Post

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1245748282284007428?s=20

More from @drawandstrike

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Oct 29

YOU HAVE BROKEN THEM.

They're Now Reduced To Whining 'NAZI NAZI NAZI' All Day Long

And it is GLORIOUS.

Thread incoming! 🧵

YOU did this.

YOU forced them into an unwinnable position in an Information War.

YOU broke their Censorship State [with a big assist from Elon!], and then you fractured their Fake News Media Matrix.

"THEY'RE NOT BUYING IT! WHAT DO WE DO NOW??!!"

They tried to MARGINALIZE you, drive you out of sight, render you into a new class of Untouchables, and literally excommunicate you from American society.

YOU didn't back down. YOU didn't stop fighting them.

And in the end?

They broke their Machine trying to get it to spit out a working illusion that The Cackling Ditz No One Really Likes was top-shelf presidential material.

YOU **forced** them to do that.

Read 12 tweets

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

@drawandstrike

Oct 6

#30DaysofStorm

The hunters are now the hunted.

They've NEVER been in this position before.

They always had full control of the news media and all social media. They could easily make stories disappear.

They don't know what to do.

They don't know how to make it stop.

#30DaysofStorm

In the past, they NEEDED at least HALF the public to go along with their bewitching illusions cast via their Fake News Media Matrix.

And right now, they NEEDED at least half the country to fall under the new illusion of "Kamala Fever!" to counteract MAGA.

#30DaysofStorm

But after more than 2 1/2 months of attempting to cast the illusion that a "Kamala Fever!" is sweeping the country, a mass popular movement to embrace The Cackling Ditz, they have failed.

The illusion is not working.

What Trump did today demonstrated yet again what a REAL mass popular movement looks like.

They can't stop it.

They can't hide it.

They can't contain it.

Read 11 tweets

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

@drawandstrike

Sep 18

Kanye knows.

He knows all about the intelligence agency handlers/controllers/brainwashers surrounding most of the 'stars' this evil system creates.

He came up through it.

And he's paid a massive personal price for trying to expose it.

Was he trying to hint at what Taylor Swift was being set up for with this stunt?

Maybe start listening to him.

The system creates 'stars' for the public to follow.

The stars are subjected to a MASSIVE amount of control via drugs & brainwashing before they are elevated to a cultural icon position in order to spread narratives to the public that adores them.

We are currently BREAKING this system.

Our goal is to destroy it.

The Great Awakening.

Kanye knows all about Sean Combs and what his controllers/druggers/ brainwashers were using him to do.

"The Epstein of the Music Industry"

Read 4 tweets

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

@drawandstrike

Sep 17

They've been taking twisted sexual perverts and turning them into massive 'stars' for decades.

And not just in the music industry and Hollywood.

Any big, massive sphere of influence that allows them to draw powerful people in and entrap/enslave them.

This includes federal agencies. Key members of the US Congress. Presidents, even.

As this develops, some of you out there are going to BEGIN to understand why this has to be rolled up slowly starting at the bottom, with people like Epstein, Maxwell, and now Combs.

The people who shielded them and covered up for them are running out of road. They understand once all their 'stars' are exposed, they're next.

The Great Awakening.

Who took the picture?

Who is in the picture?

Where was it taken?

What was waiting for them back at the hotel?

Who is she?

Who is she pictured with?

Where was the picture taken?

What kind of business is she in?

Does she 'work' with underage models?

Read 5 tweets

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

@drawandstrike

Aug 9

OK time to clear something up for those of you out there in Rio Linda who are downplaying what Ken Paxton just did, gutting the ActBlue money-laundering/fraudulent donation scheme in mid-election.

I see people engaging in magical thinking:

“Oh, no problem here for ActBlue! Paxton didn't really do ANYTHING forcing them to turn the credit card CCV's back on! They’ll just start using the victim’s real card numbers and the CCV’s that go with that card!”

Pay attention to the next post VERY CAREFULLY.

As usual, as they have done since the Obama campaign began using this AMAZING TRICK in 2008 of using fraudulent donor's names with the CCV turned off to HIDE who was really making the donations...

The Democrats spent the last several YEARS building up a massive database of real names/addresses to utilize for their 2024 election fraud operations.

Although there's likely only a couple HUNDRED deep pockets secret donors who's identities they need to head, they needed THOUSANDS names/addresses of REAL PEOPLE to pull off this money laundering/fake donations scheme.

The entire POINT of the 'turn off the CCV/use real names to hide the identity of the actual donor' scheme is to HIDE WHERE THE MONEY IS ACTUALLY COMING FROM THAT IS BEING DONATED.

Everybody got that?

We all on the same page here?

They don't WANT anybody to know some fucking oligarch in Ukraine donated a million bucks to the Democrat campaign.

So how do they go about HIDING this massive ILLEGAL donation from a foreign oligarch to the Democrats?

Simple: they break it up into a thousand smaller donations coming from "Americans" who's identities they have stolen.

Now, these have to be real names. The addresses have to be real. This has to pass a cursory check of name/address.

But as long as they were **ALLOWED** to keep the CCV feature turned off, it couldn't be checked to determine if that sweet old retired lady living in an apartment in Peoria Illinois was the one who actually made that donation.

Read 5 tweets

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

@drawandstrike

Jul 28

IF YOU WANTED TO KILL A PRESIDENT AND MAKE IT LOOK GOOD, HOW WOULD YOU GO ABOUT IT?

Wouldn't You Take Concrete Steps to Deliberately Compromise the Ability and Competency Levels of His Security Detail?

Isn’t that precisely what happened to Donald J. Trump at the Butler, Pennsylvania, rally two weeks ago?

Didn’t a former President, who is known to be a direct and existential threat to the present corrupt system in Washington DC, end up being shot because a series of very curious and indefensible decisions were made regarding both his security detail and the security plans for that rally?

It has become abundantly clear that many of the decisions made regarding Trump’s security at the Butler rally were indefensible because the Secret Service Director who was in charge of that agency in the lead-up to this assassination attempt is now the **former** Secret Service Director.

Secret Service Chief Kimberly Cheatle resigned on July 23rd, exactly ten days after Trump was shot.

1/briancates.substack.com/p/if-you-wante…

In several hours of testimony before a Congressional panel of US lawmakers last Monday, Cheatle’s answers were evasive, nonsensical, and often defiant.

Although it is the standard dodge at such hearings of this nature to constantly refer to ‘the ongoing investigation’ to preclude discussion of certain matters, Cheatle’s constant refrain that she ‘took full responsibility’ for the glaring security lapses that led to Trump being shot began to grate on the ears as she adamantly refused to discuss in any detail whatsoever exactly how those manifest security lapses in Butler, PA that day came about.

During her testimony, Cheatle was directly asked several times how much of Trump’s security detail for the Butler rally were not Secret Service agents but were instead brought in from other agencies.

Cheatle consistently avoided answering those questions.

Far from being a close-knit, crack team of Secret Service agents well-versed in the techniques, strategies, and carrying out of close personal security operations who were long used to working together as a unit…it was slowly and laboriously being learned that Trump’s security team in Butler that day was actually a quickly assembled hodgepodge of agents cobbled from various federal agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security’s Homeland Security Investigations agency.

2/

In other words, strings appear to have been pulled to ensure Trump was surrounded by impressive-looking agents in suits and sunglasses that day in Butler who didn’t have any real training in providing close personal security. They were not really bodyguards and had no real training for the roles they were suddenly thrust into.

The HSI people at the DHS may be fine law enforcement officers when it comes to investigating cases, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll know what they’re doing when, for some strange and mysterious reason, someone high up the chain of command decides to pull them off of their cases at HSI and suddenly drop them into a former President’s security detail.

Who made that decision? Why was that decision made?

3/

Read 8 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @drawandstrike

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!