Can you guess how the Government is trying to significantly increase fines for breaking quarantine rules? Quick THREAD on coronavirus and Russian lawmaking. 👇1/? @KevinRothrock@gorokhovskaia@AlexNicest@Andrew__Roth
Russian media has been reporting that the Government has introduced a bill (законопроект) into the State Duma substantially increasing fines included in article 6.3 of the Code of Administrative Violations. 2/? interfax.ru/russia/700843
Article 6.3 relates to the "violation of legislation in the field of ensuring the sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population". 3/? consultant.ru/document/cons_…
Whereas the current maximum fine for legal entities breaking rules in this area is 20,000 rubles, the Government is proposing a maximum fine of 1 million rubles. 4/? tass.ru/obschestvo/808…
But the Government *has not* introduced a bill into the State Duma with these changes. Rather, it has proposed amendments to a bill *already under consideration*. 5/?
That bill was introduced by the Government into the State Duma on 2 October 2019. Its subject? Increasing administrative punishment for carrying out illegal private security activities – nothing whatsoever to do with breaking quarantine rules. 6/? sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/804768-7
Why is the Government trying to change the law by amending a bill (tackling an entirely different topic) already being considered by the State Duma, rather than introducing a new bill? It's all about time. 7/?
The new fines can be brought into force quicker by "piggybacking" the proposals onto a bill that's already been adopted in 1st reading (on 19 February this year). 8/?sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/804768-7
The Russian term for these add-ons (which can result in omnibus bills) is "vagonchiki" (вагончики) – little wagons (as in adding a wagon to a train). 9/?
But there's a problem: amendments proposed for second reading that do not relate to the main concept of a bill adopted in first reading are not technically allowed. 10/?cyberleninka.ru/article/n/popr…
People often complain about this practice of bolting on amendments in second reading that have nothing to do with the original bill. See this complaint from Vyacheslav Volodin. 11/? pravo.ru/news/213009/
The Government signed off on making these amendments to its own bill at its meeting on Thursday 26 March. 12/?government.ru/meetings/39274…
Can't quite believe that the book on Alexei Navalny that I've written with @JanMattiD and @m_lallouet for @HurstPublishers now exists. Short 🧵 on how the book came into existence. 1/?
With Navalny's poisoning, recovery, and return to Russia, he was in the news a lot from August 2020 – but Western media sometimes struggled to make sense of this complex figure. So I was often asked to recommend an English-language book on him. 2/?
This included @DrSeanHanley of @UCLSSEES, who suggested I write one if such a book didn't already exist. I reached out to @JanMattiD and @m_lallouet via Twitter on 29 January 2021 to ask whether they could recommend anything, given their research expertise on Navalny... 3/?
The State Duma has made public the amended version of Putin's constitutional reform bill. This is my very rough summary of some of the key points following a quick read through the text. THREAD 👇 1/? @UCLSSEES#Russiasozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/885214-7
The 68-page text prepared for 2nd reading (scheduled for 10 March) incorporates changes (approved by the lead committee) proposed to the 18-page bill originally submitted by Putin to the legislature on 20 January and adopted in 1st reading on 23 January. 2/?
The most important thing to stress is what *isn't* included in the amended bill, namely further details on the rebooted State Council. This fits with the Kremlin's interest in maintaining strategic ambiguity re: what Putin will do in 2024. Now onto what is mentioned. 3/?
This is almost too good to be true. A very short thread on how the high-priority concerns of the "nationwide vote" trump legislative rules. THREAD 👇 1/? #Russia
The State Duma Committee on State Building and Legislation – chaired by Pavel Krasheninnnikov (who's also one of the constitutional reform working group co-chairs) – has approved amending the Code of Administrative Violations. 2/?
These changes will mean that existing punishments re: electoral offences will also apply to the "nationwide vote". (Russian law doesn't already include the category of a "nationwide vote", which is why this legal tweaking is necessary.) 3/?