Profile picture
, 4 tweets, 2 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Poll results: legal twitter and layperson twitter results are basically the same.

View of 'what does sex mean?' in the Equality Act is largely split between biology, and 'biology unless someone has a GRC'
Which chimes with Julius Komorowski 's conclusion that neither can be ruled out (and disagrees with @AlexSharpe64)

lawscot.org.uk/members/journa…

The law is quite ambiguous on this ... it seems like the interaction between the GRA & the Equality Act really wasn't thought through ...
What is less ambiguous is that the exemptions allow single sex services and allow them to *be* single sex (i.e. in practice when it comes to situations where sex matters, sex means biology)
The purpose of discrimination law is to "address mismatch between reality & past assumptions or stereotypes"

The GRA overrules reality in favour of stereotypes (for a v small group of people understood to have a medical need)

So it is not surprising they don't fit together well
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater see all

Profile picture
Maya Forstater
@MForstater
This is chilling.

This is what is happening in Canada: Vancouver Rape Relief is called a "neo-nazi style", "cryptofacist" "hate group" for wanting to provide a rape crisis service & domestic violence refuge to female survivors with female staff .

medium.com/empowered-tran…
Public funding was threatened to be withdrawn "VRR’s leadership was told to think about their choices... Choosing inclusion would have cost VRR absolutely nothing & gained them everything"

VRR's leadership chose not to 'include' males.

Public funding was removed.
Next plan of those who don't want women recovering from male violence to be allowed *any* female only space....

... Sue them for discrimination: "With enough lawsuits, you could seize ownership of the facilities and throw the current collective out on their ears."
Read 16 tweets
Profile picture
Maya Forstater
@MForstater
I have a degree of patience for arguing with aggressive TRAs on the internet who accuse me of being legally illiterate and say that Sch III p28 EqA gives people the right to access services of the opposite sex. But I would find it quite intimidating (and dangerous) in real life.
It should not require *any* degree of legal literacy for people to be able to use communal changing, washing & sleeping facilities understanding who is allowed where.

That we are arguing about this is a sign of the failure of @EHRC to do its job: clear workable guidance.
When people are undressing, washing, sleeping in a communal space there should be no ambiguity about whether it is single sex or mixed sex

There need to be bright lines to be clear who has a right to use that space

"Gender identity" & "gender expression" are not bright lines
Read 3 tweets
Profile picture
Maya Forstater
@MForstater
It is ten years, this week, since the Equality Act got royal assent .

At its heart are 9 protected characteristics and 4 prohibited acts (direct and indirect discrimination, harassment, victimisation)
10 years old and still there is ambiguity about what one of the protected characteristics -- sex -- means.

And about whether single and separate sex service can be clearly single sex.

As the @Commonswomequ report said 'different people use the term in different ways'
The government is committed to producing new guidance to clarify.

If @GEOgovuk goes back to the law it will find that what is in the current official guidance is not supported.

This guidance from @EHRC is the opposite of what the Equality Act says (what is a 'gender role'?)
Read 8 tweets

Embed code for your website

×
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!