NEW BLOG: David Natzler, former Clerk (chief official) of the House of Commons, looks at the emergency bill being debated today, and how else parliament may need to adapt to maintain scrutiny during the COVID-19 crisis. #coronavirusuk
The Coronavirus Bill will be debated in the Commons today: a 321-page bill to be discussed for just six hours before going to the Lords.
Speed is clearly necessary, but it contains extensive powers and scrutiny is important to avoid mistakes being made.
An sad feature of current circumstances is that the #CoronavirusBill won't benefit from the usual scrutiny from key committees: Joint Committee on Human Rights, Lords Constitution and Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform committees.
Plenty for them to consider in this bill.
One major point of contention is the "sunsetting" arrangements.
The provisions are temporary, but last until 2022. Parliamentarians may want to shorten that, and build in more frequent reviews.
Beyond the bill, parliament will want to hold ministers to account throughout the crisis via select committees, (urgent) questions, and government statements.
Democratic oversight is essential, while nonetheless respecting that ministers are working flat out to do their jobs.
Parliament itself will need to adapt to COVID-19. To avoid overcrowded division lobbies possibilities include extensive "pairing" between the parties, use of proxy votes, or even block voting (though the latter will raise concerns and needs approaching with care).
Select committees are exploring virtual meetings via video conferencing, though there are technical challenges. The quorum may reduce to one member physically present.
In the Lords younger members will be able to preside, after the 82-year-old @LordSpeaker chose to self-isolate.
On Wednesday the Petitions Committee (@HoCpetitions) will hold an innovative session with ministers and the Chief Medical Officer on #coronavirusuk, after receiving 45,000 public questions, and petitions with 1.8 million signatures
Amidst much current talk of the NI Protocol and the ERG, Meg Russell and @james_lisak's forthcoming book sheds new light on this saga.
The ERG voted for the Protocol, as part of Johnson's deal, but very reluctantly. They feared that Brexit would otherwise be lost.
1/
David Frost's subsequent comments are quite well known.
Less so are claims in ERG member Mark Francois' book that the group promised, in private talks with No. 10, to support the deal only on the strict understanding that the NI Protocol would be changed.
2/
Francois says this was 'conveyed very clearly in private to the PM & No 10'.
If true, this means Johnson privately pledged to change the legal agreement he'd just reached before parliament had voted on it, & before selling it in general election 2019 as 'oven ready'.
3/
The Truss premiership has seen economic & political turmoil & a historic Labour lead.
Director Meg Russell argues the current crisis has been built on a foundation of poor constitutional governance and practice, established under her predecessor.
3 legacy characteristics of Johnson’s constitutional regime have been notable in the current crisis:
🚨a strained relationship with the civil service
🚨tension over the role of constitutional regulators 🚨sidelining of parliamentary scrutiny.
2/
Johnson held little regard for constitutional checks and balances, and his approach to constitutional norms and standards appeared central to his downfall in July 2022:
As May recalled in the Commons last week, the DUP were part of that blocking majority.
But there were "others". She refrains from saying who, but voters against included Boris Johnson, Dominic Raab, Priti Patel, Jacob Rees-Mogg & Suella Braverman.
NEW MONITOR: The 80th edition of Monitor was published today. It provides analysis of the last 4 months of constitutional news and contains sections on parliament, elections, devolution, the courts, & the monarchy. It is free and available now: ucl.ac.uk/constitution-u…
2/8 The PARLIAMENT section includes analysis of the fractious relationship between the government and parliament (including its own backbenchers & a record number of Lords defeats), and concerns about the proper scrutiny of delegated legislation.
3/8 The PARLIAMENT section also reports on parliamentary standards, including suggested changes to the Code of Conduct, & the Ryder review.
It discusses plans for the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster, which once again appear to be in flux.
This report, on attitudes towards democracy in the UK, is extremely timely, and have been quoted by the press and politicians. This morning, former PM John Major quoted our findings.
Professor Alan Renwick @alanjrenwick introduces key aspects of this project.
First, this report is based on our survey of around 6500 people conducted last summer. This was before the Owen Paterson affair and the “partygate” issue.