1/ The emergency aid package announced by the federal government yesterday contains mostly targeted and temporary measures to help affected households and businesses cope with the coronavirus crisis.
I believe these measures are unavoidable and I will not criticize them.
2/ The government has for now at least mostly avoided the typical Keynesian stimulus measures to encourage everyone to borrow and spend more.
Not only are these totally inefficient as a rule, they would be utter folly in the current situation.
3/ We should be under no illusion that this plan will be extremely costly and will make us all poorer in the longer term.
But it may be the price to pay to deal with an exceptional situation and provide a safety net to all those who find themselves in a dire situation.
4/ Trudeau said however that “we have the fiscal room to do this because of prudent decision-making over the past five years.” This is complete BS.
This government massively increased spending and unnecessarily accumulated more debt during its first mandate.
5/ We could easily have been in a surplus situation for years and be much better prepared financially to deal with this situation if the Liberals had really been prudent.
On the contrary, they spent recklessly and Canadians will suffer more because of it.
6/ The situation was also made worse by the Keynesian monetary policies of all major central banks over the past decades.
With their artificially low interest rates, they encouraged households, corporations and governments to borrow imprudently and become overly indebted.
7/ Another financial crash was inevitable even without the coronavirus.
The current monetary system, based on fiat money that banks can create without any limit, is bankrupt.
We will have to return to some kind of gold standard to bring back economic stability.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here is a thread about how an 80-year pattern points to imminent dollar collapse.
History reveals an unforgiving pattern - one that has dismantled every single global reserve currency. Not most. Every. Single. One.
The Portuguese Real dominated regionally (Atlantic and Indian Ocean) for about 80 years, then gradually devalued. The Dutch Guilder reigned for about 80 years, then gradually declined. The British Pound Sterling ruled for about 105 years, then experienced a long decline against the dollar. Each reserve currency was dethroned by the same predictable sequence of seven stages.
The US Dollar was crowned the world's reserve currency in 1944. That was 81 years ago. And right now, in 2025, the dollar is in the final, precarious stages of the very same cycle. We are now witnessing stage 6.
But what exactly is a reserve currency? It's a currency used to set the price of commodities on a global scale. It's the currency in which international trade is conducted. It's the currency that other countries hold in their central bank reserves.
Here is the seven-stage sequence of reserve currency collapse, and the undeniable evidence of where we stand today.
STAGE 1: Military Supremacy.
The Pattern:
A nation emerges as a military power.
The United States in 1945:
Victorious in World War II, the United States stood alone as a global superpower with an unmatched military.
STAGE 2: Reserve Status Confirmed.
The Pattern:
The currency of the country with military superiority becomes the currency that other countries use. In fact, formally or informally, it establishes its currency as the reserve currency.
The United States since 1944:
The Bretton Woods Agreement (July 1944) locked the dollar in as the world's reserve currency, backed by gold. The world ran on U.S. liquidity to support global trade. Since 1971, the dollar has been a purely fiat currency. That is to say, a currency that is not backed by gold and is based solely on trust.
STAGE 3: The Era of Massive Trade Surpluses.
The Pattern:
The nation becomes the world's workshop, running massive trade surpluses as its industrial base booms.
The United States from 1945-1975:
America was the engine of global manufacturing, consistently exporting more than it imported.
I will tweet about the #LeadersDebate in this thread.
Both Carney and Poilievre want counter-tariffs. This means both want tax increases on Canadians!
#LeadersDebate
Poilievre and Carney both agree to force cities to build apartment blocks in nice old neighbourhoods with single homes so that we can house more immigrants.
None of them mentions bringing in fewer immigrants to cool the housing market!
-#LeadersDebate
All the establishment parties support mass immigration despite its catastrophic economic impact
“Canada is continuing to see meagre job growth. But any new jobs are immediately being overwhelmed by immigration numbers that remain at all-time highs.” nationalpost.com/opinion/first-…
2/6
The labour market is swamped with newcomers:
“in just the first eight months of 2023, Canada added 320,000 jobs, but also added 624,000 people looking for jobs.”
3/6
We’re getting poorer because of mass immigration:
“with Canada now absorbing more than one million new people each year, each Canadian’s individual share of the economic pie has continued to shrink.“
Opposition to mass immigration is becoming mainstream!
In 2019, when a PPC supporter paid for billboards across the country with “Say NO to mass immigration”, everybody freaked out. Moronic talking heads said we were racist, xenophobes, white supremacists.
But now, mainstream journalist @konradyakabuski uses many of the same arguments I have used all these years and that you will find in the PPC Immigration Policy in a long article in the mainstream @globeandmail, where he cites mainstream researchers, to explain the disastrous impact of Trudeau’s mass immigration policy.
And there is no negative reaction whatsoever. How come??
BECAUSE ANYONE WITH A BRAIN NOW HAS TO ADMIT I WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG!
The article is behind a paywall. For those who can’t read it, below are 12 excerpts with arguments you will recognize.
Soaring immigration levels under the Liberals have not made Canada richer, or its social programs more sustainable. If anything, the opposite is true.
It will take years to ramp up investments in housing, health care, public transportation and other infrastructure to accommodate the huge influx of newcomers the country has recently taken in.
2/
The country’s productivity deficit predates the recent population surge. But there is accumulating evidence that the latter is aggravating the former.
With a bigger pool of labour to draw on as a result of immigration, many businesses will be more likely to delay or forgo productivity-enhancing investments.
1/ This article gives a very revealing statistical portrait of the covid situation in Quebec.
These stats show that people under 60 in good health (with no preexisting condition) essentially had NO RISK of dying from covid — about 60 deaths out of 15k. journaldemontreal.com/2022/06/22/le-…
2/ The official number of covid deaths in Quebec, 15,462. is itself exaggerated, since it includes both those who died WITH covid and OF covid, the first group apparently being as numerous as the first.
3/ 69% of those who died were over 80 years old, which was more than their life expectancy at birth.
1/ Malgré le discours alarmiste des autorités et des médias, les personnes de moins de 60 ans en bonne santé (sans condition préexistante) n’ont essentiellement AUCUN RISQUE de mourir de la covid. journaldemontreal.com/2022/06/22/le-…
2/ Le nombre officiel de 15 462 décès est largement surestimé, principalement par l’inclusion des décès AVEC, et non À CAUSE de la covid, apparemment aussi nombreux.
3/ 69,2% des personnes décédées étaient âgées de plus de 80 ans, soit au-delà de leur espérance de vie à la naissance.