I like Matthew a lot, but I don't feel this is a "dumb overreaction."
As a security admin overseeing 40K+ students and participating in communities serving over 1.5M students, I would love to shed some light on the difficulties Zoom has created for us.
Is that ever 100% effective?
Again, communicating to teachers to change existing meetings? This is hard.
Fortunately, Zoom has done the right thing and appears to have updated all meetings for us (according to staff reports too).
support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/artic…
I think there's a big misunderstanding at NYC here. Zoom's Basic accounts do not have controls to allow us to comply with FERPA laws.
Zoom "upgraded" these Basic accounts to add those controls, so if we are setting them properly, then we are covered.
Schools have very weird threat models. If we create accounts for students, they can use school resources to video and chat with each other in something where we have limited auditing capabilities.
This should matter.
Schools providing resources with no controls keeping students safe is irresponsible.
College and older? Who cares.
Students will find your PoC and attempt to use it - they are awesomely curious.
Zoom's long running bad practices and how they have handled it is what bothers me. There will always be vulnerabilities.
I don't trust them to handle our data the way they are claiming based on previous experiences, and recent news has only made that distrust worse.
Forcing thousands of teachers to lose existing investments and learn something new is a big deal.
The risk is students getting exposed to bad stuff, but that can happen on other poorly configured platforms too.
I don't know the nuances of NY, but I do know we have received communication from concerned parents.
It's hard to balance this well while still valuing your community.