Profile picture
, 3 tweets, 1 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Wondering if @whca has any comment.

Since we have been reliably told they "determine" seating...
cc: @jonkarl - Since you are the current President of the White House Correspondents Association.

Who determines the reporters that attend WH Briefing?

Who vets them?

Given the current situation, does the WHCA believe that reporters working for the CCP should be given access?
If these reporters do have ties to the CCP, why is this affiliation not publicly made known?

And if these same reporters attempt to mask their affiliations w/CCP through misleading statements during WH Press Briefing why do you as an organization not immediately correct?
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Jeff Carlson

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @themarketswork see all

Profile picture
Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
Grassley-Johnson statement on newly unredacted footnotes:

grassley.senate.gov/news/news-rele…
"The footnotes reveal that, beginning early on and continuing throughout the FBI’s Russia investigation, FBI officials learned critical information streams that flowed to the dossier were likely tainted with Russian Intelligence disinformation."
"Despite later intelligence reports that key elements of the FBI’s evidence were the result of Russian infiltration to undermine U.S. foreign relations, the FBI still pushed forward with its probe."
Read 8 tweets
Profile picture
Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
Our supply chain repatriations are really going to be fun to watch.
To those saying a Supply Chain repatriation won't happen:

1) It won't be whole-scale. Will be gradual

2) Will be cost-benefit analysis based

3) Companies will look ahead to cost of future interruptions

4) Alternatives exist

5) Small pullback has huge implications for China
China will still be an important source of manufacturing for the US (like it or not).

But a small shift in supply lines as companies reassess the ideas of JIT, sole-source manufacturing and future impacts of CV strains will be very real.

China has every right to be worried.
Read 3 tweets
Profile picture
Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
President Trump: The WHO "criticized and disagreed with my travel ban. And they were wrong. They've been wrong about a lot of things...They seem to be very China-centric."
President Trump on WHO (Cont): We have to look into that...They missed the call...They should have known. And they probably did know. We'll be looking into that very carefully...We're going to put a hold on money spent to the WHO."
Trump on WHO (Q&A): They seem to be very China-centric. And they seem to err always on the side of China. And we fund it. So I want to look into that...We're gonna look at it. We will look at ending funding...Everything seems to be very biased towards China. That's not right.
Read 3 tweets

Embed code for your website

×
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!