How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
Why would they go down this path? One, its a real-time experiment (they get to see how this change will impact banks or not). Two, they have the bigger RRP mops now and can raise that rate and IOR to help pull up short-term rates (which are in/out of negative levels lately). 2/4
https://twitter.com/DiMartinoBooth/status/1347152269192658945?s=20
I turned neutral duration lately and thus missed this last 10bps or so up in rates. Overall been underweight long-ends since late 3q20 for those that have tracked my work on places like @macrohive and @Quillintel but now this is getting way more serious for the US markets. 2/4
https://twitter.com/bondstrategist/status/1361654612307116032Survey review: First, thank you for those that participated, got a decent response so I believe the results are credible. With l/t rates on their back-foot and under a ton of pressure lately, the (A) to Q1 is troubling. The majority think the Fed will limit the rise in rates. 2/7
https://twitter.com/GeorgeGammon/status/1361509657257254915Fed dilemma: They're maintain flexibility, hoping the rebound is sustainable & leads to inflation post CV19. The chance of that are higher now given fiscal support. But it will come at a cost by mid-year, unless they up the pace, Fed will be buying less USTs than new supply. 2/5
https://twitter.com/bondstrategist/status/1302563750415945730Obviously this was a small set of potential paths (and as discussed we might get a hybrid of these or new outcomes given that we cant predict the future). That said, although I usually sound like that we're destined to repeat the Japan exp, I'm more and more in the GFC2 camp. 2/7
https://twitter.com/bondstrategist/status/1189521159857029120DEFCON Update2: Given the need (for fiscal policy) there has to be a well functioning UST market, and so the Fed has stated their mission is to buy USTs at will. But they will need to go beyond just a clean-up operation and allowing leverage to unwind. They need yield caps ASAP.