Think some either don't know the true data or the true meaning of the word, "anecdotal".
The evidence re: HCQ is no longer "anecdotal". We have multiple studies, albeit small, in multiple countries.
Further, there are treatments and vaccines...
The evidence re: HCQ is no longer "anecdotal". We have multiple studies, albeit small, in multiple countries.
Further, there are treatments and vaccines...
Further, there are treatments and vaccines now considered standard and in widespread use that have never been subjected to the type of large, randomized clinical trials arbitrarily adopted as the standard for determining the efficacy of hyrdroxchloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment.
Now, we can argue "about" the efficacy of hyrdroxchloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment, but not whether it the evidence is just "anecdotal".
Those statements demonstrate a complete lack of understanding and misuse of the meaning of the word.
Those statements demonstrate a complete lack of understanding and misuse of the meaning of the word.
