Good Product Strategy, Bad Product Strategy

A thread:
Good product strategy clearly identifies target customer segments and non-target segments.

Bad product strategy either ignores customer segmentation or attempts to cater to all customer segments.
Good product strategy presents an honest assessment of the market, the competition, and the product’s current position.

Bad product strategy either downplays the competition or ignores these factors altogether.
Good product strategy creates clarity on customer needs. Good product strategy is intentional and creative about tackling the right subset of those needs.

Bad product strategy presents a laundry list of priorities or “strategic goals” that attempt to tackle all customer needs.
Good product strategy is intentional about whether to play head to head against incumbents or to play on a different turf entirely.

Bad product strategy defaults to one of these stances without a rigorous assessment of options and industry trends.
Good product strategy highlights trade-offs and lays out the rationale for said trade-offs.

Bad product strategy eschews trade-offs and tries to be “all things to all people”.
Good product strategy builds upon the company’s existing advantages (companion products, distribution channels, partner relationships, etc.).

Bad product strategy either ignores these advantages or overestimates their potential impact on the product’s success.
Good product strategy increases chances of success by largely relying on the company's long-lasting advantages.

Bad product strategy relies on factors that might be a current source of advantage but are over time more susceptible to getting neutralized by the competition.
Good product strategy meaningfully differentiates the product in the market.

Bad product strategy makes proclamations about wanting to be “the best”, “most delightful”, “world-class” etc. without adequately specifying the concrete product choices that will make it so.
Good product strategy identifies leading and lagging indicators of success, whether they are metrics or milestones.

Bad product strategy either ignores success indicators or misses the leading indicators.
Good product strategy clearly presents its positive effect on the company, in terms of the company metrics impacted and the assets created or amplified.

Bad product strategy doesn’t provide a rigorous point of view on company-level upside.
Good product strategy is cognizant of the importance of execution. It prompts org-wide decisions and action by mapping the proposed product choices to a high-level action plan and associated risks.

Bad product strategy doesn’t map the proposed choices to cohesive actions.
Good product strategy provides company executives with a fresh perspective on the domain and the product.

Bad product strategy attempts to conform to executives’ pre-existing opinions about what should be done with the product.
Good product strategy is inspiring because it’s vivid, rigorous, and actionable.

Bad product strategy tries to sound visionary and ambitious, usually by employing Rah-Rah language and Apple Pie positions. Bad product strategy often reads like a prayer.

Good product strategy emerges from deep, nuanced thinking, but is articulated such that it’s easy to remember and repeat.

Bad product strategy is fluffy or abstruse.
Good product strategy optimizes for long-term business results.

Bad product strategy optimizes for near-term consensus.
It is not easy to create a good product strategy, but it is well worth the effort.
Must-read books on strategy:

1. Understanding Michael Porter, by Joan Magretta

2. 7 Powers, by Hamilton Hemler

3. Good Strategy / Bad Strategy, by Richard P. Rumelt

(most of the ideas above have been synthesized from these three books)
If you want to read this content all at once, check out my first Medium post here:

link.medium.com/gub6e9C8h5
What did I miss? Reply with your thoughts below.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shreyas Doshi

Shreyas Doshi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shreyas

Feb 12
Advanced time management principles:

(for senior product managers & leaders)
Lack of time is a perpetual source of stress in the product manager’s journey.

No matter how well you’ve prioritized, no matter what milestone your product has just reached, there is a near-infinite list of really important things you could be doing that you just cannot do.
There are many well-known resources & principles for managing time: systems such as GTD, “managing your energy, not your time”, prioritization formulas, Eisenhower Matrix, etc.

These are no doubt useful, but for product managers, these systems leave a lot to be desired.
Read 54 tweets
Jan 24
Why do companies with major resources & distribution make products that are mediocre & often fail to reach their potential?

There are a handful of reasons, many of which you already know. But there is one under-discussed reason: Operators Optimizing for Optics

Thread:
To understand this, let’s start with a story.

START OF STORY

Acme Inc has brilliant, visionary founders (Alice & Bob), amazing culture, has built a well-loved product, and thereby created a business much larger than the early people (including the founders) had ever imagined.
With this growth, they’ve had to hire a bunch of Operators: leaders who are skilled in scaling process, teams, operations, and overall execution. So far so good. As the business & the customer-base grows, it is a no-brainer for Acme to tackle adjacent areas of opportunity.
Read 60 tweets
Dec 31, 2021
Some reflections since turning on Twitter’s Super Follows two weeks ago.

800+ superfans have joined 🙌🏾

Biggest benefit:
I am tweeting a lot more freely because I know I am speaking to superfans who understand what I am about. More advanced & nuanced content. Fewer unsent drafts Image
Biggest surprise:
The community aspect of Super Follows has been A+ thus far.

While not a primary goal, it was 1 of my hypotheses for doing Super Follows. And it has vast exceeded everyone’s expectations. I polled folks yesterday for feedback, and community was mentioned by most Image
Many super followers mentioned that they are now using Twitter more frequently & are replying/sharing a lot more freely with the community than they might in public, because of shared alignment.

One super follower said it best: people writing without fear of being misunderstood
Read 10 tweets
Dec 18, 2021
What you can expect as my Super Follower:

In-depth product threads

Product teardowns

Video/audio highlight clips
(from my private workshops)

Stories & examples from my career

Fortnightly Zoom AMAs

Previews of my upcoming book

Private index of threads

Maybe some 🌶️🔥 takes Image
A sample of my writing over the past couple of years:
Some samples of Super Follows content 👇🏾
Read 6 tweets
Dec 17, 2021
As they grow in size, teams within megacorps and startups tend to implicitly bias more towards Project Thinking and not enough Product Thinking.

Product Thinking is a mindset and a process that, once you see, you cannot unsee it.

Product Thinking, Project Thinking, a thread: Image
From my experience working in individual contributor & leadership roles over the past couple of decades, and from my advising work with a number of fast-growth startups, I have often seen myself and founders / CEOs / execs worry about these things: Image
And, having been in the trenches of product work for a large part of my career, and having managed / mentored / coached hundreds of PMs & PM Managers, I have often seen myself, and other ICs & managers worry about these things: Image
Read 42 tweets
Nov 21, 2021
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective PMs:

1) Be proactive
2) Begin with the end in mind
3) Put first things first
4) Think win-win
5) First understand, then seek to be understood
6) Teamwork & creative cooperation
7) Continuous improvement

Basically, the habits in the classic book.
I know that many Product Managers will ignore this because they want something more advanced.

They have already read Covey's book at age 23, so there's nothing more & nothing new to learn from it.

They want an edge over others, so they seek & love esoteric advice & tactics.
And yet, 9 out of 10 times when I am working with extremely smart & ambitious PMs who are struggling (not getting promoted, not getting the performance reviews they think they deserve, not executing well, etc.) it is because they have forgotten one (or more) of these 7 habits.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(