Get this: the FBI/DOJ are claiming that public news articles from the Washington Post are "sensitive information" to be blacked out. I'm not kidding! 🚨
THREAD
....they're just quoting from a *public Washington Post article*.
This one: washingtonpost.com/politics/who-i…
This section of the FISAs is referring to the public exposure of Sergei Millian as a potential source for the Steele dossier
That exposure happened on Jan 24 2017 (WSJ), and March 29 2017 (WaPo, above)
—The 2nd (1st renewal) was on Jan 12 2017
Both were before those WSJ/WaPo stories appeared.
That's why this section of the FISAs appears for the first time in the 2nd renewal (and is repeated in the 3rd renewal)
—Only by coming clean can everyone regain confidence in the FBI/DOJ and the redactions process. This isn't helping.
Those statements from DOJ to Congress about "minimal" & "limited" redactions are not true.
The Assistant AG should be hauled in to Congress and asked to justify these redactions, in light of the information available in the IG report and the public domain.
/ENDS