(1/11) It turns out #rewilding is all about #tortoises! Here’s another Mauritius tortoise paper for you by Griffiths et al. (2014), where they look at non-native tortoise grazing as a long-term restoration strategy.
(2/11) First, some context. Round Island restoration began in the 1970's by removing introduced herbivores (rabbits and goats). They previously grazed non-natives preventing non-natives out-competing native plants, although also prevented native forest regrowth.
(3/11) When non-native herbivores (rabbits and goats) were removed, non-natives plants out-competed native plants. Restoration efforts has involved manually promoting forest regrowth and manually clearing non-native plants.
(4/11): The authors conducted an 11-month enclosure experiment to see the effects of Aldabra giant tortoise and Madagascan radiate tortoise grazing on plant communities, in comparison to free-roaming tortoises.
(5/11) This was to see whether these non-native herbivores could act as functional surrogates for the extinct Mauritian giant tortoises, as well as being a more cost-effective way for restoration projects.
(6/11) Tortoises reduced vegetation height, plant cover, and plant biomass. This effect was generally greater by Aldabran giant tortoises.
(7/11) This influenced the abundance of adult plants, seedlings, flowers and seeds, and again this was greater in Aldabran tortoise enclosures.
(8/11) In free-roaming tortoises, similar effects were found in grazing plots, and ~90% diet consisted of non-native plants. Therefore, they were pretty effective at controlling the abundance and biomass of non-native plant species.
(9/11) Functional analogues were more cost-effective for non-native plant control in the long-term. Initial costs were 6-times higher but, after six years, human labour costs overtake the cost of using tortoises as functional surrogates.
(10/11) Despite this, the authors do conclude that human intervention is still likely necessary to maintain species diversity and restore rare native plants across the island.
(11/11) The authors remind us that caution is required with functional analogues, however these results continue to show the benefits of functional surrogates across spatial and temporal scales.
Here at @RewildingS, we hope everybody is doing alright out there. Hopefully this snippet of information is somewhat a small distraction from everything else going on. Remember #StayHome.
Today we're looking rewilding and animal-mediated seed dispersal in a paper that aims to identify areas and species in the Atlantic Forest to restore seed-dispersal interactions through rewilding 1/
The authors start by explaining that as animal populations and species decline, the ecological interactions involving them are lost. Trophic rewilding his to restore these interactions through reintroductions or surrogate introductions
2/
They say that certain types of animal interactions can be particularly beneficial, such as seed dispersal, which helps natural forest regeneration, creating more suitable habitat and a positive feedback loop
3/
Prehistoric or historic? What is the best baseline for #rewilding in the Neotropics? @JCSvenning and @FaurbySoren investigate the previous distribution of megafauna to inform future options of trophic rewilding in today’s #rewildingscience thread
Trophic rewilding – use of species to promote trophic cascades and self-regulating ecosystems often involves discussion around megafauna (large bodied species). Their high mobility, resitance to top-down effects, and ability to disperse nutrients makes them ecologically valuable
It is these species that have been subject to anthropogenic declines, including in the Neotropics. Historic baselines for species richness and distribution are now so intermingled with human effects that they may not represent a feasible point to base introductions on…
1/ Are you interested in how to carry out a reintroduction based #rewilding project? Then this paper (& thread) is for you. Zamboni et al introduce the reintroductions of giant anteater, collared peccaries, tapirs and more to The Iberá Rewilding Program IRP (Argentina)
2/ The Iberá rewilding project is part of the 13,000km2 Iberá Reserve; made up of public & private land. It has marshes, lagoons, small rivers, temporarily flooded grasslands, savannas, and forests. The Conservation Land Trust bought 1500km2 of private land in 1999 to restore.
Kicking off the afternoon session of the #RewildingSymposium is @JCSvenning talking about 'restoring the role of megafauna in European ecosystems'
He begins by highlighting that current megafauna is unusually poor. Last at this level >30 million years ago. Historically, super diverse megafauna was the norm.
He points out that most current species are 100,000 to >1m years old. Meaning they have a complex evolutionary background with the landscape and complex ecological characteristics
Paul Jepson of ecosulis the first speaker of the day, stating that #rewilding presents a new narrative in conservation fit for the 21st century. There are many actors shaping it, but in particlar its an opportunity for young people to shape and define their future environment
He says the science behind current laws in particular Natura2000 are based on science which is 50 years out of date. We need to redesign laws across Europe based on a new narrative and incorporating modern scientific thinking on rewilding
1/ This week we end with the future directions of conservation paper by Jozef Keulartz (2016). #rewilding has varied forms, which rather than competing, can be complementary. Read this #rewildingscience thread and join in the discussion
2/ Which historical baseline is used as a reference state is one of the central debates in #rewilding. This can depend on cultural and ecological context of where rewilding takes place….
3/ It has been argued that historic baselines are irrelevant due to current anthropogenic drivers e.g. climate change making it difficult to recreate historical ecosystems. There are two thoughts; to abandon history entirely, or to move the baseline to a more distant past