"2. The debris pile of WTC 7 was contained mostly inside the building’s footprint. Furthermore, it did not have large pieces of concrete flooring or intact structural framing
that would be expected in a building collapse"
about by use of directed energy weapons. (END OF QUOTE)
So, here we see, Dr. Wood's legal filing set WTC 7 apart as a "possible exception" to a Directed Energy Weapon destroying WTC 7.
drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/…
This part of the lawsuit speaks for itself when considering this exchange about WTC Bldg. 7.
A belief is not a factual, empirical, or scientific statement. The "belief" in this paragraph (10)..
Even in Dr. Wood's own legal filing, the Twin Towers COULD have been destroyed ONLY "in SUBSTANTIAL PART" by DEW, not just ONLY DEW.