The Dem response seems to be assuming the citizenry current disapproval w Tr is deep. & so don't have to be forceful, positive, unflinching in the messaging. Preferring, it seems,the passive voice.
We need to..
I hope the Prez...
IMO, it needs more than token, not very well focused efforts than appealing to to the
IMO the way he is handling this VP convo is a perfect example. Maybe I am missing something. I surely hope so. But its strikes me as weak and reactive rather than purposeful, intentional, powerful.
Sure we'll have
If it is Harris, is she going to be allowed to be more articulate, more forceful than Biden, the P. candidate?
If so, then how does that play?
And, perhaps worse, if not, how does that play?
Unless there is far more clarity,
It might, just bec of the magnitude of the
I hope I am off base and missing important and even obvious facts and factors.
Consider exhibit #1:
Trump is not going to play by the "rules". His utter disregard for truth, facts or people is well known. He is able to use these disrupters to his advantage bec no one believes he could or would do what he does.
seems inadequate.
This is where Bernie and Warren were exemplary. They made powerful, clear statements of the lay of the land as they understood it, and made clear distinctions
The times do not call for a folksy, ah shucks, sort of engagement. Neither does it call for histrionics and hyperbole.
It seems an unyielding incisive clarity, not only of what is wrong w Trump, but what the antidote is, is demanded.
But my read of the temperature is people are "for Biden" because he is the choice of the Dem establishment & is who we got.
How many are saying 'he is not my first choice, but he is the only choice we have now..."
I suppose my question is How can that turnaround happen?
He will, or should. But that is insufficient as a strategy. IMO.
Attacks are coming that will shock those who care about such things. I hope they are ready for it.