Rebecca Bull Profile picture
Mar 3, 2020 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Sex and Gender Pay Gap Reporting (GPGR)

GPGR originates from s 78 EqA2020 which talks about the differences in pay between male and female employees Image
The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017 was enacted in April 2017 to kick s78 into gear.

It refers to male and female pay but doesn’t define either.

(Which ought to be unnecessary as S212 EqA provides definitions) Image
The Explanatory Memorandum to the Regs tells us that GPG is a measurement of difference between men and women’s earnings using transparency as a tool to improve policies and practices Image
The Equality Impact Assesment to the Regs focuses on workplace disparities between men and women ImageImage
Why then does Acas in its Guidance to Managing Gender Pay Reporting (Feb 2019) state that self identity should overrule sex? Or even worse, that an employer may omit data relating to employees who do not identify as “either gender” Image
It’s as though ACAS don’t know the law.

I don’t want to rewrite my briefing note so see pages 2-7 in the link here regarding sex and gender reassignment.

murrayblackburnmackenzie.org

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rebecca Bull

Rebecca Bull Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RebeccaMKBull

Jul 18, 2022
A revised version of the Equal Treatment Bench Book is out.

It’s interesting from the perspective of those of us who manifest our belief that sex matters.

judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl…
Disappointing in fact.

This is novel interpretation of Forstater. And in my view it is incorrect.
Forstater offers no precedent whatsoever about the use of pronouns.
Read 7 tweets
May 1, 2022
Mayor Andy Burnham

“For too long, women and girls have had to put up with behaviours in public spaces that have made them feel uncomfortable, frightened or threatened.” manchesterworld.uk/news/the-probl…
In which case I am sure he will understand objections to granting Hooters, a restaurant which styles itself as a venue where sexual objectification of women is the USP

Here are some of the urban dictionary entries for “hooters”
Read 4 tweets
Apr 4, 2022
If your reaction to the new EHRC guidance on single sex guidance is that it should be thrown in the bin.

Then this reveals something of your attitude to women and single sex spaces...
Or if you are CEO of a Women’s Foundation Trust and you decide to follow your friend’s advice to ignore the EHRC’s expert guidance on single sex spaces....

I’d have hoped you would have taken a minute to ask your legal team to undertake due diligence.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 4, 2022
A personal highlight from the new U.K. Equality and Human Rights Commission guidance on single sex services is that it will overturn the original sexist guidance.

Neither sex should be expected to conform to sexist stereotypes in how they present Image
There is no correlation between dress sense and sex.

To make a link between the two, when women are socially pressured into feminine presentation in uncomfortable and often impractical clothing is intensely sexist.
High heels do not a woman make.

No woman’s hair and make up choices should be subjected to scrutiny as to how far they meet sexist stereotypes.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 18, 2021
Sex and gender issues in the workplace might seem difficult to navigate but the Forstater decision has created a useful blueprint.

building.co.uk/sex-gender-and…
1. Prioritising one religion over others can get employees into hot water, the same applies to gender critical beliefs.

All protected beliefs and protected characteristics have to be treated equally.
2. Employees may not believe in gender identity and should not be pressured to state their pronouns, for instance in email signatures. Pressure to do so may be offensive.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 27, 2021
#MayaAppeal

Ben Cooper’s closing submissions in Maya’s appeal against the original Employment Tribunal Judgment (that her beliefs are not worthy of respect in a democratic society) are playing on my mind this evening.

I thought maybe they should play on your mind too...
Ben Cooper QC submitted that no one disputes that gender identity beliefs meet the Grainger criteria for section 10 of the Equality Act

(Translation: those people who believe in gender identity are protected from discrimination)
The effect of the original Employment Tribunal Judgment is that Maya must be required to subordinate her use of language to the opposing view in this important debate (about sex and gender) .
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(