Erasure is real. Believe women, especially women of color, about this. Vidhya has countless stories of direct erasure, like being skipped in a round-robin vote of 10 other executive directors. Also, the original #eval theory tree is a case in point.
Great question by @work_with_libby on implications for teaching of evaluators. Pipeline programs risk reifying the myth of meritocracy.
Key points on allyship, a topic on which I've already learned much from Vidhya. Don't speak for people, don't just invite into spaces. Show up, listen, and put our jobs on the line if necessary to support the possibility of better worlds.
"If you are a woman of color and you speak in complete sentences about the history of racism, you are accused of being angry. So be positive? In hopes some white people will listen? Do you know what's going on out here?" Fire. #equitableeval#eval@evalcentral
"I have a whole dissertation worth of people who have tried it. It's not gonna' work. It requires collective organized action to change #HigherEd, the journals, and @aeaweb" - @shan0133#eval
#EvalSoWhite
Well-meaning white people in #eval: Evoking #MLK, a big obstacle. They (we) think we're beyond reproach, and can't reflect on our own behavior. Also a way of upholding #WhiteSupremacy.
New blog post: “Evidence of Systemic Racism (Part II), or, How to Talk with Your Systemic Racism Denier” tgarchibald.wordpress.com/2020/07/12/evi… A thread with some highlights:
This is a clarion call for those who would deny the existence of systemic racism to either refute the evidence with other evidence, or change their minds. I hope this can save you, dear reader, some time, effort, and headaches, any time you encounter a racism denier.
To date I have likely not convinced any systemic racism deniers that systemic racism exists; due to belief preservation, it is really hard to do. But if some white people learn a bit from this, and some BIPOC colleagues can have a day off from explaining these basic facts, good.