CSUN CoD is a small training org inside a university that funds itself -- ta-da! -- by running a conference.
Understand that this may (already?) be a severe to existential threat to the conference and/or the center.
THREAD
I know it sucks to walk away from a $500+ registration (much less a sponsorship). But the coronavirus is out of their control.
There are also LOTS of attendees who are 50+ and/or have respiratory/immune conditions.
And Disneyland is next door.
It's a bad situation.
Conferences have sunk costs like program guides, websites, rentals, IT support, swag, wifi, etc.
They also usually have a quota of room nights/food & beverage. CSUN will now struggle to meet such a quota.
It doesn't take much to turn this from a small profit to a HUGE loss.
FWIW, I managed Adobe's presence at CSUN for some number of years, and safe to say we are not on each other's Christmas lists.
THAT SAID. They're not Google or Adobe. We canceled bigger-than-CSUN events this week. It'll cost us a lot. We'll be okay. A nonprofit organizer won't.
So. I don't want my registration money (or our sponsorship money) back. They're going to need it. And good luck to them. Seriously. (end)
WAIT ONE MORE THING
This is also true for your local events, church fundraisers, etc. Keep giving even if events can't happen.
I'm about to buy 4 tickets to a salmon dinner that's been canceled, because I know how much of my temple's budget depends on that event.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Okay! Experts! Particularly white and/or male ones! We need to talk.
If someone interviews you on issues of inclusion and bias, where women and particularly women of color have done fundamental work, IT IS ON YOU to center their work. Even if it costs you an Anderson Cooper hit.
You are an expert. Great! Surely you have something relevant to say. But if you don't _explicitly_ point out underinvested colleagues to these producers, then this is what you end up with. White guys talking to white guys about bias, and women of color being sidelined. Again.
What's especially galling in this case is that the research this guy is talking about _cites_ the work of @jovialjoy, @timnitGebru, @rajiinio, and presumably others. They were there first. @jovialjoy was canceled after providing hours of background.
As an animation platform, Flash launched the web into new directions. But once it became a UX platform, without the structure of web or OS apps, it left millions behind. (thread)
Flash launched (as FutureSplash) in 1995 as an animation tool. It was released as a browser plugin in 1996. And people started to make really innovative animations with it right out of the gate.
The problems started when people tried to make entire sites with it.
You see, Flash had no inherent semantics or structure to it. You made shapes, you added keyframes. They moved around. Then they started over.
But text in Flash wasn't text: it was vectors shaped like letters. And that came back to haunt it.
Hi #a11yScotland folx. Thank you for organizing an amazing conference. I'm home in Seattle but want to share some of the links from my talk for you to have a look. (Thread)
Engineers can't solve #a11y problems that are rooted in faulty business or design decisions. They can _make compliant code_ to cover over those decisions. But it won't result in fundamentally better software if it's not conceived with inclusion in mind.
As an engineer, I spent a good chunk of my career trying to make other engineers my allies. But if they're always directed to the most expedient implementation and never recognized for making it accessible, for them it's a fool's errand. They'll burn out, and so will you.
Weird but important corollary here:
Beware the engineering manager who asks business/design questions (e.g., "how many users are we talking about here?").
Why? THAT IS NOT THEIR JOB. They are likely just giving you their excuse in advance for deprioritizing the work.
THREAD: Captions are one of the greatest inclusive design success stories.
The first closed captioning decoder, made in 1980, cost ~$750 in today's dollars. TV not included.
That provided access to 15 hours a week of captioned broadcasts TOTAL across ABC, NBC and PBS.
Today, thanks to US law, every >13" TV sold since 1993 has a decoder. Every TV show broadcast since 2002 has required captions. Those captions now have to carry over to online distribution. And as of 1/1/19, video games require captions, too.
Not a bad 40 years, I'd say.
Captions help D/deaf and hard of hearing people, obviously. But they also help people who don't speak a language fluently, or don't grok a specific accent, or have other issues processing speech, or, like me, focus better when we can read the words.