post GFC due to Federal Reserve Act section 13(3) revisions per DFA. That said, from what I understand they could still launch ABC facilities.
3/11
Backdrop3: In the early days of GFC the Fed resorted to tweaks versus all out easing measures or launching new facilities. In August 2007 it cut the discount rate and not the FF rate and in Jan-2008 did a 75 bp intra-meeting ease (followed by another 50bp at the meeting).
4/11
Old School Fed: I found this Min-Fed posting (see tinyurl.com/rgyeklr) as a good historical review of potential Fed crisis fighting usage of section 13(3), also see link at the end “Lender of more than last resort” for how the discount window evolved, more later…
5/11
Old Fed playbook1: In the '02 Bernanke report on deflation (see tinyurl.com/qmyto8g) he provides a laundry list of what they can do to stimulate the economy/markets. We have pretty much done all of them except for buying foreign bonds. Meanwhile Fed can buy munis too.
6/11
Old Fed playbook2: Since September 2019 the Fed has been providing liquidity with TOMO repo operations and TRM bill purchases (ie notQE). At a minimum the Fed will be inclined to keep these programs for a while longer (and abort tapering repo) while introducing new tools.
7/11
New Fed playbook1: In my view there is a risk of an intra-mtg ease (as early as today vs allowing mkts to freefall). First off this is a public health concern, but COVID disruptions run the risk of hitting biz CF/working capital. The Fed can encourage discount window use.
8/11
New Fed playbook2: Given JPM & Quarles want to break the DW stigma (see tinyurl.com/qqpbkzx) Fed could announce it reduces the DW rate to 25bp or even 0 over FF (vs 50) for large banks, maybe further for smaller banks if funds are used to help industries hit by COVID
9/11
New Fed playbook3: 17 days is a long time to wait for levered investors, so expect FF rate to come down 50bps too (would make DW rate cut be 75-100bp). The Fed could gauge how these measure work as well as monitor COVID into 3/18 where it could always do more if needed.
10/11
DEFCON1: Its too early to forecast COVID's eco-impact and if there is multiple waves. But Fed is on track to move to DEFCON1 in table (see tinyurl.com/sq65skd) if so they will end up with new ABCs, ZIRP (with tiering) eventual YCC, & credit easing (MBS, CP, & munis).
11/11
BONUS: If Fed does any or all of the above, they could also improve USD funding access and maybe even one day coordinate USD deval (Treasury uses ESF/Fed buys foreign bonds). FX swapline rate levels should come down and f-rrp rate for FCBs should be slashed to have them buy USTs.
So I got it wrong, the Fed decided not to extend the SLR for at least 6 months (as I originally expected).
However they still can make changes as they bought optionality with the attached paragraph (which allows them to revisit this) 1/4
Why would they go down this path? One, its a real-time experiment (they get to see how this change will impact banks or not). Two, they have the bigger RRP mops now and can raise that rate and IOR to help pull up short-term rates (which are in/out of negative levels lately). 2/4
Third, perhaps banks start to lend or at least Fed's encouraging them vs buying USTs. Also, as written in the release, bond market functioning issue stabilized. Banks were loaded w/bonds into CV19 (remember repo crisis), the Fed helped clear the deck with QE (coincidence?) 3/4
There are many forms of technical analysis, I like to combine mean-reversion, tech-signals and unique quant data metrics to triangulate what may be next... 1/4
I turned neutral duration lately and thus missed this last 10bps or so up in rates. Overall been underweight long-ends since late 3q20 for those that have tracked my work on places like @macrohive and @Quillintel but now this is getting way more serious for the US markets. 2/4
👆As per chart above, a number of observations...
1.) Markets, are still run for the most part by humans (or algos programmed by aforementioned), so respect key levels
2.) 1.35%, roughly the old low of the long-term cycle in summer of '16 could serve as a ceiling, or not!
3/4
1A: Rates rise limited by Fed
2A: Rates rise=debt issues
3A: Low rates=buy stocks
4A: Rates rise is a good sign
5A: Overall commodities
6A: Its all about narratives!
7A: All of the above
Survey review: First, thank you for those that participated, got a decent response so I believe the results are credible. With l/t rates on their back-foot and under a ton of pressure lately, the (A) to Q1 is troubling. The majority think the Fed will limit the rise in rates. 2/7
Fed has a communication issue forming and the potential taper tantrum 2.0 risk as well. The idea that rates will stay low forever is the narrative and the Fed has various tools. Meanwhile the Fed also is hoping for sustained higher inflation. It might be leading to confusion. 3/7
Fed dilemma: They're maintain flexibility, hoping the rebound is sustainable & leads to inflation post CV19. The chance of that are higher now given fiscal support. But it will come at a cost by mid-year, unless they up the pace, Fed will be buying less USTs than new supply. 2/5
Inflation Impulse: TIPs have had an amazing run (helped by the Fed) from the depths of the 2020 low. But inflation expectations are still higher on shorter-term tenors, meaning investors are still hedging more for near-term risks of higher inflation not sustainable inflation. 3/5
📝Biz/mkt cycle poll results: Thx again if you participated, we had a decent amount of folks take part. The majority think the US (and probably developed world by extension) is turning Japan-like followed by the latest period is part2 of GFC driven by social/political forces. 1/7
Obviously this was a small set of potential paths (and as discussed we might get a hybrid of these or new outcomes given that we cant predict the future). That said, although I usually sound like that we're destined to repeat the Japan exp, I'm more and more in the GFC2 camp. 2/7
GFC1 resulted in the current environment that we live in, where the financial economy is decoupled from the real economy, where growth is consistently below potential and where central banks play the role in trying to keep it altogether. However this is when change happens. 3/7